SNBT Tes Literasi study plan

Identify the main idea and supporting details in three argumentative texts of 400–600 words each by annotating topic sentences and evidence.

Distinguish between explicit information and inferences in two informational texts by writing a one-sentence inference for each paragraph and labeling it as stated or implied.

Analyze the structure of two opinion articles by mapping claim, reasons, and evidence in a graphic organizer.

Define and apply five cohesive devices (e.g., however, therefore, moreover) by rewriting a short paragraph to improve coherence.

Compare and contrast the presentation of the same issue in two texts (one informational, one argumentative) by creating a Venn diagram of key points.

Evaluate the strength of evidence in an argumentative text by rating each piece of evidence as strong, moderate, or weak and justifying the rating.

Infer an author’s purpose and tone in two literary excerpts by selecting textual evidence that supports the inference.

Use context clues to deduce the meaning of eight unfamiliar words from a 500-word passage and verify with a dictionary.

Identify assumptions in two short arguments by completing the sentence: 'This argument assumes that...' for each.

Distinguish fact from opinion in a news article by highlighting facts in blue and opinions in red, then tallying the counts.

Assess the logical validity of three syllogisms by determining whether the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.

Explain how two common logical fallacies (e.g., ad hominem, false dilemma) appear in everyday advertisements and why they weaken an argument.

Summarize the main argument of two English-language opinion pieces (300–400 words) in 50 words each, capturing the thesis and key support.

Infer the meaning of six English idioms or phrasal verbs from context in a short story and use each in a new sentence.

Evaluate the credibility of two English-language online sources by checking author expertise, date, and evidence, and assign a credibility score (1–5).

Identify two unstated assumptions in an English-language editorial and explain how they affect the argument’s validity.

Analyze the structure of two English-language argumentative essays by outlining the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, noting transitions.

Distinguish between correlation and causation in two English-language news reports by identifying phrases that imply causation without evidence.

Assess the strength of an argument in a 400-word English editorial by listing its claims, evidence, and any logical gaps.

Paraphrase two complex English sentences from an academic text while preserving meaning and technical terms.

Interpret data from two tables and two graphs embedded in Indonesian news articles by writing two sentences that describe the main trend and one that notes an exception.

Calculate percentage change and proportion from numerical information in a 300-word text and explain the calculation in a short paragraph.

Identify misleading graphs (e.g., truncated axes, inconsistent scales) in two examples and explain why they are misleading.

Integrate numerical evidence into a written argument by drafting a 150-word paragraph that uses at least two data points from a provided text.

Complete a full-length practice test under timed conditions (90 minutes) and score it using the answer key.

Review all incorrect answers from the practice test by writing the reason for each mistake and the correct reasoning.

Identify the two domains with the lowest practice-test scores and list three specific skills to review for each.

Re-read two challenging texts from earlier weeks and answer three new inference questions about each.

Take a second full-length practice test (90 minutes) and compare scores with week 7 to measure improvement.

Review all incorrect answers from the second test and update the error log with new insights.

Create a one-page summary sheet of key strategies for each domain (e.g., annotation techniques, fact-opinion check, data interpretation steps).

Practice time management by completing 20 mixed-domain questions in 30 minutes and checking accuracy.