The Drawing Book and the Marksheet
Rohan Deshmukh is 15 and in Class 10 at a municipal school in Nashik. His pre-board total is 78%, but the subject-wise marks tell a different story: Mathematics 44/100 and Science 58/100, against 88 in Marathi and 82 in Social Science. For two years he has spent about two hours a day sketching and making digital posters; he designed the banner and invitation cards for his locality's Ganesh mandal and runs an art page with roughly 4,000 followers. His father, a workshop supervisor, has already told relatives that Rohan will take Science and become an engineer. Rohan says, 'I like drawing, but artists don't earn,' and has never spoken to a working designer, visited a design institute, or taken any aptitude or interest inventory. He also believes his 44 in Mathematics proves he 'cannot do anything technical'. His class teacher has suggested Commerce with art kept as a hobby. Nobody in the family has asked Rohan what he actually wants from work.
1. Identify the specific gaps in Rohan's self-awareness and explain, with reasons, two activities that would close them.
Read the worked answer
Rohan has data about marks, not about himself. Three gaps stand out.
1. Aptitude is being inferred from a single subject. A 44 in Mathematics measures performance in one Class 10 syllabus, not spatial or mechanical reasoning. If he wants evidence on 'technical', he needs a different instrument: a standardised aptitude battery interpreted by a counsellor, plus a practical task such as redrawing the mandal banner to a fixed size and explaining the measurements.
2. Interests and values are unexamined. He has never asked what he wants from work - income, creative control, autonomy, recognition, security. A values card-sort (pick five of fifteen, rank them) makes the trade-off visible, because engineering and design differ most sharply on autonomy and creative control, not on difficulty.
3. Reality of the occupation is missing. Two years of daily drawing is stronger evidence than any score. A RIASEC/Holland-type interest inventory, administered and interpreted properly, would show whether his pattern is Artistic or Realistic-Artistic - a combination relevant to industrial design and product styling, not only to fine art.
Add structured feedback from the art teacher, the mandal organiser and his father on what he demonstrably does well.
2. Rohan says 'artists don't earn'. Evaluate this as a basis for choosing a stream.
Read the worked answer
It is a belief, not a finding, and it commits a category error. 'Artist' lumps together fine-art painters, illustrators, graphic designers, UI/UX designers, animators, packaging designers and in-house brand designers - groups with very different income distributions.
The belief is partly true for self-employed fine artists, whose income is variable and often low at entry, and largely false for salaried commercial design, where entry pay in Maharashtra metro firms is a regular monthly figure and experienced UX designers earn substantially more.
What makes it a bad basis for a decision is not that it is wrong, but that it is unverified and untestable as stated. Testing it requires three cheap actions: (a) read occupational descriptions and job-role pages on the National Career Service or NSDC/Skill India portals to see actual tasks and entry requirements; (b) speak to two working designers - one salaried, one freelance - and ask about first-year earnings, how work arrives, and what kills income; (c) separate the average from the distribution, since design income is skewed and 'average' hides both the Rs 12,000 stencil-shop end and the Rs 80,000 product-design end.
Until he does this, the statement should be recorded as a hypothesis with a named source he intends to check, not as a reason to drop the option.
3. Design a two-week plan that reduces Rohan's confusion without forcing a premature stream decision.
Read the worked answer
The aim is to convert beliefs into evidence in fourteen days, at zero cost.
Days 1-3 - self-data. Score a RIASEC interest inventory and a values card-sort; write one page: 'three things I do voluntarily, three things I avoid.' Note that he already has two years of voluntary, unsupervised design work - that is the strongest self-awareness evidence he owns.
Days 4-7 - world-of-work data. Two informational interviews: one salaried graphic designer (an ad agency or printing firm in Nashik), one self-employed designer. Ask fixed questions: first-year income, what the work day looks like, what qualification employers asked for, what they wish they had studied. Follow with a visit to a design institute's open day or its admission page.
Days 8-10 - structural data. Meet the school counsellor with his marksheet and ask specifically: which streams keep B.Des/design entrance exams and a Commerce degree both open? Commerce with Mathematics, or Science with a design entrance exam taken alongside, are real options.
Days 11-14 - a reversible decision. Write a one-page comparison of two routes with cost, subjects, entrance exams and the first job each leads to; present it to his father as data, not defiance.
The decision should stay reversible: a stream choice at 15 does not close design, but ignoring Mathematics in Class 11 does close several design and engineering entrances.