The Public Notice with a Legal Trap
You are editing a 120-word public notice for a traffic diversion during a festival in Lucknow. The draft reads, in part: 'The diversion will be applicable from 6:00 PM to 11:00 PM on 12th September, 2025. All the vehicles are requested to avoid the route. The vehicles coming from Hazratganj side will be diverted towards the riverfront. No vehicle will be allowed to park on the road, else it will be towed away.' The notice will be signed by the Traffic Inspector and published in English and Hindi. A local councillor has asked that 'requested' be changed to 'directed' because people ignore requests. Your colleague says the notice is fine because 'everyone understands it'. The diversion affects two bus routes and one hospital access road. The hospital's emergency gate is on the diverted stretch, and the draft does not mention it.
1. Identify three grammar or clarity errors in the draft and correct them, explaining the effect of each correction.
Read the worked answer
'All the vehicles are requested' → 'All vehicles are requested' or better 'All vehicle users are requested'. With a plural noun used generically, the definite article is unnecessary; 'all the vehicles' suggests specific vehicles already identified.
'else it will be towed away' → 'otherwise, the vehicle will be towed'. 'Else' is not a formal sentence connector here, and 'it' could refer to the road or the vehicle.
'will be applicable from' → 'will apply from'. The longer phrase is not wrong but is wordy and less direct for a public notice.
A fourth issue is 'on 12th September, 2025' → 'on 12 September 2025' for consistency. Each change makes the notice shorter and removes a possible misreading, which matters because the notice may be challenged in a court or used to justify towing.
2. Rewrite the parking sentence so that it is unambiguous and legally defensible.
Read the worked answer
'Parking is prohibited on the diverted stretch from 6:00 PM to 11:00 PM on 12 September 2025. Any vehicle parked in violation will be towed.'
This version names the prohibited act, the place, and the time; it makes 'the vehicle' the clear object of towing; and it avoids 'else', which is not a legal connector.
I would add: 'Vehicles of emergency services and hospital patients, with valid proof, will be exempt and assisted by traffic staff.' The exemption matters because the hospital's emergency gate is on the stretch; without it, the notice could obstruct emergency care and invite a challenge. The sentence should match the Hindi version exactly in time, place and consequence.
3. Should the notice say 'requested' or 'directed'? Consider the hospital access and the councillor's demand.
Read the worked answer
Use both, but for different things. A direction is appropriate for a legal prohibition: 'All vehicles are directed not to park on the diverted stretch.' A request is appropriate for voluntary cooperation: 'Motorists are requested to use the alternate route.'
Using 'directed' for everything sounds heavy-handed and may not be enforceable if the underlying traffic notification is not cited; using 'requested' for the parking ban weakens enforcement.
The hospital access point changes the analysis: the notice should direct a general ban but provide a clearly marked exempt lane or gate pass for emergency vehicles and patients. I would not drop the exemption merely because the councillor wants a tougher tone. I would also cite the order number and date so the direction is legally grounded.