The Cash Election Ad on Cable
City Cable, a local cable TV operator in Jalandhar with 12,000 subscribers, is offered ₹80,000 in cash by a candidate's campaign manager. The deal: a 30-second advertisement, 20 airings a day for 10 days, on the operator's two local channels. The ad says the rival candidate 'took a 20% commission on every road contract' and shows a man in a doctor's coat saying the candidate 'cured my diabetes through his health camp'. No pre-certification certificate is attached. The election notification is out and the model code of conduct is in force. The operator's brother is the candidate's campaign treasurer. The operator needs the money because a fibre upgrade is due. The ad is delivered on a pen drive at 9 p.m.; the campaign wants it on air by 7 a.m.
1. Identify the compliance failures in the proposed broadcast.
Read the worked answer
Several failures are visible before the content is even judged. A political advertisement on cable TV needs pre-certification from the MCMC; no certificate is attached, so airing it would breach the condition. The model code of conduct is in force, and cash payment for political advertising invites paid-news and expenditure violations. The '20% commission' line is an unproven criminal allegation against a rival; the operator could be sued for defamation and could face a broadcast-content complaint. The 'doctor' making a diabetes cure claim is a medical claim that cannot be broadcast without substantiation, and a white coat does not make it true. The operator's brother as campaign treasurer is a direct conflict of interest. The 20-airings-a-day schedule is not itself illegal, but it magnifies every problem. The manager's fibre-upgrade need is real but does not convert an uncertified, defamatory ad into a lawful one.
2. What should the operator do before 7 a.m.? Give a decision tree.
Read the worked answer
Before 7 a.m.: do not air. Ask the campaign manager for the MCMC certificate and the script that was certified; check that the certificate matches the pen-drive copy. If there is no certificate, return the material and the cash, or refuse the cash and issue a written rejection; do not bank cash without an invoice. If a certificate exists but the ad still contains the commission allegation or the cure claim, seek written legal advice and, in the meantime, do not air. Tell the campaign the reason in writing. Log the time of delivery, the request, the missing certificate and the decision. Offer to air a certified, cleaned ad if it arrives in time. The operator should also disclose the family link to staff and, if any ad is aired, keep the brother out of the decision and the billing.
3. How does the operator's family link affect the decision, and what records should be kept?
Read the worked answer
The family link creates a bias risk and a public perception risk. The operator should hand the decision to another senior staff member and record that recusal. If the ad is lawful and aired, disclose the relationship to viewers in a neutral line and keep the billing at arm's length. Records to keep: the ad copy, the MCMC certificate, the campaign's written request, the payment invoice or rejection note, the air log with times and dates, and the conflict-of-interest note. If the operator airs the ad without these records, the election authorities can treat the cash as an undeclared political expenditure and the operator as a participant. The fibre upgrade can be financed by a bank loan; a broadcast licence cannot be repaired as easily.