AIL LET study plan
AIL LET · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 7 hours per week
B.A.LL.B.(Hons.) - Test Pattern and Syllabus & B.Com.LL.B.(Hons.) - Test Pattern and Syllabus
Map the B.A.LL.B.(Hons.) and B.Com.LL.B.(Hons.) written-test components onto a one-page grid showing which sections overlap (English, general awareness, legal aptitude, reasoning, quantitative) and which differ (commerce/accounting emphasis in the B.Com. route)
Draft a 40-item self-diagnostic covering legal aptitude, logical reasoning, and English usage, then score it to rank your three weakest areas
Build a daily 20-minute current-affairs routine (one national, one international, one legal-policy item) with a running one-line summary per item
Write down the eligibility, age, and qualifying-mark rules for both integrated programmes from official prospectuses so you know which route you are actually targeting
Your checkpoint
A one-page domain-overlap grid plus a scored 40-item diagnostic with your three weakest areas ranked
B.A.LL.B.(Hons.) - Test Pattern and Syllabus & B.Com.LL.B.(Hons.) - Test Pattern and Syllabus
Drill legal aptitude under time pressure: complete 60 questions on legal maxims, constitutional basics, and tort/contract fundamentals in 60 minutes and log accuracy by subtopic
Practise 30 reading-comprehension and para-jumble items, then rewrite each wrong answer as a one-sentence rule you broke
Solve 25 quantitative and data-interpretation items from the commerce-leaning set so the B.Com.LL.B. numerical section stops being a blind spot
Convert your current-affairs notes into 30 flashcards covering constitutional amendments, recent statutes, and landmark judgments
Your checkpoint
A timed 60-question legal-aptitude attempt with an accuracy table by subtopic and 30 finished flashcards
LL.M. - Test Pattern and Syllabus
Outline the LL.M. written-test syllabus section by section and assign each section a confidence score from 1 to 5
Summarise the core doctrine of 12 leading constitutional and criminal-law judgments in three lines each, citing the principle rather than the facts
Write two full-length essay-style answers under 30-minute limits on a constitutional-law proposition and a jurisprudence question
Compile a 25-term glossary of Latin maxims and doctrinal phrases you can define without notes
Your checkpoint
A 12-case doctrinal summary sheet plus two timed essays with self-marked rubrics
LL.M.- Tech. Policy - Test Pattern and Syllabus & IP - Joint Masters/LL.M. - Written Test Pattern
Compare the LL.M. Tech Policy and IP Joint Masters written tests on a two-column sheet: shared law-of-intellectual-property base versus policy, economics, and technology-governance additions
Draft one-page issue notes on patentability, copyright exceptions, trademark distinctiveness, and data protection as they arise in tech-policy questions
Practise two policy-analysis answers that state a position, cite a statutory or treaty anchor, and address a counter-argument
Collect five recent regulatory developments (data protection, AI governance, digital markets) and write a two-line policy implication for each
Your checkpoint
A comparative syllabus sheet for domains 4 and 5 plus two policy answers scored against a position-evidence-counterargument rubric
PGIP - MA/LLM Degree in Insolvency - Test Pattern and Syllabus
Map the insolvency-law test syllabus: insolvency and bankruptcy framework, corporate resolution process, individual insolvency, cross-border aspects, and allied commercial law
Build a flowchart of the corporate insolvency resolution process from default to resolution or liquidation, marking every statutory timeline and authority
Define 20 insolvency terms (resolution professional, committee of creditors, moratorium, avoidance transactions, liquidation estate) in one sentence each without notes
Answer 15 short insolvency questions and tag each error as definitional, procedural, or timeline-related
Your checkpoint
A one-page CIRP flowchart with statutory timelines plus a 20-term insolvency glossary
Ph.D. - Test Pattern and Syllabus
Read the Ph.D. test pattern and draft a two-page research proposal skeleton: problem statement, research questions, literature gap, methodology, and expected contribution
Write a 400-word critical literature review of three articles in your intended research area, identifying the gap you would fill
Practise two research-methodology answers on hypothesis framing, sampling, and doctrinal versus empirical approaches
Prepare a five-minute spoken defence of your proposal and record it to check clarity and structure
Your checkpoint
A two-page research proposal skeleton with a 400-word literature-gap review
B.A.LL.B.(Hons.) - Test Pattern and Syllabus & LL.M. - Test Pattern and Syllabus
Take one full-length mock for your primary integrated-programme route and one for LL.M., then tabulate section-wise accuracy against time spent
Re-teach your five weakest subtopics by writing a half-page explainer for each without consulting notes
Reduce your current-affairs flashcards to the 20 items you still miss and review them daily
Cut your average per-question time by 10 percent on reasoning and legal-aptitude sets through two timed sprints
Your checkpoint
Two full-length mock scores with a section-wise accuracy-versus-time table and five self-written explainers
LL.M.- Tech. Policy - Test Pattern and Syllabus & PGIP - MA/LLM Degree in Insolvency - Test Pattern and Syllabus & Ph.D. - Test Pattern and Syllabus
Run a consolidated revision sweep across tech-policy, insolvency, and Ph.D. material using only your own summaries and glossaries
Take one final timed mock per active route and compare scores against your week-1 diagnostic to quantify improvement
Finalise a one-page exam-day plan per route covering section order, time budgets, and skip rules
Assemble a single revision pack of no more than 15 pages that you can re-read in the final 48 hours
Your checkpoint
A 15-page consolidated revision pack plus a one-page exam-day time-budget plan for each route you are sitting
Milestones
Week 2: You can state which sections the B.A.LL.B. and B.Com.LL.B. tests share and score at least 60 percent on the timed 60-question legal-aptitude set
Week 4: You can explain in writing how the Tech Policy and IP Joint Masters tests differ and have two policy answers that each cite a statutory or treaty anchor
Week 6: Your CIRP flowchart shows every statutory timeline correctly and your research proposal skeleton names a specific literature gap
Week 8: Final mock scores exceed your week-1 diagnostic by at least 15 percentage points on your primary route, and your revision pack is complete