DSSSB TGT study materials
DSSSB TGT study resources

Grace-Mark Decision After a Class Test

DSSSB TGT · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Grace-Mark Decision After a Class Test

A TGT has finished a 100-mark mathematics test for 40 students. The pass mark is 33. The raw mean is 58 and the median is 61. Eight students scored below 33: 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 32. The school's grace-mark policy allows at most 5 grace marks per student, only for a student within 5 marks of the pass mark, and no student may be raised above 100. After grace, the class mean must not exceed 60, and the pass rate must be at least 85%. A colleague suggests giving 9 marks to the student at 24 so that 'no one fails'. Another suggests distributing 80 grace marks to bring the mean to exactly 60. The principal wants a decision before the result meeting.

1. What is the minimum total grace needed to reach the 85% pass rate? Show the distribution and check every numeric constraint.

Read the worked answer

The class needs 34 passes because 85% of 40 is 34. Raw passes are 32, so two more students must reach 33. The cheapest way is to give 1 mark to each of the two students at 32. Total grace = 2. Check: both students are within 5 of the pass mark; neither exceeds 5 grace marks; no mark goes above 100; the pass rate becomes 34/40 = 85%; the new total is 58 × 40 + 2 = 2322, so the mean is 2322/40 = 58.05, which is below 60. This is minimal because at least 1 mark is needed for each of the two additional passes, so no total below 2 can work. The teacher should note that this minimal plan is not the same as the fairest plan: it gives grace to two students while leaving other eligible students unchanged.

2. Evaluate the proposal to give 9 marks to the student at 24 and the claim that no one should fail.

Read the worked answer

The proposal breaks two rules. First, the maximum is 5 grace marks per student, so 9 is not allowed. Second, grace is allowed only within 5 marks of the pass mark; a student at 24 is 9 below 33 and is outside the eligible group. Even the maximum 5 marks would take 24 to 29, still below 33. The student at 25 would reach 30, also below 33. So the claim that no one should fail cannot be met through grace under this policy. The honest options are to record the fails, provide targeted remediation, or use a properly designed re-test if the school permits it. Inflating marks would make the result look better but would not give a valid measure of the students' mathematics.

3. Can the 80-grace-mark proposal achieve a mean of 60 without breaking policy? Show the maximum permissible grace and the resulting mean.

Read the worked answer

No. Under the policy, grace is limited to students within 5 marks of 33. The eligible scores are 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 32: six students. At most 5 marks each, the maximum permissible grace is 6 × 5 = 30 marks. The new total would be 2320 + 30 = 2350, giving a mean of 2350/40 = 58.75, not 60. Reaching 60 would require a total of 2400, i.e. 80 grace marks, which is far beyond the permissible 30. Giving grace to passing students would also violate the 'within 5 marks' rule. The 80-mark proposal is therefore arithmetically impossible under policy, and the discussion should return to remediation or re-testing.