The 'Clinically Proven' Green Tea
Sunleaf, a Guwahati-based tea company with ₹6 crore turnover, plans to launch a tulsi green tea with an advertising budget of ₹48 lakh. The agency proposes ₹30 lakh on regional television, ₹8 lakh on print, ₹6 lakh on radio and ₹4 lakh on outdoor. Digital gets nothing because 'our buyers are 35-plus'. The pack and television script say 'clinically proven to reduce 4 kg in 30 days', based on an internal study of 12 employees over three weeks with no control group. The company also wants a doctor's endorsement. The target is women aged 25-45 in Guwahati, Jorhat, Silchar and Dibrugarh; 60% of category sales are in general trade and e-commerce is growing. Competitors spend about ₹1.5 crore.
1. Evaluate the weight-loss claim and the proposed doctor's endorsement from a legal and ethical standpoint. What must change before the advertisement runs?
Read the worked answer
The claim is indefensible. A 12-person, three-week, uncontrolled internal study cannot support 'clinically proven', and 'reduce 4 kg in 30 days' is a weight-reduction claim that also invites scrutiny under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act and FSSAI's advertising and claims rules. Under the Consumer Protection Act 2019, the CCPA can act against misleading advertisements, and ASCI's code requires claims to be substantiated and not to exploit consumers' lack of knowledge. A doctor's endorsement does not cure a weak study; if the professional is paid, that must be disclosed, and the endorsement must reflect genuine professional judgement. Replace the claim with truthful, verifiable content - for example, 'contains tulsi and green tea' or 'no added colour' - drop the weight-loss number, maintain a substantiation file, and obtain legal and regulatory review before the script is shot. Changing the copy now is cheaper than defending it later.
2. Reallocate the ₹48 lakh budget across media, with reasons. Address the agency's zero-digital recommendation.
Read the worked answer
Reject zero digital. Urban women aged 25-45 in Guwahati, Jorhat, Silchar and Dibrugarh are reachable on social and video platforms, and ₹48 lakh cannot buy meaningful television frequency against a ₹1.5 crore competitor. A reasoned split: ₹14 lakh regional television for reach and credibility in the launch month; ₹12 lakh digital (video plus social, geo-targeted, with coupon codes and a landing page); ₹6 lakh radio for local frequency and general-trade spillover; ₹5 lakh print for the Assamese press and trade; ₹4 lakh outdoor near retail clusters; ₹4 lakh point-of-sale and dealer activation; ₹3 lakh contingency and measurement. Set reach and frequency goals rather than spending by habit - for example, 60% reach and three-plus exposures in the four launch towns. Negotiate television on cost per rating point and digital on cost per completed view and cost per trial, not impressions alone.
3. How would you test and measure advertising effectiveness on this budget, before and after launch?
Read the worked answer
Pre-test the copy before spend: a small concept and comprehension test with 60-80 target buyers in two towns, checking what the advertisement claims, what they remember, and whether the claim is believable without being misleading. Test the pack and the price. During launch, use coupon codes, a toll-free or WhatsApp number, and dealer redemption to trace where trial comes from. Post-launch tracking at four and eight weeks: unaided and aided awareness, ad recall, correct claim recall, trial, repeat purchase, and dealer stock movement. Compare launch towns with two matched control towns where only trade activity runs, so sales uplift is not confused with the season. Measure cost per trial and cost per repeat buyer by medium. Stop any medium whose cost per trial is more than double the best performer, and move the money to channels producing repeat purchase, not just awareness.