IB Global Politics SL study materials
IB Global Politics SL study resources

IB Global Politics SL study plan

IB Global Politics SL · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Power, sovereignty and international relations

  • Define power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence in your own words and map how each concept links to the others

  • Distinguish hard, soft and smart power and classify six real actors (states, IGOs, NGOs, MNCs) by the type of power they exercise

  • Explain how sovereignty is challenged by intervention, globalization and supranational bodies, using at least two concrete cases you can describe from memory

  • Build a concept glossary with one worked example per term

Your checkpoint

A one-page concept map of Domain 1 with 12+ terms, each linked to a named case

Week 2

Power, sovereignty and international relations

  • Compare realist, liberal and constructivist readings of state behaviour and apply each to the same event

  • Analyse how IGOs and treaties constrain or enable state action in one case you can summarise in 150 words

  • Practise writing a thesis statement that takes a position on whether sovereignty is eroding

  • Self-mark one 10-mark response against IB-style criteria (knowledge, application, analysis)

Your checkpoint

Two 10-mark practice answers on Domain 1, self-marked with a written improvement note

Week 3

Political engagement and active citizenship (internal assessment)

  • Identify a research question for the internal assessment that is political, local-to-global in scope and answerable with primary data

  • Draft a rationale that justifies the question against Domain 1 and 2 concepts already studied

  • Select two credible sources and evaluate their reliability and bias in writing

  • Design a data collection tool (survey, interview guide or document analysis grid) with 6-10 items

Your checkpoint

A one-page IA proposal: question, rationale, two sources evaluated, and the data collection tool

Week 4

Political engagement and active citizenship (internal assessment)

  • Pilot the data collection tool with at least three respondents or documents and log what failed

  • Revise the tool to remove leading questions and add a consent or ethics note

  • Map each planned finding to the concept it will test

  • Write a 200-word methodology paragraph explaining choices and limits

Your checkpoint

Piloted, revised tool plus a 200-word methodology section with an ethics note

Week 5

Human rights

  • Distinguish the three generations of rights and explain the tensions between them with examples

  • Explain how the UDHR, ICCPR and ICESCR differ in obligation and enforcement

  • Analyse one case where state security claims have been used to limit rights, weighing both sides

  • Evaluate the roles of courts, NGOs and the UN Human Rights Council in protecting rights

Your checkpoint

A comparative table of three rights instruments plus a 250-word case analysis

Week 6

Development

  • Compare at least three measures of development (GDP per capita, HDI, Gini, multidimensional poverty) and state what each hides

  • Explain how colonial legacies, trade rules and debt shape development outcomes

  • Analyse one aid or development intervention and judge whether it built capability or dependency

  • Link one development claim to a human rights argument from Week 5

Your checkpoint

A 300-word argumentative response on whether aid reduces or reproduces inequality, with data cited

Week 7

Peace and conflict

  • Distinguish interstate, intrastate, asymmetric and structural conflict with a named example for each

  • Explain the causes, conduct and limits of peacekeeping and evaluate one mission's record

  • Compare negative and positive peace and apply both to one post-conflict case

  • Assess how the laws of war and the responsibility to protect interact with sovereignty

Your checkpoint

A conflict case study of 400 words covering causes, actors, responses and a judgement on peacebuilding

Week 8

Political engagement and active citizenship (internal assessment) & Power, sovereignty and international relations

  • Complete data collection and write up findings organised by concept rather than by question

  • Draw one conclusion that answers the research question directly and acknowledge counter-evidence

  • Revise the full IA draft for structure, sourcing and word count

  • Sit one timed mixed paper covering Domains 1-4 and mark it against the criteria

Your checkpoint

Complete IA draft with findings and conclusion, plus a marked timed paper

Milestones

Week 2: You can explain power and sovereignty in your own words and write a defensible thesis on whether sovereignty is eroding, without notes

Week 4: IA question is approved-quality: political, researchable and clearly linked to at least one taught concept; tool has been piloted and revised

Week 6: You can compare three development measures and connect a development argument to a human rights obligation in under 10 minutes of planning

Week 8: IA draft is complete and self-marked against criteria; timed paper shows you can structure answers across all four taught domains