The Faded Colour, the Refund Demand and the Instagram Photos
Three weeks after a full-head colour at your salon, a regular client emails to say her colour has 'washed out', that her scalp stung for two days afterwards, and that she wants a full refund plus compensation; she adds that if she is not satisfied she will post before-and-after photographs online. Your records show a signed consultation form, a negative patch test recorded 48 hours before, and the formula 6/0 with 6% peroxide, 60% grey coverage, 35 minutes development, applied by a stylist who has since left. The consultation notes, written at the time, say the client washes her hair daily with a clarifying shampoo, uses a 2-in-1 conditioner, swims twice a week in a chlorinated pool, and had her hair in a hot tub on holiday. The manager is on leave; a junior stylist, wanting to help, offers her a free redo that afternoon and tells her 'we will sort the money out later'. The client also asks for copies of everything on file and asks you to take her photos off the salon's Instagram account; she says she agreed to the salon website but not to social media.
1. Assess the complaint fairly. What does the evidence suggest about cause and about the salon's position?
Read the worked answer
Read the file before responding, and separate the two complaints - fading and stinging.
Fading: 6/0 with 6% on 60% grey, developed for 35 minutes, is a legitimate formula for grey coverage, but it is not a long-lasting one. Contributing factors are in your own notes: daily washing with a clarifying shampoo (designed to strip), a 2-in-1 that conditions little, twice-weekly chlorinated swimming and a hot tub. Chlorine and heat both accelerate colour loss and shift tone. Three weeks is fast, but it is plausible with that regimen. That does not automatically make the salon at fault, but aftercare advice should have been given at consultation and recorded; if it was not, the salon carries some responsibility for the outcome.
Stinging for two days: possible causes include tint applied over a scalp with micro-abrasions from scratching or brushing, a developer strength too high for a sensitive scalp, or a genuine sensitivity. A negative 48-hour patch test does not rule out a delayed reaction or an irritant response. This is the more serious element and needs a face-to-face assessment, not an email argument.
Overall there may be shared responsibility, so do not concede fault or promise compensation before you have examined her scalp and the record.
2. Set out the sequence for handling the complaint, including the junior stylist's offer and the question of compensation.
Read the worked answer
Process, in order:
- Acknowledge within one working day, in writing, using her name, and state what happens next and when. Do not admit liability in that first reply, and do not ignore it.
- Book a face-to-face assessment with a senior stylist or the manager in a private area within a few days. Inspect the scalp and hair, take notes, and compare the hair against the record.
- Stop the junior's offer. A free redo promised on the spot, before assessment, commits the salon and can make matters worse if the scalp is still irritated. Only a manager should authorise a remedy.
- Decide the remedy on evidence. If the colour is genuinely off-specification, offer a corrective colour or a refund of the colour service. If the main cause is home care, offer a goodwill toner or gloss plus a written aftercare plan, and say plainly what you are offering and why.
- Separate remedy from compensation. Putting it right is not the same as paying for distress or loss. Keep any goodwill gesture proportionate, put it in writing, and make clear it is goodwill without admission of liability.
- Give a written outcome within your published complaints timescale with a named contact, and signpost her to the relevant consumer body if she remains unhappy.
- Close the loop internally: build aftercare advice into every consultation, add a 'home care discussed' checkbox to the record, and remind staff that only managers authorise refunds.
3. How do you handle her request for copies of her records and for removal of the Instagram photographs?
Read the worked answer
Two separate rights are engaged.
Access: she is entitled to a copy of her personal data - consultation form, patch test record, colour formula, notes and emails. Provide it within one month of the request (extendable by two further months for complex requests, with notice). Before sending, redact anything that is not her personal data: other clients' names, and staff comments that are opinions about third parties. She does not get material that identifies someone else without their consent. Log the request and your response.
Photographs: consent is purpose-specific. If she agreed to the website but not to Instagram, the Instagram use falls outside the consent she gave. The correct response is to remove them promptly and confirm in writing that you have done so, and to check whether they were used anywhere else - stories, paid ads, the Google profile. Do not argue about it; continuing to publish after consent is withdrawn is the risk, not the removal.
Going forward: use a consent form that lists each channel separately, records the date, and states how consent can be withdrawn. Store it with the client record, and make sure whoever runs the account checks it before posting.