IB Global Politics SL study materials
IB Global Politics SL study resources

IB Global Politics SL cheat sheet

IB Global Politics SL · Keep the key ideas within reach.

Quick reference

Power, Sovereignty and International Relations

  • Power is the capacity to influence others' behaviour; hard power uses coercion (military, sanctions), soft power uses attraction (culture, values, legitimacy), smart power combines both.

  • Sovereignty has four dimensions: territory, population, authority, and recognition by other states; internal sovereignty means supreme authority within borders, external sovereignty means independence from outside interference.

  • The 1648 Peace of Westphalia is the conventional origin of the sovereign state system: no higher authority above the state, non-interference in domestic affairs.

  • Realism (Morgenthau, Waltz) assumes states are rational unitary actors pursuing survival and relative gains; liberalism emphasises institutions, interdependence, and absolute gains; constructivism holds that identities and norms constitute interests.

  • Anarchy in IR means absence of a world government, not chaos; self-help and the security dilemma follow, where one state's defensive build-up looks offensive to others.

  • Sovereignty is eroded by humanitarian intervention (responsibility to protect, 2005), international courts, IMF conditionality, and transnational corporations, but states retain legal equality.

  • The UN Security Council has five permanent members with veto power (China, France, Russia, UK, US) and ten elected members serving two-year terms.

  • Relative gains concern how much one state gains compared with another; absolute gains concern total benefit regardless of distribution - realists stress the former.

Quick reference

Human Rights

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) is non-binding; the two binding covenants are the ICCPR (civil and political) and the ICESCR (economic, social and cultural), both adopted 1966.

  • Three generations of rights: first (civil/political, 'liberty'), second (economic/social/cultural, 'equality'), third (collective/solidarity - development, peace, environment).

  • Civil and political rights are often framed as immediately enforceable and justiciable; economic and social rights are subject to 'progressive realisation' according to available resources.

  • The responsibility to protect (R2P), endorsed by the UN World Summit in 2005, covers genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity - not general human rights abuse.

  • Universalism holds rights apply to all people everywhere; cultural relativism argues rights must be read through local culture; the Vienna Declaration (1993) reaffirms universality while noting national and regional particularities.

  • Human rights enforcement mechanisms include treaty bodies, the Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review, special rapporteurs, and regional courts such as the European Court of Human Rights.

  • Derogation allows states to suspend certain rights during declared public emergencies, but rights such as freedom from torture are non-derogable.

  • The ICC (Rome Statute, 1998, in force 2002) prosecutes individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression under complementarity.

Quick reference

Development

  • GDP measures total output; GDP per capita divides by population; GNI adds net income from abroad; PPP adjusts for price differences to compare living standards.

  • The Human Development Index combines life expectancy, mean and expected years of schooling, and GNI per capita (PPP) into a geometric mean between 0 and 1.

  • The Gini coefficient ranges from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (perfect inequality); a rising Gini in a growing economy means growth is distributionally skewed.

  • Modernisation theory (Rostow's stages) predicts linear transition to industrial capitalism; dependency theory (Prebisch, Frank) argues the periphery is structurally exploited by the core.

  • The Washington Consensus (1989) prescribed liberalisation, privatisation, deregulation, and fiscal discipline; the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals replaced the MDGs with 17 goals to 2030.

  • The Brandt Line divides a wealthier global North from a poorer South; the term 'Global South' is now more political than strictly geographic.

  • Foreign aid types: bilateral vs multilateral, tied vs untied, humanitarian vs development, and ODA, where donors target 0.7% of GNI (UN target, rarely met).

  • Microfinance, remittances, and FDI are alternative development finance flows; remittances often exceed ODA in low-income countries.

Quick reference

Peace and Conflict

  • Galtung distinguishes direct violence (visible acts), structural violence (harm built into institutions, e.g. poverty, discrimination), and cultural violence (legitimising narratives).

  • Negative peace is the absence of direct violence; positive peace includes social justice and the absence of structural violence.

  • Conflict stages: latent, emergence, escalation, stalemate, de-escalation, settlement, post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation.

  • Conflict resolution vs conflict management vs conflict transformation: resolution addresses root causes, management contains symptoms, transformation changes relationships and structures.

  • Intrastate conflicts (civil wars) have outnumbered interstate wars since 1945; proxy wars involve external states backing local parties.

  • Peacekeeping principles: consent of parties, impartiality, and minimum use of force - traditional peacekeeping monitors ceasefires; multidimensional missions include civilian protection and institution-building.

  • The conflict trap (Collier) describes how poverty and weak institutions make relapse into civil war likely; roughly half of post-conflict states relapse within a decade.

  • Just war theory: jus ad bellum (just cause, proportionality, last resort, legitimate authority) and jus in bello (discrimination, proportionality, military necessity).

Quick reference

Political Engagement and Active Citizenship (Internal Assessment)

  • The internal assessment is an engagement activity: the student chooses a real political issue, engages with it (interview, survey, campaign, simulation, observation), then writes an analytical report with a clear research question.

  • The report structure: focus and research question, context and actors, evidence from the engagement, analysis linking evidence to political concepts, and conclusion.

  • The research question must be narrow, answerable, and political - it should identify a specific actor, decision, or outcome rather than a broad theme like 'poverty'.

  • Engagement must be documented: dates, participants, roles, and sources; primary evidence from the activity should be distinguishable from secondary research.

  • Political concepts to apply include power, legitimacy, authority, accountability, participation, representation, sovereignty, and citizenship.

  • A political issue involves collective decision-making, contested values, or the distribution of resources and power - a purely personal problem is not sufficient.

  • Analysis requires weighing evidence and considering counter-perspectives; description alone earns limited credit.

  • Active citizenship forms: voting, campaigning, petitioning, joining pressure groups, protesting, volunteering, contacting representatives, boycotting, and online activism.

Quick reference

Exam Technique and Synthesis

  • Paper 1 stimulus questions require using the provided source, but every question must also be answered with own knowledge; citing the source alone is insufficient.

  • Extended-response questions are marked on knowledge and conceptual understanding, application and analysis, and synthesis and evaluation.

  • Command words: 'describe' needs accurate detail, 'explain' needs causal links, 'evaluate' or 'discuss' needs a judgement supported by evidence on both sides.

  • Define key concepts (power, sovereignty, legitimacy, development) at first use; imprecise definitions cost conceptual marks.

  • Use contemporary, specific examples (named states, institutions, dates) rather than generic ones like 'some countries'.

  • A strong conclusion states a position and justifies it against the strongest counter-argument, not a restatement of both sides.

  • Case studies should be chosen to cross domains - for example, an intervention raising both human rights and sovereignty issues.

  • Link back to the research question or command word in each paragraph's topic sentence to maintain focus.