InterNACHI Well study materials
InterNACHI Well study resources

CO2, Smoke, and MERV 8 in a K-8 School

InterNACHI Well · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

CO2, Smoke, and MERV 8 in a K-8 School

A 3,500 m² K-8 school serving 420 students relies on operable windows and exhaust fans; there is no mechanical outdoor-air system. CO2 loggers in south-facing classrooms read 1,200–1,600 ppm by 10:30 a.m. Formaldehyde is 42 µg/m³, PM2.5 is 18 µg/m³ during a wildfire-smoke week, and the HVAC filters are MERV 8. Teachers report headaches and afternoon drowsiness. The district wants WELL v2 Silver with limited capital and has asked whether simply opening windows more often will solve the problem. The facilities director has proposed portable HEPA units in every classroom. The region has winter inversions and spring pollen, and the school wants to pursue Air 01 and Air 12. The team needs a defensible monitoring plan before performance verification and must avoid measures that cannot be maintained by custodial staff.

1. Evaluate whether opening windows is a reliable ventilation and filtration strategy for this school, especially during wildfire smoke and winter inversions.

Read the worked answer

Diagnosis: CO2 at 1,200–1,600 ppm indicates that outdoor-air delivery per person is inadequate. Opening windows can help on clean, mild days, but it is not a reliable year-round strategy. During wildfire smoke, winter inversions and high-pollen periods, outdoor air may be worse than indoor air or may cause other complaints. On smoke days, opening windows can raise indoor PM2.5 and undo any filtration benefit.

Ventilation: the school needs a defined minimum outdoor-air rate based on occupancy, not an ad hoc window schedule. If only exhaust fans exist, add outdoor-air louvers or fans, or a dedicated outdoor-air unit for classrooms. CO2-based demand control can trim ventilation when spaces are empty, but it should not be the only strategy because CO2 is an indicator, not a direct measure of all pollutants.

Filtration: MERV 8 is not sufficient for the Air 12 optimization and is marginal for smoke. Upgrade to MERV 13 if the fan system can handle the pressure drop; verify airflow after the change. Portable HEPA units can supplement filtration during smoke events, but they must be sized to the room volume, placed to avoid short-circuiting, and maintained. Units that bypass filter seals or run without filter replacement give false assurance.

Judgment: opening windows is a seasonal supplement, not a solution. The defensible approach combines mechanical outdoor air, higher-grade filtration, source control and continuous monitoring. The district should not claim compliance based on window-opening instructions alone, especially when the same instruction would be harmful during smoke events.

2. Recommend a prioritized package of ventilation, filtration, and source-control measures, and explain how each would be verified for Air 01 and Air 12.

Read the worked answer

Priority package:

  1. Outdoor air: establish a minimum ventilation rate for each classroom based on occupancy. Add mechanical outdoor-air supply or increase exhaust capacity where needed. Commission the system and measure airflow at each diffuser or exhaust grille.
  2. Filtration: specify MERV 13 or better where the fan system allows; confirm pressure drop and airflow after installation. For smoke events, deploy portable HEPA units sized to the room's clean-air delivery rate and document placement and maintenance.
  3. Source control: reduce formaldehyde sources such as art supplies, pressed-wood furniture and cleaning chemicals. Store chemicals in closed cabinets and use low-emission products. Address idling vehicles and outdoor intake locations.
  4. Monitoring: install calibrated CO2 and PM2.5 sensors in representative classrooms. Log data during occupied hours and during a smoke event if possible.

Verification:

  • Air 01: use accredited lab sampling for formaldehyde and other target pollutants; use calibrated real-time instruments for PM2.5 and CO2. Record method, detection limit, calibration date and occupancy conditions.
  • Air 12: verify filter specifications, installation and maintenance records. Confirm that filters are seated correctly and that the system delivers the design airflow.
  • Continuous data: compare CO2 trends before and after ventilation changes; compare indoor PM2.5 with outdoor PM2.5 during smoke events to show filtration effectiveness.

Documentation: ventilation calculations, commissioning report, filter cut sheets, portable-unit specifications, sensor calibration records and a maintenance SOP. The verification plan should show that measures work under real occupied conditions, not only on a clean-weather test day.

3. What documentation and ongoing monitoring would you require so the school can maintain performance after certification?

Read the worked answer

Documentation:

  • Ventilation design calculations and as-built airflow measurements for each classroom.
  • Filter specifications, pressure-drop calculations, installation records and replacement schedule.
  • Portable HEPA unit inventory, room placement plan, clean-air delivery rate and filter replacement log.
  • Source-control policy for art supplies, cleaning products and furniture.
  • Calibration certificates for CO2 and PM2.5 sensors, plus the data management plan.
  • Training records for custodial staff who change filters or operate windows and portable units.

Ongoing monitoring:

  • CO2: continuous logging in representative classrooms, with an action level such as 1,000 ppm as an operational indicator, recognizing sensor error.
  • PM2.5: continuous indoor and outdoor logging, with a smoke-event protocol that switches the building to closed-window, filtered mode.
  • Filters: scheduled inspections and replacement based on pressure drop or manufacturer guidance, not only on a calendar.
  • Occupant feedback: a simple complaint log reviewed monthly by the facilities lead.

Governance: name a responsible person, set review frequency and define triggers for corrective action. If CO2 exceeds the action level for several consecutive occupied days, the school should investigate airflow, occupancy and damper operation rather than simply opening windows. If PM2.5 rises during a smoke event, the protocol should confirm that windows are closed, filters are seated and portable units are running. This turns the certification package into an operating system, not a one-time submission.