Assam TET LP study plan
Assam TET LP · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Child Development and Pedagogy
Map the Child Development and Pedagogy syllabus into a one-page checklist of every sub-topic, marking each as known, shaky, or unknown.
Define and write in your own words the key developmental concepts (growth versus development, heredity versus environment, stages of development) with one Indian classroom example each.
Build a 40-item practice set on developmental principles and record your baseline score and error types.
Your checkpoint
A completed one-page syllabus checklist with confidence ratings plus a logged baseline score on a 40-item Child Development and Pedagogy practice set.
Child Development and Pedagogy
Explain Piaget's stages and Vygotsky's sociocultural theory in writing, including the Zone of Proximal Development and scaffolding, with two classroom applications each.
Compare Kohlberg's moral development stages and describe how a teacher's questioning can support moral reasoning at the conventional level.
Distinguish learning theories (behaviourism, cognitivism, constructivism, social learning) by matching ten classroom scenarios to the theory they best illustrate.
Draft ten original multiple-choice questions on learning theories with justified correct answers and plausible distractors.
Your checkpoint
A two-page theory comparison chart plus ten self-written multiple-choice questions with answer rationales.
Child Development and Pedagogy
Summarise intelligence theories (Gardner's multiple intelligences, Guilford, Spearman) and explain how they inform inclusive lesson planning.
Diagnose and describe common learning difficulties and disabilities, and list the classroom accommodation each requires.
Explain assessment types (formative, summative, diagnostic, portfolio) and write two sample formative assessment tasks for a lower primary lesson.
Solve 60 mixed Child Development and Pedagogy questions under timed conditions and categorise every mistake by cause.
Your checkpoint
An error log for 60 timed questions showing each mistake's cause and the corrective action you will take.
Language I
List the grammar and usage areas tested in Language I and rate your confidence on each, then rank the five weakest for targeted practice.
Complete 100 grammar and usage items (tense, voice, articles, prepositions, concord) and record accuracy per area.
Write three short original passages and construct comprehension questions on main idea, inference, and vocabulary in context.
Memorise the pedagogy terms for language teaching (L1 versus L2 acquisition, communicative approach, skimming versus scanning) and define each in one sentence.
Your checkpoint
An accuracy table for 100 grammar items showing per-area percentages and the three weakest areas identified for re-drilling.
Language I & Language II
Apply a fixed three-pass method (skim, read questions, scan) to six unseen comprehension passages and log time and accuracy for each.
Practise ten sentence-transformation and error-correction sets in Language I, writing the rule that justifies each answer.
Identify the structure of the Language II paper and complete one full timed section, then analyse where time was lost.
Compile 30 vocabulary items (idioms, synonyms, antonyms) into a spaced-repetition deck and review it daily.
Your checkpoint
A timing and accuracy log for six comprehension passages plus one full timed Language II section with a written time-loss analysis.
Language II
Complete 80 grammar and vocabulary items in Language II and record accuracy by item type.
Write two original short compositions (one descriptive, one argumentative) within 20 minutes each and self-edit against a checklist of structure, grammar, and clarity.
Explain the pedagogy of language assessment, including how to give corrective feedback without discouraging learners, in a one-page note.
Review the spaced-repetition deck and retire items you now answer correctly three times in a row.
Your checkpoint
Two timed original compositions with marked self-edit checklists and a Language II accuracy summary by item type.
Mathematics and Environmental Studies (Lower Primary) / Mathematics and Science or Social Studies (Upper Primary)
Map the Domain 4 syllabus (Mathematics and Environmental Studies for Lower Primary, or Mathematics and Science or Social Studies for Upper Primary) and list every formula, concept, and topic cluster.
Solve 50 mathematics problems spanning number operations, fractions, measurement, and geometry, and rework every wrong answer until correct unaided.
Answer 60 Environmental Studies or Science or Social Studies items and convert each error into a one-line fact card.
Write two original pedagogical questions on teaching mathematics or EVS concepts, with model answers grounded in child development principles.
Your checkpoint
A formula and fact sheet created entirely from your own errors, plus a corrected rework log for all 50 mathematics problems.
Child Development and Pedagogy & Language I & Language II & Mathematics and Environmental Studies (Lower Primary) / Mathematics and Science or Social Studies (Upper Primary)
Take two full-length mock tests under exam conditions and score each section against its 25 percent weighting.
Re-teach your five weakest sub-topics from any domain by writing a one-page explainer for each without notes.
Revise every error-log entry from Weeks 1 to 7 and mark each as resolved or still open.
Finalise exam-day logistics: admit card, identity documents, centre route, and a timed section-order strategy.
Your checkpoint
Two scored full-length mock tests with a section-wise comparison against the 25 percent weighting and a final list of open weak spots.
Milestones
Week 2: You can explain Piaget, Vygotsky, and Kohlberg from memory and have written ten original Child Development and Pedagogy questions with rationales.
Week 4: Your Child Development and Pedagogy error log shows a rising timed-question score, and your Language I grammar accuracy table identifies the three weakest areas.
Week 6: You complete unseen comprehension passages within time at acceptable accuracy and have produced two self-edited original compositions in Language II.
Week 8: Both full-length mock tests are scored section-wise, and no domain falls below 50 percent in the second attempt.