Three Versions of the Truth
Twenty-one days before a 320-guest client appreciation dinner, three documents disagree: the signed banquet event order shows a plated three-course dinner at 6:30 p.m.; the venue's production sheet shows a buffet at 7:00 p.m.; the caterer's prep sheet shows plated service at 7:15. Yesterday the client's executive assistant called to "switch to buffet so people can mingle," and you said you would look into it. The dietary log - 11 vegetarian, 4 gluten-free, 2 nut allergies - lives in one coordinator's spreadsheet that she updates when she remembers. The contract requires written changes 14 days out and prices a plated-to-buffet change at $9 per person plus a $600 labor fee.
1. What is the controlling arrangement today, and what do you do about the buffet request?
Read the worked answer
Controlling document: the signed BEO. It is the executed version of the contract's scope. The production sheet and the prep sheet are operational derivatives; when they conflict with the signed BEO, the BEO wins and the others are wrong.
On the verbal request:
- The executive assistant has not been delegated signature authority in writing. A phone call is not a change order, and "I'll look into it" is not an approval - both need to be said out loud to the assistant, politely.
- The request is still within the change window: 14 days out means I have roughly 7 days to accept a written change. So there is a real decision to make, not a rejection to issue.
- Cost: $9 x 320 = $2,880 + $600 labor = $3,480, before tax and service charge. The client should see that number before deciding, not after.
- Program judgment: buffet helps mingle; plated gives tighter allergen control and a fixed service time for an awards program. With 2 nut allergies and 4 gluten-free guests, plated with a labeled plate and a named runner is the safer operation unless the buffet is staffed and allergen-labeled.
Action: email the client's designated approver with two lines - the cost and the allergen implication - and a deadline. Get the decision in writing, then issue a written change order and reissue the BEO as a new dated version. Confirm the change to the caterer and venue in writing the same day, with the new version attached.
2. How do you fix the records problem so it does not recur at the next event?
Read the worked answer
The symptom is three documents; the cause is no single source of truth and no change process.
Establish the hierarchy explicitly. Contract → signed BEO/change orders → production sheets → internal prep sheets. Every downstream document must cite the version of the BEO it derives from, and any conflict routes to me, not to whoever answers the phone.
One master document, versioned. Date and version number in the file name and the footer (e.g., "BEO v3 - 2025-04-14 - supersedes v2"). Every distribution gets a cover note: "This version supersedes all prior versions; destroy earlier copies."
A change log. One table: date, requestor, what changed, cost impact, approval, version issued. This is the document that answers "who agreed to that?" three months later.
One dietary log, one owner. Fixed fields (name, table, restriction, severity, confirmed-by, confirmed-date, communicated-to-chef). Reconciled at 72 hours and again at the pre-conference walk-through, with a signature from the chef. A coordinator's personal spreadsheet with no reconciliation is the classic failure point for an allergy.
A controlled distribution list with acknowledgment, so "I never got it" is visible rather than plausible.
3. What do you confirm at the pre-conference meeting, and what do you take away signed?
Read the worked answer
Walk the room, do not meet in an office. Confirm against the current BEO version, with the venue and caterer together:
- Covers (320 guaranteed, plus the contract's overage allowance), service style, and service start time.
- Allergen protocol: how a nut-allergy plate is identified, who runs it, who confirms with the guest, whether the buffet is staffed and labeled, and where the ingredient lists are. Name the chef and the banquet captain responsible.
- Dietary counts handed to the chef and initialed by both of us.
- Bar type, last call, and cutoff consistent with service of alcohol limits and any local requirements.
- Room set, exits, signage, AV cues, and the awards run-of-show timings.
- Named on-site contact and phone for each party, and the escalation path if something changes after the meeting.
Take away: a signed copy of the current BEO version; the initialed dietary log; the run-of-show with the version number; and a written confirmation of any change agreed in the room, issued the same day as a new version. If something is agreed verbally at the walk-through and not written down, it did not happen - that is precisely how I ended up with three versions of the truth.