CFM study materials
CFM study resources

CAM Reconciliation and Reserve Shortfall on an Office Campus

CFM · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

CAM Reconciliation and Reserve Shortfall on an Office Campus

The owner of a 240,000 ft² suburban office campus with 12 tenants and 78% occupancy is reviewing the 2024 operating budget. The budget is $8.2 million, but year-to-date expenses are running 11% over. Energy is up 19% because of a hotter summer and a chiller plant operating at 0.95 kW/ton; janitorial is up 7% from a contract escalator; snow removal is $140,000 over budget after two major storms. Real estate taxes are under appeal, but the assessor has not issued a decision. The reserve balance is $1.1 million against a replacement-cost estimate of $4.8 million; a roof and 14 rooftop units will need $2.6 million in three years. Three large tenants have base-year leases with operating-expense stops, and the anchor tenant's lease expires in 18 months. The owner wants to hold the 2025 operating budget flat and use reserves to cover the overrun.

1. Analyze the variance and identify which costs are controllable, recoverable, or structurally underfunded.

Read the worked answer

Start by splitting the 11% overrun by driver and lease treatment. Energy is partly market-driven, but 0.95 kW/ton suggests an operational and capital opportunity; it may be recoverable only above base-year stops, so the gross-up and stop calculations matter. Snow removal may be recoverable if the lease includes it as an operating expense and the amount is reasonable, but caps and exclusions must be checked. Janitorial is contractual and largely controllable through scope and escalation review at renewal. Real estate taxes are uncertain until the appeal is decided; do not assume a refund. The reserve shortfall is not an operating variance. A $1.1 million reserve against a $4.8 million replacement estimate is about 23% funded, and $2.6 million of roof/RTU work is only three years away. Using reserves to cover operating overruns would convert a capital problem into a deferred-maintenance and tenant-risk problem. The analysis should separate recoverable tenant costs, owner-controllable costs, and structural underfunding.

2. Recommend a 2025 budget and reserve strategy. What would you say to the owner about using reserves for the overrun?

Read the worked answer

I would recommend a reforecast rather than a flat budget. Build the 2025 budget from current contracts, a weather-normalized energy baseline, and a probability-weighted tax appeal outcome. Target savings through retrocommissioning, chiller sequencing, lighting controls, janitorial scope review, and competitive snow-removal contracts with threshold triggers. For reserves, adopt a funded reserve study with annual contributions tied to the roof/RTU replacement schedule, not to operating gaps. Tell the owner clearly: using reserves for operating overruns masks the problem, reduces capital capacity, and may violate loan covenants or disclosure expectations. If a one-time draw is unavoidable, document it as a loan to the operating budget with a repayment schedule. Also stress-test the anchor-tenant expiration: an 18-month rollover could create vacancy and abatement exposure, so preserve liquidity. The judgment is to fix the operating structure and protect capital reserves, not to choose the easiest accounting move.

3. How should tenant communication and CAM reconciliation be handled?

Read the worked answer

Reconcile by lease, not by averages. Prepare a tenant-by-tenant schedule showing gross-up calculations, base-year stops, caps, exclusions, and supporting invoices. For the three base-year tenants, verify whether energy, snow, and tax costs are recoverable and whether the lease requires a specific notice period. Send a concise explanation of the variance drivers and the appeal status before issuing reconciliation statements. Avoid calling an estimate final; label it preliminary where the tax appeal is unresolved. If the owner wants to hold the budget flat, explain that tenants are entitled to accurate reconciliations and that understating costs now can create a larger true-up later. Offer payment plans where appropriate, and document all tenant questions. Good communication protects cash flow and reduces dispute risk while preserving the owner's right to recover allowable costs.