Editing a Lok Adalat Notice for Clarity and Grammar
The High Court’s Legal Services Committee has drafted a public notice for a Lok Adalat. The draft reads: 'All the parties who are interested in settling their disputes are hereby informed that a Lok Adalat will be held on 15th June, 2025 in the premises of the High Court. The parties are requested to bring all relevant documents with them. No adjournment will be granted on the ground of absence of counsel. The applicants whom have already filed their case may appear before the Legal Services Authority. For further details, contact the undersigned.' The committee chair finds the notice vague and grammatically uneven. It omits the time, the court hall, the case-number requirement, and a named contact. It also uses 'parties' and 'applicants' as if they were interchangeable. The notice must be short enough for a notice board, formal in tone, and precise enough that a party who has never appeared in court can act on it.
1. Identify at least four specific problems in the draft (grammar, ambiguity, missing information) and give the correction for each.
Read the worked answer
Wordiness:
All the parties who are interestedcan be reduced toAll parties interested. The meaning does not change, and the notice becomes easier to read.Ambiguous pronoun:
with themhas no clear antecedent. It could mean the parties should bring other people, or that the parties should bring documents. Replace it withwith all relevant documents.Case error:
The applicants whom have already filed their caseuses the object formwhomas the subject ofhave. Correct it towho have. Also changetheir casetotheir casesto match the pluralapplicantsif the plural is kept.Inconsistent date style:
15th June, 2025should be15 June 2025in formal Indian legal notice writing.Missing particulars: the draft does not state the time, the court hall, the case-number requirement, or a named contact. These are not stylistic points; without them a first-time litigant cannot comply.
Vague signatory:
the undersigneddepends on a signature block that may not survive photocopying. Name the post, for exampleAssistant Registrar (Legal Services).
2. Rewrite the notice in 60 to 80 words, keeping a formal tone and adding the missing particulars.
Read the worked answer
Notice: A Lok Adalat will be held on 15 June 2025 at 10:30 a.m. in Court Hall III, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. All parties interested in settling their disputes must appear with all relevant documents. Parties whose cases are already before the Telangana State Legal Services Authority should bring their case numbers. No adjournment will be granted solely because counsel is absent. For details, contact the Assistant Registrar (Legal Services).
This is 71 words. It keeps the operative instructions, adds date, time, venue and contact post, and removes the ambiguous pronoun and the whom have error.
3. Explain why `with them` and `the undersigned` are problems in a public notice, and propose precise alternatives.
Read the worked answer
With them is a pronoun with no reliable antecedent. The nearest plural noun is parties, so a reader may think they must bring companions, while the office probably means documents. In a notice that can lead to adjournments, that ambiguity is costly. The precise alternative is with all relevant documents.
The undersigned is not a contact route. A notice may be photocopied, displayed without the signature block, or read by someone who was not present when it was issued. The reader then has no post, room number, telephone number or email to approach. Replace it with a designated post such as Assistant Registrar (Legal Services), and add the office address or telephone number if the notice is meant to be acted upon.
The same precision test catches the parties / applicants inconsistency. Using applicants in one sentence and parties in another may wrongly suggest that respondents need not appear. A public notice should use one term consistently and should state date, time, venue, case number and contact in that order.