Fourteen Hours a Day
Arjun is 17 and in Plus Two Science at a government higher secondary school in Kollam. He wants a medical seat and has been studying about 14 hours a day for eight months, sleeping four to five hours. In the last six weeks he has had frequent headaches, loss of appetite, and has stopped playing football, which he used to love. His mock-test rank fell from 40 to 210 in a batch of 900. He now says, 'If I don't get a rank, my life is over,' and rereads the same page for hours. His father was laid off last year, and his mother has started saying he is 'lazy and ungrateful'. His class teacher notices that he is irritable and has stopped talking to friends. He has no prior history of psychiatric treatment and denies alcohol or drug use. A teacher refers him to you, a school psychology trainee.
1. Use Lazarus's cognitive appraisal model to explain why a fall in mock-test rank is producing this level of distress in Arjun.
Read the worked answer
In Lazarus's model, stress is not produced directly by an event; it is produced by the person's appraisal of the event and of their capacity to cope with it.
Primary appraisal answers 'Is this relevant to my well-being, and how?' Arjun does not appraise the rank fall as irrelevant or benign. He appraises it as a threat - a future harm that has not yet occurred but seems likely - and possibly as a harm-loss, since eight months of effort appears to have been wasted. Crucially, the threat is not the rank itself but the meaning attached to it: 'my life is over'. That appraisal links the rank to his entire worth and future.
Secondary appraisal answers 'What can I do about it?' Here his resources look thin: four to five hours of sleep, no football, an unemployed father, a mother who calls him lazy, and a study method that is not working (rereading the same page). He concludes that his coping resources are insufficient, which converts a challenge into a threat.
This explains why the same rank fall might be a manageable challenge for another student. It also predicts that advice to 'just work harder' will fail, because it targets the event rather than the appraisal. The target for intervention is the catastrophic meaning ('rank = life') and the depleted secondary appraisal (sleep, support, study method).
2. Distinguish problem-focused from emotion-focused coping and propose two specific strategies for Arjun, justifying why each is needed rather than either one alone.
Read the worked answer
Problem-focused coping acts on the source of stress: it changes the demand, removes it, or builds resources to meet it. Emotion-focused coping acts on the emotional response: it changes the appraisal or the felt distress without necessarily changing the situation.
Problem-focused strategies for Arjun:
- Replace 14 hours of low-yield rereading with structured 90-minute study blocks and active recall, and analyse the 170-rank fall error-by-error with a teacher. This addresses the actual academic problem rather than his feeling about it.
- Restore sleep to about seven hours and reinstate some physical activity. Sleep deprivation impairs consolidation and attention, so it is part of the problem, not a luxury.
Emotion-focused strategies:
- Cognitive reappraisal of the belief 'if I don't get a rank, my life is over' - examining alternative paths into health careers and the evidence for and against the belief.
- Brief arousal-reduction techniques and deliberate contact with a supportive friend or relative, to lower the physiological and emotional load enough to study.
Why both: Relaxation alone would leave the inefficient study pattern and sleep debt untouched, so the stressor would keep regenerating. Study restructuring alone would leave the catastrophic appraisal intact, so any future rank fluctuation would recreate the crisis. The two together match the two appraisals identified above.
3. Is Arjun best described as experiencing stress or burnout? What further information would you need before deciding, and why does the distinction matter for what you recommend?
Read the worked answer
Burnout is usually described in three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation or cynicism (a detached, negative attitude toward the work or the people involved), and reduced personal accomplishment. It typically develops from chronic demands, often in a role where the person feels they have little control.
Arjun clearly shows exhaustion (headaches, appetite loss, irritability, four to five hours of sleep) and reduced accomplishment ('rereading the same page', rank fall). What is not yet established is cynicism - he has not said he no longer cares about medicine; if anything, he cares too much. His withdrawal from friends could be exhaustion, shame, or incipient depression rather than depersonalisation. The eight-month duration fits a chronic stress picture, but burnout is usually tied to a role or occupation, and his role is that of a student preparing for an entrance examination.
Information needed: Does he feel detached or indifferent toward studying, or does he still value it? Does he feel any sense of accomplishment in anything? Do the symptoms persist outside the examination context? Are there symptoms of depression - persistent low mood, anhedonia, worthlessness, suicidal ideation - that would require a different response?
Why it matters: If this is primarily stress with a catastrophic appraisal, the priorities are reappraisal, sleep, study restructuring and family work. If it is burnout, restoring control and reducing chronic load become central. If there is a depressive episode, the school trainee should not treat it alone and should refer. The label changes the intervention, so the missing information is not academic - it is clinically decisive.