Who Is Speaking in the Monsoon Stanza?
A student has submitted a commentary on a four-line Sanskrit stanza for the school magazine. The stanza begins with the vocative sakhi, refers to an absent lover in the third person (sa kim smarati, 'does he remember?'), and describes a dark cloud that resembles the lover's body. The commentary calls the poem a fragment of dūtakāvya and says the speaker is a messenger addressing the cloud as his envoy. A second student objects that the speaker is the woman addressing her friend, and that the cloud is only a comparison. The magazine deadline is in two days; the teacher has 90 minutes of class time to settle the dispute, correct the commentary, and decide whether the poem should be printed with a gloss. The class has not yet studied dūtakāvya formally, but it has done rasa and alaṅkāra. The stanza contains no proper names; the verb forms are present tense; the metre is not in dispute.
1. Decide who is speaking and whether the poem is a dūtakāvya fragment, using the vocative and the pronouns.
Read the worked answer
sakhi is a feminine vocative, so the addressee is a female friend. A cloud addressed as a messenger would require a masculine vocative such as he megha. sa in sa kim smarati is masculine and refers to the absent lover, not to the cloud as an envoy. The speaker is therefore the nayikā speaking to her friend about the departed lover; the cloud is a point of comparison. Dūtakāvya requires the messenger to be addressed and sent, usually with imperatives; here there is no sending. The commentary has inverted the frame: it has turned a separation lyric into a messenger poem. The teacher can use the masculine and feminine endings as the decisive evidence, since they are visible in the text and do not require prior knowledge of dūtakāvya.
2. Identify the figure of speech and the rasa, explaining what in the stanza supports each.
Read the worked answer
The figure is upamā if the stanza says the cloud is like the lover's body; if it says the cloud is the lover, it is utprekṣā or rūpaka. The student should name the figure from the actual wording, not from the mere presence of a cloud. The rasa is śṛṅgāra in its vipralambha or separation mode, with a karuṇa undertone. The dark cloud supports this because it simultaneously recalls the lover and belongs to the rainy season, the conventional season of longing. The present-tense verbs and the question 'does he remember?' keep the speaker in suspense rather than in fulfilled union, which is why the separation mode, not union, is the right description.
3. How should the teacher edit the commentary and the printed gloss within the two-day deadline?
Read the worked answer
Print the poem with a two-line gloss: sakhi means female friend; sa means he, the absent lover. Correct the commentary to say that the speaker is the nayikā and that the cloud is a simile or imagined identification, not a messenger. Add a note that dūtakāvya is a later generic frame that could be applied, but the stanza itself does not address the cloud. If space is tight, drop the full commentary and keep the gloss; a wrong commentary is worse than none. The teacher should also give the student a short written explanation so that the correction is educational rather than merely editorial.