'The farmer ploughs and his wife cooks': a textbook sentence, a girl's question and three periods to the exam
A Class 7 social science teacher in a farming block of Chhattisgarh has 40 students, 24 of them from cultivator households. The chapter on village economy says: 'The farmer ploughs the field and his wife prepares food at home.' During the lesson a girl whose family grows paddy asks, in front of the class, why the book says women do not work in the field when her mother and aunts transplant, weed and look after the cattle. The teacher has three periods before the half-yearly examination, whose question paper is set by the block and includes the item 'Describe the work of a farmer'. The textbook is the prescribed one and cannot be replaced, and a local speaker has recently said in a village meeting that women are not 'khetihar' but only helpers at home. The teacher wants to answer the girl without losing syllabus time or creating trouble with the community.
1. How should the teacher respond in the moment? Give the actual moves, in order, and justify each.
Read the worked answer
Move 1 - accept the question publicly. Say: 'That is a fair question about the book, not about you.' Thank the girl by name. Ignoring it, or saying 'we will discuss later', teaches 40 students that textbook statements are not to be examined and that this particular girl's knowledge of her own household does not count.
Move 2 - separate the book from the evidence, quickly. Draw two columns: 'what the book says' and 'what our households do'. In five minutes, students list farm tasks - ploughing, nursery raising, transplanting, weeding, harvesting, winnowing, cattle care, cooking, fetching water - and mark who does each in their own home. The tally will show women's work plainly without the teacher having to contradict the textbook on authority.
Move 3 - name the gap without a conspiracy story. Explain that the sentence describes some work and leaves other work out; a description can be incomplete without being a lie. That distinction is the actual skill being taught.
Move 4 - commit and keep the commitment. Fix the next class for ten minutes of this work; do not let it drift past the exam. Time cost is ten minutes of one period, not a lost syllabus.
2. Design the ten-minute activity that follows, so that 40 students practise reading a textbook critically without a field trip or extra materials.
Read the worked answer
Homework first (one night, no travel). Each student asks one woman in the household or neighbourhood three questions: which farm tasks did you do last season, in which months, and who decided the sowing. Answers are written as a list of tasks, not an essay, so that non-literate households can dictate and the child writes.
Class tally (five minutes). On the board, one row per task and a simple tally of how many households reported a woman doing it. Transplanting and weeding will usually dominate; ploughing will not. The class now has local evidence in numbers.
Critical reading (five minutes). Return to the textbook sentence. Ask three questions: which tasks in our tally appear in this sentence? whose work is missing? why might a book written for the whole country describe one pattern? Introduce the words generalisation and omission, and the idea that a source has an author and a purpose.
No confrontation with the community needed. The activity does not claim that women always plough; it documents the tasks the class has actually observed. This is defensible in any village meeting and it teaches source criticism, which is a syllabus skill, not an opinion.
3. How will you prepare students for the block-set item 'Describe the work of a farmer' while keeping the critique of the textbook alive?
Read the worked answer
Write a fuller answer, not a different one. Show the class a model answer that satisfies the exam item and is still true: it describes ploughing, sowing, irrigation and harvesting, and then adds a line on transplanting, weeding, cattle and post-harvest work, noting that these are often done by women and children. The examiner's requirement - accurate, organised description of farm work - is met more completely, so the student is not asked to choose between marks and honesty.
Teach the rubric explicitly. Content accuracy, coverage of the crop cycle, and use of terms. Coverage rewards the extra tasks; the student gains rather than risks.
Prepare for both wordings. Practise the item as set, and also a short writing task: 'Which work in farming is not counted as farming? Give one example from your area.' If it appears, they are ready; if not, nothing is lost.
Handle the community statement as a claim to examine, not a fight. Students can list which tasks need strength and which need skill, and see that the same argument would exclude most farm work. The teacher's position stays: we describe what we can observe and we cite it.