Best Content in the Batch: Marking a Formal Letter With a Broken Register
The Class 12 terminal examination carries a ten-mark letter: write to the Municipal Commissioner about stagnant drainage water in your locality. The marking scheme splits the marks as format 2, content 4, register and language 3, mechanics 1. One script has excellent content - three specific complaints, a date, a suggested remedy, a request for inspection within a week - but opens with 'Dear Sir' and no sender's address, closes with 'Yours friend', addresses the Commissioner as nīvu twice, and mixes in eight English words for which Telugu equivalents exist. Examiner A gives 4, saying the format and register are failures. Examiner B gives 7, saying the content is the best in the batch and marks should reward ideas. Both are marking the same 40 scripts, and the school's result depends on consistency. The head of department must fix a mark for this script, issue a ruling that binds both examiners, and decide whether format errors should be capped or merely deducted, since the board's scheme does not say.
1. Fix the mark using the stated split and show the arithmetic behind it.
Read the worked answer
Award 6/10.
| Criterion | Max | Awarded | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Format | 2 | 0.5 | No sender's address; 'Dear Sir' instead of the prescribed salutation; 'Yours friend' is a register error in the subscription |
| Content | 4 | 3.5 | Three specific complaints, a date, a remedy, a deadline for inspection - docked for no ward or reference detail |
| Register and language | 3 | 1.5 | nīvu to a Commissioner twice is the serious fault; eight avoidable English loans; sentence structure otherwise sound |
| Mechanics | 1 | 1 | Spelling and punctuation clean |
The decisive reasoning: the paper sets a letter, so register is part of what is being tested, not decoration. Examiner B's 'best content in the batch' is a comparison with other scripts, not a mark on this scale. Examiner A's 4 double-penalises content that is genuinely strong. 6 is where the two real errors bite and no further.
2. Both examiners must apply the same rule to the other 39 scripts. Should format errors be capped or deducted, and what exactly is the ruling?
Read the worked answer
Ruling: one error, one deduction.
- Slips - missing sender's address, wrong subscription, an English loan where a Telugu word exists - are deducted inside the 2-mark format band and the 3-mark register band only. They may not reduce content marks, because the content was supplied.
- Structural failure - no salutation and no subscription, a letter addressed to the wrong functionary, or no identifiable request - is capped at 5/10 regardless of content.
Why not a flat cap on all format errors? Because a cap turns a 2-mark criterion into a 6-mark penalty and manufactures exactly the 4-versus-7 spread under dispute. Why not pure deduction? Because a letter that reads like a paragraph of complaint has not done the task the paper set.
Apply the ruling to all 40 scripts before either examiner continues, and have both initial the same written rule, so the school's result is defensible on appeal.
3. Design the 15-minute re-teach and name the three fixes for this student.
Read the worked answer
Board layout, 5 minutes: sender's address → date → receiver's designation and address → subject line → salutation (Mahodayā / Mahodaya, not 'Dear Sir') → three paragraphs (problem, evidence, request) → subscription → signature and name.
Register, 5 minutes: the mīru/nīvu decision. To any official: mīru, garu, passive or third-person respect forms; never nīvu. Rewrite one sentence both ways aloud so the difference is audible, not just labelled.
Loanwords, 5 minutes: the eight English words from this script beside their Telugu equivalents; keep proper nouns such as the Commissioner's office as they are.
Three fixes for this student: (1) mīru throughout; (2) sender's address and a correct subscription; (3) a subject line naming the ward and the drainage problem. The content needs no work - say so, so the student knows exactly which half of the letter was good.