A Metaphor Misread in the Arabic-Language Poem
In a revision class on the prescribed poem «اللغة العربية تنعى حظها بين أهلها», a student analyses the opening line: «أنا البحرُ في أحشائهِ الدُّرُّ كامنٌ ... فهل سألوا الغوّاصَ عن صدفاتي». He writes: “This is تشبيه مرسل because the poet compares the Arabic language to the sea using أنا and البحر, and the غواص is the poet himself.” Another student says the line contains استعارة and that الغواص stands for scholars who can uncover the language’s treasures. The teacher has 8 minutes before the test and wants to settle the dispute without asking students to memorise labels. The class knows the difference between تشبيه and استعارة, and has discussed personification. The exam question is worth 5 marks: 2 for the device, 2 for the explanation, and 1 for the figurative role of الغواص.
1. Decide whether «أنا البحر» is best described as تشبيه or استعارة, and justify using the wording of the line.
Read the worked answer
It is better described as استعارة, specifically استعارة تصريحية in context. The speaker - the Arabic language personified - says «أنا البحر», not «أنا كالبحر» or «أنا مثل البحر». A تشبيه needs an explicit comparison particle or a clear comparative structure; here the identification is direct: the language is the sea. The word «البحر» is the مستعار منه, and the speaker is the مستعار له.
The student’s phrase “compares the language to the sea using أنا and البحر” describes the effect of a comparison, but not the rhetorical form. If the line had said «أنا كالبحر», the label تشبيه would be defensible. The absence of «كـ» or «مثل» is the deciding textual clue, not a memorised definition.
2. Explain the role of «الغوّاص» and whether the second student’s reading is defensible.
Read the worked answer
«الغوّاص» is the diver who descends into the sea to bring up pearls. In the extended metaphor, the sea is the Arabic language, the pearls are its hidden treasures of meaning and expression, and the shells («صدفاتي») are the outward forms that contain those treasures. The diver is therefore not literally the poet; he represents the skilled reader, scholar, or critic who dives beneath the surface to extract meaning.
The second student’s reading is defensible because it follows the logic of the metaphor rather than replacing it with a label. The rhetorical question «فهل سألوا الغوّاصَ عن صدفاتي» reproaches those who judge the language without consulting those who know it deeply. The first student’s identification of the غواص as “the poet himself” is too narrow: the poet speaks in the voice of the language, and the diver is a figure for the interpreter, not a self-portrait.
3. Rewrite the student’s 5-mark answer as a tight exam response, keeping the device, the explanation, and the role of الغواص.
Read the worked answer
Model exam response: The line is built on استعارة تصريحية: the Arabic language speaks as «أنا البحر», identifying itself directly with the sea without a comparison particle. The sea contains hidden pearls, which stand for the language’s treasures of meaning and expression; the shells are the outward forms that hold them. «الغوّاص» is the diver who brings up those pearls, figuratively the scholar or critic who understands the language deeply. The rhetorical question rebukes those who judge Arabic without asking its experts. This reading earns the device mark because it names the استعارة, the explanation mark because it links the sea, pearls, and shells, and the غواص mark because it identifies the figurative interpreter rather than the poet literally.