Conflict of Interest and Inducement: Surveyor's Cousin in Finance
An IRDAI-licensed surveyor and loss assessor, holding a fire and engineering licence, is appointed by an insurer to survey a fire loss of about Rs 3 crore at a textile mill. On reaching the site, he finds that the mill's finance manager, who handles insurance and claim papers, is his first cousin. The mill's director then offers him a 'professional fee' of Rs 1.5 lakh, separate from the insurer's fee, to coordinate and expedite the claim, saying this is normal practice. The surveyor has not yet signed the appointment letter. The insurer expects a preliminary report within seven days. The surveyor's licence is due for renewal in three months. The insurer is unaware of the relationship. The surveyor is unsure whether he can continue, whether he can accept the fee, and what he must disclose and to whom.
1. What should the surveyor do about the cousin relationship and the director's offer under the 2015 Regulations and code of conduct?
Read the worked answer
The surveyor must treat both facts as conflicts. A close relative in the insured's finance function, who handles the claim, can influence the survey and create an appearance of bias. The offer of a fee from the insured is a direct inducement.
Under the IRDAI (Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors) Regulations, 2015 and the code of conduct, a surveyor must be independent, impartial and free from conflict of interest; he must not accept any remuneration from the insured or any other party other than the insurer. He should immediately disclose the relationship and the offer in writing to the insurer, decline the fee and recuse himself from the assignment. He should not sign the appointment letter. If he has already done any inspection, he should submit a brief factual note and hand over documents. He must not use the 7-day deadline as a reason to continue.
2. What are the regulatory and professional consequences if he accepts the fee or continues without disclosure?
Read the worked answer
Accepting the fee would be a breach of the code of conduct and professional misconduct. It could lead to disciplinary action by IRDAI, including suspension or cancellation of the surveyor's licence, and may affect renewal. The insurer could reject the survey report and appoint another surveyor, delaying the claim.
The insured's payment could also be treated as an inducement to inflate the claim, exposing the surveyor to allegations of fraud or collusion. Continuing without disclosing the cousin relationship would breach the duty of independence even if the report was honest. The surveyor should also consider whether the relationship falls within the definition of conflict of interest in the regulations; if in doubt, disclose and withdraw.
3. What should he do about the pending appointment, timelines and documents?
Read the worked answer
He should inform the insurer's appointing officer immediately, preferably the same day, in writing, stating the relationship and the inducement offer. He should request that another licensed surveyor be appointed and offer to hand over any papers or site notes. He should not submit a report on the merits.
If the insurer asks him to continue, he should decline unless the conflict is removed and the insurer confirms in writing after full disclosure; even then, the safer course is withdrawal. He should maintain confidentiality of the insured's documents and not discuss the claim outside. The 30-day report timeline under the regulations does not override the conflict rule; the insurer can appoint a replacement within time. He should record the disclosure in his own file for regulatory inspection.