Rewriting a Locker-Charge Notice Before It Reaches 42,000 Customers
The Raipur main branch must put a one-page notice into the hands of 42,000 locker holders before 1 April, when rent moves from a single annual debit to two half-yearly debits and unpaid rent starts attracting a penal charge. Two drafts are on the manager's desk. Draft A says: 'Customers who have not paid arrears on the first of every month will be charged ₹450 at the rate of 2% per month.' Draft B says: 'Locker rent will be debited half-yearly. Arrears, if any, will attract a penal charge of 2% per month on the outstanding rent until paid.' A clerk argues the drafts are 'more or less the same' and wants to release Draft A because it is shorter. The fee table in both drafts spells 'principal' as 'principle', and both end with the line 'The bank will not be responsible for any loss.' The branch head wants a notice that would survive a consumer-forum complaint and still sound courteous to a forty-year depositor.
1. Draft A is defective in at least two distinct ways. Identify both defects and produce a rewritten version of the sentence that removes them.
Read the worked answer
Draft A fails on two counts, and neither can be cured by punctuation.
Defect 1 - frequency. 'On the first of every month' tells the customer something happens monthly, while the covering letter says rent is now debited half-yearly. A customer who reads only Draft A will budget monthly, then argue that the branch has debited twice in a year without notice. The notice contradicts itself on the one fact it exists to communicate.
Defect 2 - the money. 'Charged ₹450 at the rate of 2% per month' attaches a fixed rupee figure and a percentage to the same act without saying which is the rent, which is the penalty, or what the 2% is levied on. ₹450 is in any case wrong as a single figure, because rent differs by locker size and by branch category.
Rewritten: 'Locker rent is debited once in six months, in advance, on 1 April and 1 October. If the rent is not received within 30 days of the debit date, a penal charge of 2% per month will be levied on the unpaid rent from the debit date until the date of payment. Part of a month counts as a full month.'
The trigger date, the base on which the percentage operates, and the rounding rule are now all on the page. That is what makes a clause enforceable rather than merely readable.
2. Replace the closing line 'The bank will not be responsible for any loss.' with wording that is fair to the customer and still protective of the bank, and explain why the replacement is stronger.
Read the worked answer
Replacement: 'The bank maintains the locker premises with due care. It is not liable for loss of or damage to the contents of a locker caused by events beyond its control, except where the loss results from the bank's own negligence. Locker holders are advised not to keep cash or high-value jewellery in the locker.'
Why this is stronger, not weaker. A blanket disclaimer is the clause a consumer forum is most likely to read as an unfair contract term: it promises nothing and disclaims everything, so it tends to be struck down rather than relied upon. The replacement does three jobs at once. It states the bank's positive duty (due care), which is the part a court will actually test. It confines the exclusion to what the bank genuinely cannot control. And it preserves liability for negligence, which is the only part of the exposure a bank cannot contract out of in practice anyway.
The advisory sentence about valuables matters because the notice and the standard locker agreement must not contradict each other; if the agreement says one thing and the circular another, the customer wins the argument.
Courtesy here is not decoration. A locker holder who feels the bank hid behind a clause is more likely to litigate or to shift his deposits than one who was told plainly what changed, from when, and why.
3. The notice must go out in Hindi and English. Name the two expressions in your rewritten text where a literal Hindi rendering would create a fresh ambiguity, and state how you would word them.
Read the worked answer
Spot 1 - 'debit'. The standard Hindi banking word is 'नामे', which clerks understand and a 68-year-old locker holder does not. Render the action, not the accounting term: 'आपके खाते से काटा जाएगा (debit)'. Keep the English word in brackets, because the customer's passbook will show the English.
Spot 2 - '2% per month on the unpaid rent until the date of payment'. A literal translation leaves open whether a part-month counts, and readers of the Hindi version are more likely to calculate in whole months. Write: 'बकाया किराए पर 2% प्रतिमाह; माह के एक भाग को भी पूरा माह माना जाएगा', and carry the same 30-day trigger across both versions.
A third check that is not about words. The two versions must not carry different figures or different dates. Bilingual notices are usually challenged on whichever version the customer actually read, so an error in the Hindi text is not cured by a correct English text. Fix the source sentence before translating; translating an already ambiguous sentence produces two ambiguous sentences and doubles the exposure.
The principle: translation is a second drafting exercise, not a photocopy.