Private Car Used for Ride-Hailing: Own Damage and Third-Party Claim
Mr. Das of Bhubaneswar owns a 2019 diesel car registered as a private vehicle. The policy shows IDV ₹6.5 lakh, a compulsory deductible of ₹1,000 and a voluntary deductible of ₹2,000. There is no zero-depreciation add-on. In September the car met with an accident; the authorised workshop estimated repairs at ₹1,80,000. The insurer’s surveyor approved ₹1,50,000 as reasonable, applied depreciation of ₹25,000, and assessed salvage at ₹4,000. The accident also damaged a roadside shop; the shopkeeper claimed ₹40,000. The insurer’s investigation found that Mr. Das had been driving for a ride-hailing app for the past six months and had earned ₹18,000 in the previous month. The policy describes the vehicle as 'private car' and excludes use for hire or reward. Mr. Das says he did not know that this mattered.
1. Calculate the net own-damage claim payable, showing each deduction. State whether the third-party property damage of ₹40,000 is payable and by whom.
Read the worked answer
Own-damage calculation: surveyor’s approved repair cost ₹1,50,000; less depreciation ₹25,000 = ₹1,25,000; less salvage ₹4,000 = ₹1,21,000; less compulsory deductible ₹1,000 and voluntary deductible ₹2,000 = ₹1,18,000. So the net OD claim is ₹1,18,000, assuming no policy breach. The third-party property damage of ₹40,000 stands on a different footing. It is a statutory liability under the Motor Vehicles Act; the insurer is obliged to satisfy a third-party judgment/award even if the insured breached a policy condition, and can then recover from the insured. Practically, the insurer may settle the shopkeeper’s verified ₹40,000 and seek reimbursement from Mr. Das, or defend it if the amount is inflated. It is not reduced by depreciation or the OD deductible, but the insurer may recover it from the insured because of the hire-or-reward breach.
2. Discuss the effect of using a private car for ride-hailing on the policy. Can the insurer reject the own-damage claim entirely? Give reasons.
Read the worked answer
Using a private car for ride-hailing is a material change and a breach of the policy’s description and the 'hire or reward' exclusion. The insurer can reject the own-damage claim if it proves the vehicle was being used for hire at the time or that the use increased the risk and was not disclosed. The rejection must be based on the policy terms and evidence; the app records and ₹18,000 earning are strong evidence. However, rejection is not automatic for every claim: the insurer should show nexus between the breach and the loss, and act fairly. The third-party liability cannot be repudiated in the same way; the insurer must pay the third party and recover from Mr. Das. The insurer may also cancel the policy prospectively for non-disclosure and refuse renewal. Mr. Das’s 'I did not know' is not a strong defence because the proposal declares private use and the policy excludes hire.
3. What should Mr. Das have done differently, and what can he do now if he disputes the deduction or rejection?
Read the worked answer
He should have disclosed the ride-hailing use, taken a commercial vehicle policy (or a private policy with the correct add-on if the insurer permits), and added zero-depreciation and engine/consumables covers if he wanted full repair protection. He should also avoid a voluntary deductible if he wants a higher claim. Now he should: obtain the surveyor’s report and the insurer’s written repudiation/deduction note; check whether the ₹40,000 third-party claim is genuine; pay the third party if asked and keep receipts; make a written grievance to the insurer, then IGMS and the Insurance Ombudsman if the OD claim is wrongly rejected. If the insurer has recovered the third-party amount without justification, he can challenge that. He should not continue ride-hailing on the private policy, because a future claim will face the same problem.