Labelling a fragment: Sāṃkhya, Cārvāka, or Vedānta?
At a manuscript library in Thrissur, a Plus Two student is preparing a museum label for a palm-leaf fragment. The fragment contains the lines: 'pradhānaṃ triguṇaṃ sūte puruṣā bahavaḥ smṛtāḥ / na īśvaraḥ kāraṇaṃ tasya ...' The student proposes the label 'Cārvāka' because the fragment denies īśvara, and 'Vedānta' because a footnote uses the word ātman. The curator needs one school label and two technical reasons before the case goes on display. A senior scholar warns that isolated terms can migrate between schools, and that the plural puruṣāḥ is more diagnostic than the denial of īśvara. The student has the fragment, a Malayalam glossary, and twenty minutes; no other folios are available. The label must be defensible to a visitor who knows the six darśanas but not this manuscript.
1. Choose the best school label and give two textual reasons.
Read the worked answer
The best label is Sāṃkhya. First, 'pradhānaṃ triguṇaṃ' identifies pradhāna/prakṛti as constituted by the three guṇas, which is a Sāṃkhya doctrine. Second, 'puruṣā bahavaḥ' states that there are many puruṣas, another Sāṃkhya tenet; Advaita Vedānta would speak of one ātman, not a plurality of puruṣas. The denial of īśvara as kāraṇa is compatible with Sāṃkhya's atheistic realism, but it is not by itself decisive. The two positive features-triguṇa pradhāna and plural puruṣas-are stronger than the negative feature, so the label should rest on them.
2. Why is 'na īśvaraḥ' insufficient for Cārvāka, and what would you look for instead?
Read the worked answer
Many schools deny a creator īśvara: Sāṃkhya, Mīmāṃsā, Jainas, and Buddhists all do in different ways. Cārvāka requires a more specific set of doctrines: perception as the only pramāṇa, denial of rebirth and karma, and material elements as the ultimate realities. The fragment's 'pradhānaṃ triguṇam' and 'puruṣā bahavaḥ' point away from Cārvāka, which would not accept a triguṇa pradhāna or multiple puruṣas. To identify Cārvāka, look for rejection of inference as pramāṇa, denial of the afterlife, and a materialist account of consciousness. A single 'na īśvaraḥ' is too broad.
3. How should the label change if the glossary shows pradhāna used as a synonym of māyā?
Read the worked answer
If pradhāna is glossed as māyā and puruṣa as a single ātman, the fragment may be Vedāntic with Sāṃkhya vocabulary, not Sāṃkhya. The label should then be something like 'Vedānta (with Sāṃkhya terminology)' or 'Vedāntic commentary', and the catalogue note should explain that the terms are being reused. The plural puruṣāḥ would then need special explanation, since it conflicts with strict Advaita. The lesson is that a school label must follow the doctrinal function of terms in context, not the lexicon alone; the glossary can overturn a provisional label.