The $49 New Patient Special and Per-Patient Marketing Fees
Dr. Benton’s website advertises "Board-Certified Chiropractor - We Cure Herniated Discs Without Surgery" and a "$49 New Patient Special" that includes an exam, x-rays, and a "free MRI review." Dr. Benton completed a 40-hour private certification in a decompression technique but is not board certified by any specialty board recognized by the Florida Board of Chiropractic Medicine. He contracts with a marketing company that guarantees 25 new patients per month and charges $175 per patient who keeps an appointment. He also pays a licensed massage therapist $25 for each patient she refers. The site does not state that the MRI review is a records review only, not an MRI performed on site, and does not disclose that the $49 offer requires a 12-visit package. A patient complains after being billed $2,400.
1. Identify the advertising violations in this scenario and explain why each statement or omission is misleading.
Read the worked answer
Several statements are misleading. “Board-Certified” implies certification by a board recognized by the Florida Board of Chiropractic Medicine; a private 40-hour technique certificate does not qualify, so the claim is false as written. “We cure herniated discs without surgery” asserts a cure and a superior outcome that cannot be substantiated and may create unrealistic expectations. The “$49 New Patient Special” is misleading if it does not disclose the required 12-visit package and total cost. “Free MRI review” is misleading unless the office clearly states that it is a review of records or images, not an MRI performed on site. A truthful ad must be specific, avoid guarantees of cure, disclose material conditions, and use accurate credential language. Dr. Benton should revise the website and all social-media copy, retain copies of the corrected ads, and be prepared to substantiate every objective claim.
2. Analyze the marketing-company payment and the massage therapist referral payments under Florida fee-splitting and patient-brokering principles.
Read the worked answer
Paying a marketing company $175 for each patient who keeps an appointment is not a flat advertising fee; it is compensation tied to patient volume or referral. Florida prohibits paying or receiving commissions, bonuses, kickbacks, or fees for the referral of patients, and per-patient payments can constitute patient brokering or fee splitting even when the marketer is not a health care provider. Paying the massage therapist $25 per referral is even clearer: a chiropractic physician may not pay an unlicensed person a fee for sending patients. The lawful alternative is a fixed, fair-market marketing fee not conditioned on the number of patients generated, with no payment tied to referrals. Dr. Benton should stop the per-patient and per-referral payments, review existing arrangements, and recognize that the financial records may be used in a disciplinary investigation.
3. What records should Dr. Benton preserve and what corrective steps should he take before the complaint is investigated?
Read the worked answer
He should preserve the original website and social-media pages, advertising contracts, marketing invoices, patient ledgers, and the records of the complainant. Do not destroy or alter the ads after the complaint. Correct the ads immediately, stop the per-patient and per-referral payments, and provide a written disclosure of the total cost and conditions of the $49 offer. The patient’s record should accurately reflect what was performed and billed, including whether an MRI was actually performed or only reviewed. He should also review all current marketing arrangements for similar per-head payments and obtain advice about refunding or adjusting improper charges. In a Board investigation, the pattern of payments and the misleading ads will matter more than a single corrected webpage.