CHSE Odisha Elective Logic flashcards
CHSE Odisha Elective Logic · Build recall with a focused review session.
35 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Logic
- The normative science that studies the principles of correct inference, distinguishing valid from invalid reasoning by examining the relation between premises and conclusion rather than the content of statements.
- Validity
- A property of deductive arguments: it is impossible for all the premises to be true while the conclusion is false. Validity depends on form, not on the actual truth of the premises.
- Soundness
- An argument is sound when it is valid and all of its premises are actually true. Soundness guarantees a true conclusion, whereas validity alone does not.
- Inductive strength
- A graded property of inductive arguments: the premises make the conclusion probable. Strength increases with the amount and relevance of supporting evidence and decreases with counterevidence.
- Distribution
- A term is distributed when a proposition says something about every member of the class it denotes. Universal propositions distribute their subject; negative propositions distribute their predicate.
- Existential import
- The assumption that the subject class of a proposition has at least one member. Traditional logic assigns it to A and E propositions; modern Boolean logic does not.
- A proposition
- The universal affirmative categorical statement 'All S are P'. It distributes its subject only and, in traditional logic, asserts that the subject class is not empty.
- O proposition
- The particular negative categorical statement 'Some S are not P'. It distributes its predicate only and asserts that at least one member of S lies outside P.
- Obversion
- An immediate inference valid for all four categorical forms: change the quality of the proposition and replace the predicate term with its complement, leaving truth value unchanged.
- Conversion
- An immediate inference that swaps subject and predicate. It is valid for E and I propositions, valid per accidens for A when the subject exists, and invalid for O.
- Contradictory opposition
- The relation between A and O, and between E and I, on the square of opposition. Contradictories always differ in truth value: exactly one is true and the other false.
- Subalternation
- The square relation in which a universal implies its corresponding particular: A implies I and E implies O. It holds only when the subject class is not empty.
- Middle term
- The term occurring in both premises of a categorical syllogism and absent from the conclusion. It must be distributed in at least one premise for the syllogism to be valid.
- Figure of a syllogism
- The arrangement of the middle term in the premises. Four figures exist, distinguished by whether the middle term is subject or predicate in the major and minor premises.
- Mood of a syllogism
- The sequence of the three categorical proposition forms in a syllogism, given in the order major premise, minor premise, conclusion, using the letters A, E, I and O.
- Undistributed middle
- A formal fallacy in which the middle term of a categorical syllogism is not distributed in either premise, so the premises fail to link the subject and predicate classes.
- Illicit process
- A formal fallacy in which a term is distributed in the conclusion but not in the premise where it occurs. It appears as illicit major or illicit minor.
- Affirming the consequent
- A formal fallacy with the pattern P implies Q; Q; therefore P. The conditional does not license inferring the antecedent from the consequent, since other causes may produce Q.
- Ad hominem
- An informal fallacy that attacks the character, circumstances or motives of the person presenting an argument instead of addressing the argument's premises and reasoning.
- Begging the question
- The fallacy of petitio principii, in which the conclusion is assumed, explicitly or in disguised form, among the premises, making the argument circular rather than supportive.
- Hasty generalisation
- An informal fallacy that draws a general conclusion from a sample that is too small, unrepresentative or biased to support the claimed generalisation.
- Material conditional
- The truth function P implies Q, false only when P is true and Q is false. It is equivalent to not-P or Q and does not assert any causal connection.
- Tautology
- A well-formed formula that is true under every possible assignment of truth values to its sentence letters, such as P or not-P. Its truth-table column contains only T.
- Contradiction
- A well-formed formula that is false under every possible assignment of truth values, such as P and not-P. Its truth-table column contains only F.
- Logical equivalence
- Two statements are logically equivalent when they have identical truth values on every row of a joint truth table, so each entails the other.
- Modus ponens
- A rule of inference: from a conditional and its antecedent, infer the consequent. Formally, P implies Q together with P yields Q.
- Modus tollens
- A rule of inference: from a conditional and the negation of its consequent, infer the negation of its antecedent. Formally, P implies Q with not-Q yields not-P.
- Conditional proof
- A proof technique in which the antecedent of the desired conditional is assumed as an extra premise, the consequent is derived, and the assumption is then discharged to yield the conditional.
- Reductio ad absurdum
- An indirect proof technique: assume the negation of the conclusion, derive a formal contradiction, and conclude that the original conclusion follows from the premises.
- Argument from analogy
- An inductive argument: two things share several properties, one has a further property, so the other probably has it too. Strength depends on relevance and disanalogies.
- Mill's method of difference
- A causal method comparing two cases that differ in one circumstance: the circumstance present when the effect occurs and absent when it does not is the probable cause.
- Falsifiability
- Popper's criterion that a scientific hypothesis must forbid some observable outcome, so that a single contrary observation can refute it. Unfalsifiable claims are not empirical science.
- Operational definition
- A definition that specifies the concrete procedure or measurement used to identify or quantify a variable, allowing independent observers to record it consistently.
- Well-formed formula
- A symbolic expression built recursively from sentence letters using negation, conjunction, disjunction, conditional and biconditional, with parentheses fixing the scope of each connective.
- Main connective
- The connective in a well-formed formula that governs the whole expression and determines its form, its truth-table evaluation and the last step of its construction.