IHMM CSHM study plan
IHMM CSHM · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
Hazard analysis
Build a personal glossary of hazard analysis terms (hazard vs. risk, exposure, severity, probability, risk score) and write one-sentence definitions in your own words
Compare qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative risk assessment methods and list when each is appropriate
Construct a blank risk matrix with defined likelihood and severity scales and justify each anchor point
Select one real process from your workplace or a public case study and draft a preliminary hazard list using task decomposition
Your checkpoint
A one-page hazard inventory for a chosen task with at least 15 hazards, each tagged by hazard category (physical, chemical, ergonomic, energy, human factors)
Hazard analysis
Apply a structured technique (HAZOP, FMEA, or what-if analysis) to the task chosen in week 1 and document the worksheet logic
Rank the identified hazards using the risk matrix and defend the top five rankings in writing
Map each top-ranked hazard to a control using the hierarchy of controls and explain why lower-level controls were rejected
Identify applicable exposure limits, consensus standards, or regulatory thresholds that apply to at least three of the hazards
Your checkpoint
A completed risk assessment worksheet with ranked hazards, assigned controls, residual risk scores, and a short justification memo for the control selection
Accident investigation
Differentiate incident, accident, near miss, and unsafe condition, and classify five sample scenarios correctly
Outline the sequence of an investigation from scene preservation through evidence collection, interviews, causal analysis, and corrective action tracking
Practice interviewing technique by writing ten open-ended questions and identifying which are leading or closed
Compare causal analysis tools (5 Whys, fishbone, fault tree, events and causal factors chart) and select one for each of three scenario types
Your checkpoint
A mock investigation report for a fabricated near-miss scenario containing timeline, evidence log, interview notes, causal analysis, and at least five corrective actions with owners and due dates
Accident investigation
Distinguish root cause from contributing cause and direct cause in your mock report and revise any mislabeled findings
Evaluate corrective actions for adequacy, checking that each addresses a systemic cause rather than only individual behavior
Design a metric set for investigation program effectiveness (closure rate, recurrence rate, time to report, repeat-finding rate)
Explain recordkeeping and reporting obligations that apply to fatalities, hospitalizations, and significant incidents under the applicable jurisdiction
Your checkpoint
A revised investigation report plus a one-page corrective action tracking sheet and a written critique of your own first-draft causal analysis
Safety audits
Distinguish compliance audits, management system audits, and program effectiveness evaluations and state the purpose of each
Draft a 25-item audit checklist mapped to a recognized management system framework, citing the clause or requirement behind each item
Write audit evidence rules that separate observation, interview, and document review, and specify what constitutes sufficient evidence
Plan an audit logistics package covering scope, criteria, sampling strategy, opening meeting, and closing meeting
Your checkpoint
A complete audit plan and checklist package for one facility area, including scope statement, criteria list, sampling rationale, and schedule
Safety audits
Write five sample nonconformity findings in the correct format: requirement, evidence, and gap
Classify findings by severity and justify each classification against defined criteria
Design a corrective action request workflow with verification of effectiveness and closure authority
Identify common audit pitfalls (scope creep, halo effect, sampling bias, checklist dependence) and describe a mitigation for each
Your checkpoint
A mock audit report with at least five well-formed findings, severity classifications, corrective action requests, and a verification plan
Workers' compensation, product safety, environmental laws, labor relations, and business and financial principles
Trace the workers' compensation claim lifecycle from injury report through compensability determination, benefits, and return-to-work
Explain experience modification, premium calculation inputs, and how claim frequency and severity affect cost
Summarize the core obligations of the main product safety and environmental statutes in your jurisdiction and the reporting duties they create
Describe how labor relations, collective bargaining agreements, and joint safety committees affect safety program implementation
Your checkpoint
A cost-impact worksheet showing how three hypothetical claims of differing severity affect premium and experience modification, with a written explanation of each input
Hazard analysis & Accident investigation & Safety audits & Workers' compensation, product safety, environmental laws, labor relations, and business and financial principles
Synthesize the four domains by writing a business case memo that links a hazard finding, an incident trend, an audit gap, and a cost projection into one recommendation
Complete timed practice sets across all domains and log every missed item by domain and error type
Re-review only the logged weak areas and rewrite your personal glossary with corrections
Build a one-page exam-day reference sheet of formulas, hierarchies, and process steps you must recall from memory
Your checkpoint
A business case memo plus a scored practice log showing domain-level accuracy and a prioritized list of remaining weak areas
Milestones
Week 2: Can produce a ranked hazard list with defensible risk scores and hierarchy-of-controls justification without notes in under 30 minutes
Week 4: Can explain the full investigation sequence and distinguish root, contributing, and direct causes using a fresh scenario with no reference material
Week 6: Can write a properly formatted nonconformity finding (requirement, evidence, gap) in under five minutes and classify its severity
Week 8: Practice log shows at least 75 percent accuracy in every domain, with no domain below 70 percent, and the reference sheet is complete