Iran Loss Adjuster Exam study materials
Iran Loss Adjuster Exam study resources

Iran Loss Adjuster Exam: Iranian Insurance Law and Regulatory Framework

Iran Loss Adjuster Exam · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Iranian Insurance Law and Regulatory Framework

This domain tests your grasp of the statutory and regulatory scaffolding around a claim: which body licenses the insurer, approves wordings and tariffs, licenses the loss adjuster, and what a court will treat as mandatory rather than contractual.

The statutory layer

  • The Insurance Act 1316 (1937) is the general contract statute: formation, premium, the insured's disclosure duties, indemnity and the insurer's payment obligation. Adjustment practice is read against it.
  • Compulsory motor third-party liability is governed by its own statute (1395/2016), which fixes the categories of damage, the minimum cover limits and the role of the guarantee fund for unpaid insurer obligations. A policy term that contradicts the mandatory limits is void to that extent.

The regulator

  • The Central Insurance of Iran (CII) supervises the market under the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance: licensing insurers, brokers, agents and loss adjusters; approving policy wordings and tariffs; issuing directives and circulars.
  • The Insurance Council (Shura-ye Bimeh) acts as the higher policy-making body for market rules.
  • Adjusters practise under a CII licence and are bound by its conduct directives; an unlicensed report carries little weight.

Worked example

A motor insurer argues that its own generic policy wording caps property damage below the compulsory minimum. The claimant cites the compulsory statute. Reasoning: the statute is mandatory and the CII-approved tariff sets the floor, so the contractual cap fails to that extent and the adjuster assesses against the statutory limit, not the marketing document.

Traps that cost marks

  • Importing English or London-market assumptions into a question governed by Iranian statute.
  • Quoting a policy schedule while ignoring the CII-approved wording or tariff that overrides it.
  • Forgetting that the Farsi wording prevails and that translation shades meaning.
  • Treating CII circulars as advisory when they bind insurers.