IB Global Politics HL study materials
IB Global Politics HL study resources

IB Global Politics HL study plan

IB Global Politics HL · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Power, sovereignty and international relations

  • Define and distinguish the four core concepts of power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence, and write one-paragraph definitions in your own words

  • Map the levels of analysis (individual, state, international, global) onto two contrasting real-world cases you choose yourself

  • Explain how realism, liberalism and constructivism each account for state behaviour under anarchy

  • Build a one-page glossary of 15 key terms from Domain 1 with a concrete example for each

Your checkpoint

A 600-word concept map plus 15-term glossary covering power, sovereignty and international relations, with each theory applied to at least one self-chosen case

Week 2

Power, sovereignty and international relations

  • Analyse how sovereignty is contested in practice, using cases such as secession, intervention, pooled sovereignty in regional organisations, and contested territory

  • Evaluate the roles of the UN, NATO, the WTO and regional bodies in shaping state behaviour

  • Compare hard, soft and smart power and apply each to a specific state's foreign policy

  • Practise writing a thesis statement that takes a clear position on whether sovereignty is eroding

Your checkpoint

One 700-word essay plan with a defensible thesis, three evidence-backed arguments and a counter-argument on whether state sovereignty is being eroded

Week 3

Power, sovereignty and international relations & Peace and conflict

  • Distinguish the causes, types and dynamics of conflict: interstate, intrastate, asymmetric and 'new wars'

  • Explain how the security dilemma, alliances and deterrence can both prevent and escalate conflict

  • Identify the main instruments of peace and conflict resolution, including mediation, peacekeeping, peacebuilding and sanctions

  • Apply one conflict case study of your choice to at least three theoretical frameworks

Your checkpoint

A comparative case table covering two conflicts, listing actors, causes, interventions and outcomes, plus a 400-word analytical commentary

Week 4

Power, sovereignty and international relations & Peace and conflict

  • Evaluate the effectiveness and limits of UN peacekeeping and collective security with reference to at least two operations

  • Assess how just war thinking and international humanitarian law constrain the conduct of war

  • Analyse the role of non-state armed groups and how they challenge state-centric models of conflict

  • Draft and time a full essay under exam conditions

Your checkpoint

A timed 60-minute practice essay on peace and conflict, self-marked against a criterion checklist with three specific improvement targets

Week 5

Human rights

  • Trace the development of the international human rights regime from the UDHR to the core treaties and monitoring bodies

  • Distinguish civil and political rights from economic, social and cultural rights, and explain the debates between them

  • Analyse tensions between human rights norms and state sovereignty, including non-interference and cultural relativism critiques

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of mechanisms such as treaty bodies, the Human Rights Council and international courts

Your checkpoint

A 500-word evaluation of whether international human rights mechanisms meaningfully constrain states, supported by at least three specific institutional examples

Week 6

Development

  • Compare competing measures and meanings of development, including GDP, HDI, Gini and multidimensional poverty indices

  • Explain how colonialism, dependency and global trade rules shape development outcomes

  • Evaluate the roles of the World Bank, IMF, WTO, NGOs and emerging donors in development

  • Assess how at least two Sustainable Development Goals interact and where progress has stalled

Your checkpoint

A 500-word briefing note comparing two countries' development trajectories using at least three different development indicators

Week 7

Political engagement and the engagement project (HL internal assessment) & Human rights

  • Define your engagement project question and justify its link to a course concept such as power, legitimacy or human rights

  • Select a method of political engagement, such as advocacy, campaigning, consultation or direct action, and justify the choice

  • Draft the written report structure, including rationale, evidence, reflection and evaluation of the engagement

  • Rehearse the oral presentation and prepare responses to likely examiner questions

Your checkpoint

A complete engagement project report draft with a rationale section, an evidence section and a reflection section, plus a rehearsed 10-minute presentation outline

Week 8

Political engagement and the engagement project (HL internal assessment) & Power, sovereignty and international relations & Peace and conflict

  • Revise and finalise the engagement project report and presentation materials

  • Synthesise the four examined domains into a single revision sheet of core concepts and case studies

  • Complete two timed mixed-domain practice essays and mark them against assessment criteria

  • Identify and patch the three weakest areas revealed by practice marking

Your checkpoint

A finalised engagement project submission and two self-marked timed essays with a written remediation plan for the identified weak areas

Milestones

Week 2: You can explain, in writing and without notes, how sovereignty and power interact in at least two contrasting cases, and you can state a defensible thesis on whether sovereignty is eroding

Week 4: You have completed one timed essay on peace and conflict, self-marked it, and listed three concrete improvement targets; you can also compare two conflicts using at least three theoretical frameworks

Week 6: You can compare at least three development indicators and evaluate at least three international institutions' development roles, and you can explain two tensions between human rights and sovereignty

Week 7: Your engagement project draft is complete with rationale, evidence and reflection sections, and you have rehearsed the oral presentation at least once

Week 8: The engagement project is finalised and submitted, and two mixed-domain timed essays have been self-marked with a written remediation plan