IB Global Politics SL study plan
IB Global Politics SL · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Power, sovereignty and international relations
Define power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence in your own words and map how each concept links to the others
Distinguish hard, soft and smart power and classify six real actors (states, IGOs, NGOs, MNCs) by the type of power they exercise
Explain how sovereignty is challenged by intervention, globalization and supranational bodies, using at least two concrete cases you can describe from memory
Build a concept glossary with one worked example per term
Your checkpoint
A one-page concept map of Domain 1 with 12+ terms, each linked to a named case
Power, sovereignty and international relations
Compare realist, liberal and constructivist readings of state behaviour and apply each to the same event
Analyse how IGOs and treaties constrain or enable state action in one case you can summarise in 150 words
Practise writing a thesis statement that takes a position on whether sovereignty is eroding
Self-mark one 10-mark response against IB-style criteria (knowledge, application, analysis)
Your checkpoint
Two 10-mark practice answers on Domain 1, self-marked with a written improvement note
Political engagement and active citizenship (internal assessment)
Identify a research question for the internal assessment that is political, local-to-global in scope and answerable with primary data
Draft a rationale that justifies the question against Domain 1 and 2 concepts already studied
Select two credible sources and evaluate their reliability and bias in writing
Design a data collection tool (survey, interview guide or document analysis grid) with 6-10 items
Your checkpoint
A one-page IA proposal: question, rationale, two sources evaluated, and the data collection tool
Political engagement and active citizenship (internal assessment)
Pilot the data collection tool with at least three respondents or documents and log what failed
Revise the tool to remove leading questions and add a consent or ethics note
Map each planned finding to the concept it will test
Write a 200-word methodology paragraph explaining choices and limits
Your checkpoint
Piloted, revised tool plus a 200-word methodology section with an ethics note
Human rights
Distinguish the three generations of rights and explain the tensions between them with examples
Explain how the UDHR, ICCPR and ICESCR differ in obligation and enforcement
Analyse one case where state security claims have been used to limit rights, weighing both sides
Evaluate the roles of courts, NGOs and the UN Human Rights Council in protecting rights
Your checkpoint
A comparative table of three rights instruments plus a 250-word case analysis
Development
Compare at least three measures of development (GDP per capita, HDI, Gini, multidimensional poverty) and state what each hides
Explain how colonial legacies, trade rules and debt shape development outcomes
Analyse one aid or development intervention and judge whether it built capability or dependency
Link one development claim to a human rights argument from Week 5
Your checkpoint
A 300-word argumentative response on whether aid reduces or reproduces inequality, with data cited
Peace and conflict
Distinguish interstate, intrastate, asymmetric and structural conflict with a named example for each
Explain the causes, conduct and limits of peacekeeping and evaluate one mission's record
Compare negative and positive peace and apply both to one post-conflict case
Assess how the laws of war and the responsibility to protect interact with sovereignty
Your checkpoint
A conflict case study of 400 words covering causes, actors, responses and a judgement on peacebuilding
Political engagement and active citizenship (internal assessment) & Power, sovereignty and international relations
Complete data collection and write up findings organised by concept rather than by question
Draw one conclusion that answers the research question directly and acknowledge counter-evidence
Revise the full IA draft for structure, sourcing and word count
Sit one timed mixed paper covering Domains 1-4 and mark it against the criteria
Your checkpoint
Complete IA draft with findings and conclusion, plus a marked timed paper
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain power and sovereignty in your own words and write a defensible thesis on whether sovereignty is eroding, without notes
Week 4: IA question is approved-quality: political, researchable and clearly linked to at least one taught concept; tool has been piloted and revised
Week 6: You can compare three development measures and connect a development argument to a human rights obligation in under 10 minutes of planning
Week 8: IA draft is complete and self-marked against criteria; timed paper shows you can structure answers across all four taught domains