Flood Release on the Tawa: Who Do You Move First?
During the second week of August the Tawa reservoir, in Narmadapuram district, releases 42,000 cusecs after heavy rain in its catchment. Sub-Inspector Rathore, posted eleven kilometres downstream, has four habitations on his flood list. Sarni Tola lies half a kilometre from the river on ground four metres above the normal bed and has 380 residents. Bakayan is two kilometres away but stands on a nine-metre bank; its 210 residents have a brick school that can serve as a shelter. Nayagaon is six kilometres away on the opposite bank, reached by a causeway that goes under at five metres. Ratanpur lies 1.2 kilometres from the river on ground three metres above the bed and has 640 residents, half of them children; its only metalled exit road crosses the Nayagaon causeway. The district control room wants a priority list within the hour; the first flood wave is expected in about four hours.
1. Rank the four habitations for evacuation and justify the order.
Read the worked answer
Order: Ratanpur, Sarni Tola, Bakayan, Nayagaon (monitor only).
- Ratanpur first. It has the lowest bank above the bed among the exposed villages (3 m), the largest population (640), half of them children who cannot self-evacuate, and, decisively, a single exit that crosses the Nayagaon causeway. If the causeway submerges first, Ratanpur is cut off while its houses are still dry - the classic trap of evacuating too late.
- Sarni Tola second. Closest to the river (0.5 km) and only 4 m above the bed, so less warning time, but a smaller and more mobile population.
- Bakayan third. Two kilometres away is irrelevant; its nine-metre bank is the highest ground in the list, and the school gives an on-site shelter option. Move only its most vulnerable households.
- Nayagaon last. No flood exposure is stated for the village itself; the real problem is the causeway, which is a route risk, not a habitation risk.
The governing principle is exposure, not distance: a near village on high ground is safer than a far one on low ground with one exit.
2. What does the causeway fact change about timing and resources, and what should the SI request now rather than later?
Read the worked answer
It converts a flood problem into a route-cut problem with a deadline. The wave is about four hours out; the causeway submerges at a five-metre rise. From the moment it goes under, Ratanpur can only be reached by boat or from the far side, which removes any vehicle-based evacuation.
Consequences:
- Ratanpur must be cleared before the causeway is threatened, not when water reaches the houses; the SI should set an internal deadline well inside the four hours and start with children, the elderly and the sick.
- Close and physically cordon the causeway to two-way traffic so that it does not clog with private vehicles, and keep one lane for evacuation only.
- Pre-position now: SDRF/NDRF boats and divers on the Ratanpur side, a list of able-bodied volunteers per hamlet, and battery megaphones, because mobile networks often fail in such weather.
- Ask the dam authorities for the release figures every hour; a revised release upward changes the deadline and the order.
3. The panchayat asks the SI to decide whether evacuation should be compulsory. Which authority decides, and what is the SI's lawful role?
Read the worked answer
Under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the district-level authority is the District Disaster Management Authority, chaired by the Collector, who is also the district's incident commander for flood response. The Superintendent of Police controls the police deployment. A sub-inspector does not have the legal power to order a general evacuation of a village; that decision, and any coercive enforcement of it, comes from the district administration.
The SI's lawful and useful role is to:
- report ground facts upward (levels, causeway state, numbers, road conditions) so the Collector can decide with real data;
- issue warnings and persuasion through the patwari, sarpanch, and public-address systems;
- cordon routes, prevent looting, keep the causeway clear, and register any missing-person reports;
- assist, not command, the SDRF, and record the time of every warning issued, because that log protects both the villagers and the administration.
If a person refuses to leave despite warning, the SI records the refusal in writing with witnesses and informs the SDM; police persuasion is lawful, forced removal without administrative authority is not.