04:45 on the approach lane to Ram Ghat: rumour, slope and a closed side lane
It is a Shahi Snan day at the Simhastha fair in Ujjain. By 04:30 about 2.5 lakh pilgrims are moving towards the ghats of the Shipra. You are a constable holding a 30-metre stretch of the approach lane to Ram Ghat, about 400 metres from Mahakaleshwar. The lane is 6 metres wide, slopes downhill towards the river, has a barricaded median, and one side lane that is closed because of repair work. At 04:45 the crowd at the far end stops moving while pilgrims keep arriving from the bus stand behind you. A rumour spreads that a sadhu has been crushed. Two men begin shouting and pushing near the median. You have a whistle and a public address loudspeaker on a pole 15 metres away; the nearest inspector is about 200 metres uphill.
1. What is your first action, and why is it that and not something else?
Read the worked answer
First action: stop the inflow from behind you and give the crowd an instruction with a specific content, using the whistle and then the PA system.
Reasoning: crowd deaths on a slope are caused by pressure from behind compressing people at a stationary front, not by the rumour itself. Every extra minute of inflow adds pressure to a queue that has already stopped, so halting arrivals at your stretch is the one lever you actually hold. The rumour then has to be answered with information, not denial - announcement should say plainly that the front has started moving again, or that the blockage is at a named point and pilgrims should use the announced alternative, so people can picture where they are and stop pushing. Loud, repeated, named instructions also drown out the two shouters and give the crowd a single voice to follow. Simultaneously send a runner to the inspector with the position, the stoppage time and the crowd estimate, because the next decision - opening or closing the lane - is not yours alone.
2. The closed side lane could be opened by removing three barricades. Do you open it? Set out the criteria for the decision.
Read the worked answer
Opening it is not automatically right - an open lane downhill can become a second funnel straight into the ghat, and a repair site gives people something to trip on. The decision must rest on four tests:
- Does it relieve pressure or merely relocate it? It helps only if the lane leads away from the ghat, giving a genuine exit, and if the exit is wide enough to take the flow at the current density. If it also ends at the river, it doubles the inflow and makes things worse.
- Can the crowd at the front be turned? With one constable and no radio, the barricades will come down faster than the information will travel; people at the front will simply pour in.
- Direction control. If opened, it must be one-way and marshalled at both ends, otherwise two streams meet inside a narrow lane and create the very compression you are trying to relieve.
- Slope and surface. Loose material and a downhill gradient cause falls, and a fallen pilgrim in a moving crowd is how fatalities begin.
My call: keep it closed for now, station a constable and two volunteers at the barricades to prevent a breach, and put the proposal to the inspector with the lane's destination and width stated. The paperwork comes later - but record the time, the rumour, what you announced and what you did.
3. After the crowd clears, what do you record and report, and why does it matter beyond paperwork?
Read the worked answer
Record, in time order: the moment the front stopped; your estimate of density and numbers; the exact wording and timing of the PA announcement; the barricade position; who you sent to the inspector and when; the names of volunteers and any injured person with the hospital they were sent to; and the point at which movement resumed. Add the rumour's origin as far as it can be traced, and the names of the two men who pushed, if witnesses identify them.
Why it matters: a stampede inquiry works from times, not impressions, and an official who can produce a timed log of decisions is judged differently from one who says he 'managed the crowd'. The log also shows the rumour was answered with a named fact rather than a denial - which is the difference between calming a crowd and being believed to be hiding something. Culturally, this fair is tied to the Shipra and to Mahakaleshwar, so announcements should use the local names pilgrims recognise; generic directions in a crowd of outsiders are useless. A brief note on what worked also helps the next Shahi Snan.