WBCHSE HS Philosophy study materials
WBCHSE HS Philosophy study resources

WBCHSE HS Philosophy study plan

WBCHSE HS Philosophy · Give each week a clear focus.

8 weeks · About 6 hours per week

Week 1

Indian Philosophy: introduction, schools and basic concepts & Indian epistemology and metaphysics (Cārvāka, Nyāya, Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Mīmāṃsā, Vedānta)

  • List the nine darśanas and classify each as āstika or nāstika, writing one sentence on why.

  • Define key terms: darśana, āstika, nāstika, pramāṇa, prameya, and saṃśaya.

  • Outline the shared structure of Indian philosophical inquiry: doubt, means of knowledge, object of knowledge, and liberation.

  • Explain the basic tenets of Cārvāka epistemology and metaphysics, including its rejection of inference and testimony.

Your checkpoint

A one-page table listing all nine schools with their āstika/nāstika status, core pramāṇas accepted, and one distinctive metaphysical claim each.

Week 2

Indian epistemology and metaphysics (Cārvāka, Nyāya, Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Mīmāṃsā, Vedānta)

  • Summarize Nyāya's four pramāṇas and give an original example of each.

  • Explain the Nyāya theory of perception (nirvikalpaka and savikalpaka) and its account of error (anyathākhyāti).

  • Describe Sāṃkhya's dualism of puruṣa and prakṛti and list the three guṇas.

  • Outline the eight limbs of Yoga and distinguish Yoga's practical orientation from Sāṃkhya's theoretical one.

Your checkpoint

A 300-word comparative note on how Nyāya and Sāṃkhya each explain the world and the self, with at least three points of contrast.

Week 3

Indian epistemology and metaphysics (Cārvāka, Nyāya, Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Mīmāṃsā, Vedānta)

  • Explain Mīmāṃsā's theory of intrinsic validity of knowledge (svataḥ prāmāṇya) and its debate with Nyāya.

  • Distinguish Advaita Vedānta's concepts of Brahman, māyā, and avidyā, and explain śruti as a pramāṇa.

  • Compare Advaita's non-dualism with Viśiṣṭādvaita's qualified non-dualism in at least two respects.

  • Identify the six pramāṇas accepted by Mīmāṃsā and give an example of each.

Your checkpoint

A 400-word essay contrasting Mīmāṃsā and Advaita Vedānta on the authority of the Vedas and the nature of liberation.

Week 4

Western epistemology (knowledge, scepticism, rationalism and empiricism) & Western metaphysics (substance, causality, mind and body, freedom)

  • Define knowledge as justified true belief and explain each condition with an original counterexample.

  • State the problem of scepticism using Descartes' method of doubt and evaluate one response to it.

  • Distinguish rationalism from empiricism by comparing Descartes and Hume on the source of ideas.

  • Explain the substance-attribute distinction and contrast rationalist and empiricist accounts of substance.

Your checkpoint

A 500-word essay that explains the JTB analysis, presents one Gettier-style counterexample, and assesses whether the counterexample refutes the analysis.

Week 5

Western metaphysics (substance, causality, mind and body, freedom) & Western philosophy: nature, scope and methods

  • Analyze the four Aristotelian causes and explain Hume's critique of necessary connection in causality.

  • Compare dualism, materialism, and one form of mind-body identity theory, stating one objection to each.

  • Explain the compatibilist and libertarian positions on free will and apply each to a concrete case.

  • Describe the nature, scope, and methods of Western philosophy, including dialectic, analysis, and phenomenology.

Your checkpoint

A 400-word position paper arguing for one view on free will, using at least two arguments and one counterargument.

Week 6

Ethics: Indian and Western moral theories

  • Outline the central claims of Indian moral theories: the role of dharma, ṛṇa, and the four puruṣārthas.

  • Explain the ethical dimensions of Yoga's yamas and niyamas with examples.

  • Compare utilitarian and Kantian ethics on the criterion of right action.

  • Apply virtue ethics to a contemporary dilemma and evaluate its strengths and weaknesses.

Your checkpoint

A 400-word comparative essay on how one Indian and one Western moral theory would resolve the same ethical dilemma.

Week 7

Logic: deductive and inductive reasoning, syllogism

  • Distinguish deductive from inductive reasoning and identify the criteria for validity and soundness.

  • Analyze categorical propositions using the square of opposition and test syllogisms with Venn diagrams.

  • Identify common formal fallacies and explain why each is invalid.

  • Evaluate the strengths and limits of inductive reasoning, including the problem of induction.

Your checkpoint

A set of ten original syllogisms: five valid and five invalid, each with a one-line explanation of its form or fallacy.

Week 8

Indian Philosophy: introduction, schools and basic concepts & Indian epistemology and metaphysics (Cārvāka, Nyāya, Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Mīmāṃsā, Vedānta) & Western philosophy: nature, scope and methods & Western epistemology (knowledge, scepticism, rationalism and empiricism) & Western metaphysics (substance, causality, mind and body, freedom) & Ethics: Indian and Western moral theories & Logic: deductive and inductive reasoning, syllogism

  • Review all seven domains using a self-made concept map linking key terms and thinkers.

  • Practice timed essay answers on two previously weak topics.

  • Complete a full-length mock exam and score it against a rubric.

  • Create a one-page cheat sheet of definitions, distinctions, and standard objections.

Your checkpoint

A scored mock exam with a written reflection identifying the three weakest areas and a plan to revisit them before the exam.

Milestones

Week 2: Can explain Nyāya's four pramāṇas and Sāṃkhya's puruṣa-prakṛti dualism from memory, with examples.

Week 4: Can write a 500-word essay on the JTB analysis and Gettier problem without notes, scoring at least 70% on a self-made rubric.

Week 6: Can compare one Indian and one Western moral theory on a single dilemma, naming at least two points of contrast.

Week 8: Completes a full mock exam under timed conditions and identifies three specific areas for final revision.