IHMM CSHM study materials
IHMM CSHM study resources

IHMM CSHM study plan

IHMM CSHM · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 7 hours per week

Week 1

Hazard analysis

  • Build a personal glossary of hazard analysis terms (hazard vs. risk, exposure, severity, probability, risk score) and write one-sentence definitions in your own words

  • Compare qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative risk assessment methods and list when each is appropriate

  • Construct a blank risk matrix with defined likelihood and severity scales and justify each anchor point

  • Select one real process from your workplace or a public case study and draft a preliminary hazard list using task decomposition

Your checkpoint

A one-page hazard inventory for a chosen task with at least 15 hazards, each tagged by hazard category (physical, chemical, ergonomic, energy, human factors)

Week 2

Hazard analysis

  • Apply a structured technique (HAZOP, FMEA, or what-if analysis) to the task chosen in week 1 and document the worksheet logic

  • Rank the identified hazards using the risk matrix and defend the top five rankings in writing

  • Map each top-ranked hazard to a control using the hierarchy of controls and explain why lower-level controls were rejected

  • Identify applicable exposure limits, consensus standards, or regulatory thresholds that apply to at least three of the hazards

Your checkpoint

A completed risk assessment worksheet with ranked hazards, assigned controls, residual risk scores, and a short justification memo for the control selection

Week 3

Accident investigation

  • Differentiate incident, accident, near miss, and unsafe condition, and classify five sample scenarios correctly

  • Outline the sequence of an investigation from scene preservation through evidence collection, interviews, causal analysis, and corrective action tracking

  • Practice interviewing technique by writing ten open-ended questions and identifying which are leading or closed

  • Compare causal analysis tools (5 Whys, fishbone, fault tree, events and causal factors chart) and select one for each of three scenario types

Your checkpoint

A mock investigation report for a fabricated near-miss scenario containing timeline, evidence log, interview notes, causal analysis, and at least five corrective actions with owners and due dates

Week 4

Accident investigation

  • Distinguish root cause from contributing cause and direct cause in your mock report and revise any mislabeled findings

  • Evaluate corrective actions for adequacy, checking that each addresses a systemic cause rather than only individual behavior

  • Design a metric set for investigation program effectiveness (closure rate, recurrence rate, time to report, repeat-finding rate)

  • Explain recordkeeping and reporting obligations that apply to fatalities, hospitalizations, and significant incidents under the applicable jurisdiction

Your checkpoint

A revised investigation report plus a one-page corrective action tracking sheet and a written critique of your own first-draft causal analysis

Week 5

Safety audits

  • Distinguish compliance audits, management system audits, and program effectiveness evaluations and state the purpose of each

  • Draft a 25-item audit checklist mapped to a recognized management system framework, citing the clause or requirement behind each item

  • Write audit evidence rules that separate observation, interview, and document review, and specify what constitutes sufficient evidence

  • Plan an audit logistics package covering scope, criteria, sampling strategy, opening meeting, and closing meeting

Your checkpoint

A complete audit plan and checklist package for one facility area, including scope statement, criteria list, sampling rationale, and schedule

Week 6

Safety audits

  • Write five sample nonconformity findings in the correct format: requirement, evidence, and gap

  • Classify findings by severity and justify each classification against defined criteria

  • Design a corrective action request workflow with verification of effectiveness and closure authority

  • Identify common audit pitfalls (scope creep, halo effect, sampling bias, checklist dependence) and describe a mitigation for each

Your checkpoint

A mock audit report with at least five well-formed findings, severity classifications, corrective action requests, and a verification plan

Week 7

Workers' compensation, product safety, environmental laws, labor relations, and business and financial principles

  • Trace the workers' compensation claim lifecycle from injury report through compensability determination, benefits, and return-to-work

  • Explain experience modification, premium calculation inputs, and how claim frequency and severity affect cost

  • Summarize the core obligations of the main product safety and environmental statutes in your jurisdiction and the reporting duties they create

  • Describe how labor relations, collective bargaining agreements, and joint safety committees affect safety program implementation

Your checkpoint

A cost-impact worksheet showing how three hypothetical claims of differing severity affect premium and experience modification, with a written explanation of each input

Week 8

Hazard analysis & Accident investigation & Safety audits & Workers' compensation, product safety, environmental laws, labor relations, and business and financial principles

  • Synthesize the four domains by writing a business case memo that links a hazard finding, an incident trend, an audit gap, and a cost projection into one recommendation

  • Complete timed practice sets across all domains and log every missed item by domain and error type

  • Re-review only the logged weak areas and rewrite your personal glossary with corrections

  • Build a one-page exam-day reference sheet of formulas, hierarchies, and process steps you must recall from memory

Your checkpoint

A business case memo plus a scored practice log showing domain-level accuracy and a prioritized list of remaining weak areas

Milestones

Week 2: Can produce a ranked hazard list with defensible risk scores and hierarchy-of-controls justification without notes in under 30 minutes

Week 4: Can explain the full investigation sequence and distinguish root, contributing, and direct causes using a fresh scenario with no reference material

Week 6: Can write a properly formatted nonconformity finding (requirement, evidence, gap) in under five minutes and classify its severity

Week 8: Practice log shows at least 75 percent accuracy in every domain, with no domain below 70 percent, and the reference sheet is complete