IB English Lang Lit SL study plan
IB English Lang Lit SL · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Readers, writers and texts
Map how a reader's context shapes meaning by annotating two short prose extracts for explicit and implied reader positioning
Distinguish author, narrator, and implied author in three passages and record the evidence for each distinction
Build a working definition of 'context of production' and 'context of reception' and test it against one advertisement and one poem
Draft a one-paragraph thesis linking a writer's choices to a reader effect, then revise it for precision
Your checkpoint
A 600-word analytical annotation set on two unseen prose extracts identifying at least five writer's choices and their reader effects
Readers, writers and texts
Analyse how form and structure create meaning by comparing a sonnet and a free-verse poem on a shared theme
Catalogue register, diction, and syntax features in a non-literary text and explain their persuasive function
Practise embedding short quotations rather than block quoting in analytical paragraphs
Self-assess two paragraphs against a criteria checklist and rewrite the weaker one
Your checkpoint
A 700-word comparative close-reading of a poem and a non-literary text, with a self-assessment table scoring each against three criteria
Time and space
Situate a literary text in its historical moment and identify three textual details that register that moment
Trace how a single motif shifts meaning across three texts from different periods
Explain how a text's reception changes when read outside its original time and place
Construct a timeline linking your two works in translation or your two studied literary works to their contexts
Your checkpoint
A one-page annotated timeline for your two Paper 2 works, each entry citing a specific textual detail tied to context
Time and space
Compare how two texts from different eras treat an identical theme, naming the specific formal differences
Draft three Paper 2-style comparative thesis statements and stress-test each for arguability
Identify and correct presentism in your own analysis of an older text
Select and justify six quotations that could serve two different Paper 2 prompts
Your checkpoint
A comparative essay outline plus a quotation bank of six passages, each tagged to theme, context, and formal feature
Intertextuality: connecting texts
Identify three deliberate allusions or intertextual echoes in your studied works and explain the effect of each
Compare how two texts adapt or subvert a shared genre convention
Analyse a non-literary text that responds to a literary work, naming the rhetorical move it makes
Draft a paragraph that uses one text to illuminate another without collapsing their differences
Your checkpoint
A 500-word intertextual analysis tracing one shared motif across three texts, with a citation for each link
Paper 1: Guided textual analysis skills
Complete two timed 60-minute guided textual analyses on unseen texts under exam conditions
Apply a repeatable annotation routine: identify audience, purpose, register, and three structural choices within the first ten minutes
Write introductions that state a clear analytical through-line rather than summarising the text
Mark your own responses against the four Paper 1 criteria and log recurring weaknesses
Your checkpoint
Two timed Paper 1 responses with a self-marked rubric and a prioritised list of three weaknesses to fix
Paper 2: Comparative essay skills & Individual oral: global issue and extracts
Write one full timed Paper 2 comparative essay on a past-style prompt in 90 minutes
Select two oral extracts of roughly 40 lines each that support a single global issue and annotate them for extract-specific evidence
Draft a 10-minute oral structure: global issue framing, extract analysis, and work-level widening
Rehearse the oral aloud twice and time each run
Your checkpoint
One timed Paper 2 essay plus a recorded or timed 10-minute oral with a one-page extract annotation sheet
Paper 2: Comparative essay skills & Individual oral: global issue and extracts & Readers, writers and texts
Consolidate by rewriting your weakest Paper 1 and Paper 2 paragraphs from weeks 6 and 7
Refine the oral's global issue statement so it is genuinely global, not text-specific
Build a one-page revision sheet of formal features, contextual anchors, and intertextual links across all studied texts
Run a final timed Paper 1 to confirm timing and stamina
Your checkpoint
A one-page master revision sheet plus one final timed Paper 1 response and a revised oral outline
Milestones
Week 2: Can analyse an unseen text for writer's choices and reader effects in under 45 minutes without notes
Week 4: Can produce a defensible comparative thesis linking two works across time and space in under 15 minutes
Week 6: Two timed Paper 1 responses completed within 60 minutes each and self-marked against all four criteria
Week 7: Full Paper 2 essay finished in 90 minutes and oral delivered within the 10-minute limit with both extracts analysed
Week 8: Master revision sheet complete and final Paper 1 finished with time to spare