RBSE Sec Voc Food Processing study materials
RBSE Sec Voc Food Processing study resources

Under-pasteurised milk after a flow rate increase and a home-cut gasket

RBSE Sec Voc Food Processing · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Under-pasteurised milk after a flow rate increase and a home-cut gasket

A cooperative dairy in Alwar runs a plate pasteuriser rated at 1,000 L/h with a holding tube of 4.2 L, a flow diversion valve set at 72 °C and a chart temperature recorder. To meet a new school milk order, the manager raises the pump stroke so the plant runs at 1,400 L/h and replaces a leaking regenerator gasket with a locally cut rubber sheet. The recorder chart for that day shows the pen sticking at 74 °C for two hours. The milk is filled into pouches, held in a cold room at 6 °C and delivered the next morning. The plant's phosphatase test on a sample from the first hour is negative, so the manager concludes the milk was properly pasteurised. Two days later two schools report sour milk with a high coliform count, and the dairy's retained sample shows a plate count of 4 × 10⁵ CFU/mL.

1. Calculate the actual holding time at 1,400 L/h and decide whether the milk was properly pasteurised. Explain why the negative phosphatase test did not prove safety.

Read the worked answer

Holding time: 1,400 L/h = 1,400 / 3,600 = 0.3889 L/s. Holding time = volume / flow = 4.2 / 0.3889 = 10.8 seconds.

At the rated 1,000 L/h: 0.2778 L/s, so 4.2 / 0.2778 = 15.1 s - just meeting the 72 °C/15 s requirement.

Decision: 10.8 s at 72 °C is well short of the legal minimum of 15 s. The milk was not legally pasteurised; it was only heat-treated, whatever the recorder showed.

Why the phosphatase test alone is not proof:

  • Alkaline phosphatase is more heat-labile than the pathogens of concern, so a negative result is a necessary but not a sufficient check - it can be negative even where flow or temperature control has drifted.
  • The sample came from the first hour, not from the whole two-hour run, and the sticking recorder pen means the temperature record itself is unreliable; the process must be judged on validated flow, hold time and a working FDV.
  • The gasket and the 6 °C cold room allow post-pasteurisation contamination, which phosphatase cannot detect at all; coliforms at high count point strongly to post-process contamination.
  • A plate count of 4 × 10⁵ CFU/mL is far beyond the limit for pasteurised milk in the FSSAI microbiological standards, so the product is non-compliant on its own evidence.

2. Identify the equipment and hygiene failures in this incident and specify the corrective actions, with numbers.

Read the worked answer

Failures and corrections:

  1. Flow/hold time. Required hold volume at 1,400 L/h for 15 s = 0.3889 × 15 = 5.83 L. Either restrict the pump to 1,000 L/h (giving 15.1 s) or fit a holding tube of at least 6 L; fit a mechanical flow-control or a flow transmitter interlocked with the FDV so that flow above set point diverts the product.
  2. Temperature control. Recalibrate the recorder, replace the sticking pen, check chart speed, and verify the FDV opens within 1 s if temperature falls below 72 °C. Use a calibrated mercury-in-glass thermometer and an independent recorder.
  3. Gasket. A locally cut rubber sheet has the wrong profile, no food-contact approval and cannot seal under pressure. Replace with a food-grade EPDM/silicone gasket of the correct profile from the plate manufacturer. Check pressure differential: pasteurised-side pressure must exceed raw-side pressure by about 0.5–1 bar in the regenerator, otherwise raw milk leaks into pasteurised milk.
  4. Hygiene and storage. Verify CIP (alkali 1–2% at 75–80 °C for about 20 minutes, rinse, acid, sanitise) with ATP swabs and rinse-water tests. Cold room at 6 °C is too warm for stored pasteurised milk - set it at 4 °C or below and monitor it with a data logger.
  5. Records. Create a pasteuriser log per run: flow, inlet/outlet temperature, holding time, diversion events, CIP record and operator signature.

3. Draft a verification plan before the dairy is allowed to supply schools again: what you would test, where the samples come from, and what you would require before release.

Read the worked answer

Before restart (engineering verification):

  • Hold-tube test by the dye or conductivity method at 1,000 and 1,400 L/h to confirm actual residence time.
  • FDV test: force the temperature below 72 °C and confirm diversion within 1 s and that no diverted milk reaches the filler.
  • Recorder calibration certificate and a 24-hour chart run.
  • Pressure differential check across the regenerator in both directions; gasket inspection and replacement record.
  • CIP validation: ATP swabs on plates, gaskets and filler heads, plus a rinse-water count.

Product testing (raw, pasteurised, and finished pack):

  • Alkaline phosphatase on pasteurised milk, every run, with the result written on the pasteuriser log.
  • Total plate count and coliform count on pasteurised milk, and on the finished pouch after cold storage, against the FSSAI microbiological standards for pasteurised milk (coliforms must be absent).
  • Methylene blue reduction or a similar keeping-quality test on the finished product; storage trial at 7 °C for the declared shelf life.
  • Swabs from the filler and the cold room.

Release criteria: every parameter within the current FSSAI standard; a signed pasteuriser log with no diversion events and a valid chart; three consecutive compliant production days before schools are resupplied.

Also: withdraw and recall all pouches from the affected run, inform the schools and the food safety authority as required, re-train operators, and re-audit the plant before resuming supply.