The Waikiki HO-6, the Burst Connector, and the Special Assessment
An owner-occupied unit on the 14th floor of a Waikiki high-rise. The flex connector on the water heater in the unit above failed while our insured was on the mainland for five days. Water ran continuously. Our insured's unit sustained $18,000 in drywall and flooring damage and, by day five, $12,000 in mold remediation. The HO-6 shows Coverage A of $75,000, a mold sublimit of $10,000, and loss assessment coverage of $30,000. Discharge from a plumbing system is a covered peril under the form. The AOAO has levied a $25,000 special assessment on each unit to pay the master policy deductible for water damage to the common-element corridors; the master policy covers the building and common elements. The upstairs unit is vacant and unrented.
1. Set out the coverage determination for the direct water damage and for the mold.
Read the worked answer
Water damage. A failed flex connector is a sudden and accidental discharge from a plumbing system - a covered peril. The 14-day constant-or-repeated-seepage exclusion does not apply because the failure was abrupt. The $18,000 in drywall and flooring is payable, subject to Coverage A and the policy deductible.
Mold. The $12,000 remediation follows a covered water loss, so the mold sublimit governs rather than an outright exclusion: $10,000 is payable and $2,000 is not.
The mitigation question - resist the easy denial. The policy imposes a duty to protect the property from further damage. Five days of unattended running water is a legitimate line of inquiry, but absence from the unit is not per se a breach, and the carrier cannot forfeit the whole mold benefit on a technical failure without showing material prejudice. Ask what precautions were taken: was the supply shut off, was a neighbor or building manager checking the unit, was a leak detector installed. If the evidence shows the insured made no arrangement at all for a 14th-floor unit in a building with shared infrastructure, argue the incremental mold damage attributable to the delay - not the entire mold claim. Document the reasoning either way.
2. Is the $25,000 special assessment covered, and what must you obtain before paying?
Read the worked answer
Framework. Loss assessment coverage responds when the association levies an assessment against the unit owner because of a direct loss to collectively owned property caused by a peril insured under the unit owner's policy. The typical application is the owner's share of a master policy deductible.
Application. The peril here - discharge of water - is a covered peril under the HO-6. The assessment was levied on all units to fund the master policy deductible for corridor damage. That fits the provision, subject to the $30,000 limit, which comfortably exceeds the $25,000 assessment. So this is payable, not merely arguable.
Before paying, obtain: the association's board resolution or assessment notice showing the amount, the effective date, and the stated purpose; the master policy declarations page confirming the deductible and that corridors are insured property; confirmation that the corridor damage arose from this same water event rather than deferred maintenance; and proof the insured has actually been assessed (a payment plan or invoice). Watch for duplication - if the master policy pays the corridor damage itself and the association separately bills the owner, do not pay the same assessment component twice across the two policies.
3. Assess subrogation against the upstairs neighbor and the association, and state what you would do with this file.
Read the worked answer
Subrogation against the neighbor. Recovery requires proving negligence - an owner is not automatically liable for a component that fails. A flex connector can fail from age, installation error, or supply-line pressure. You would need evidence of the connector's age and condition, whether it was accessible and should have been inspected or replaced, and whether the vacant unit was properly maintained and the water shut off. Without that, subrogation is a cost center.
Against the association. The insured is a member of the AOAO, and association documents frequently require owners to look to insurance rather than to each other, and often contain waivers of subrogation. Assess a claim against the association carefully - it may be barred as circular, and it will be funded by the same owners through assessments.
File actions. Preserve the failed connector before it is discarded. Read the declaration and bylaws for waiver language. Check whether the upstairs owner has an HO-6 that might respond. Send a subrogation notice letter to the upstairs owner and the association to toll any limitation period while you decide, and close out the insured's claim promptly rather than holding payment hostage to a speculative recovery.