King's Inns Entrance Examination study materials
King's Inns Entrance Examination study resources

King's Inns Entrance Examination key terms

King's Inns Entrance Examination · Get comfortable with the vocabulary.

Ratio decidendi

The legal principle or rule that a court's decision actually rests on. It is the part of a judgment that binds lower courts in later cases with materially similar facts.

Related: Obiter dictum, Stare decisis, Precedent
Obiter dictum

A remark or opinion expressed by a judge that is not necessary to the decision reached. It is persuasive only and does not bind later courts, though it may influence them.

Related: Ratio decidendi, Persuasive precedent
Stare decisis

The doctrine that courts should stand by decided matters and follow earlier rulings of superior courts. It gives certainty and consistency to the common law, subject to limited exceptions.

Related: Precedent, Ratio decidendi, Court hierarchy
Precedent

A previous judicial decision treated as an authority for deciding later cases involving similar facts or legal issues. Precedent may be binding or merely persuasive depending on the court that made it.

Related: Stare decisis, Persuasive precedent, Ratio decidendi
Persuasive precedent

A decision that a court is not obliged to follow but may consider, such as a ruling from a lower court, a foreign court, or a dissenting judgment. Its weight depends on reasoning and reputation.

Related: Precedent, Obiter dictum
Court hierarchy

The ranked structure of courts determining which decisions bind which others. A lower court must follow rulings of courts above it in the same system but not those below or beside it.

Related: Stare decisis, Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction

The legal authority of a court to hear and decide a case, or the geographical area over which that authority extends. It may also refer to a court's power over a particular subject matter.

Related: Court hierarchy, Cause of action
Cause of action

The set of facts and legal grounds that entitle a person to sue for a remedy. It defines the claim being brought and is distinct from the procedural steps used to pursue it.

Related: Jurisdiction, Plaintiff
Plaintiff

The party who initiates a civil action by bringing a claim against another person. In criminal proceedings the equivalent initiating party is usually the prosecution on behalf of the State.

Related: Defendant, Cause of action
Defendant

The party against whom a civil claim or criminal charge is brought and who must answer it. In criminal cases the defendant is the accused person responding to the prosecution.

Related: Plaintiff, Burden of proof
Burden of proof

The obligation on a party to prove the facts it asserts to the required standard. In criminal trials it generally rests on the prosecution; in civil cases it usually rests on the claimant.

Related: Standard of proof, Defendant
Standard of proof

The degree of certainty a party must reach to discharge the burden of proof. Criminal cases require proof beyond reasonable doubt; civil cases require proof on the balance of probabilities.

Related: Burden of proof, Beyond reasonable doubt
Beyond reasonable doubt

The high standard of proof the prosecution must meet in a criminal trial. It requires the fact-finder to be satisfied so that it is sure of guilt.

Related: Standard of proof, Presumption of innocence
Balance of probabilities

The civil standard of proof, requiring the fact-finder to conclude that an allegation is more likely than not to be true. It is a lower threshold than the criminal standard.

Related: Standard of proof, Burden of proof
Presumption of innocence

The principle that a person charged with a crime is treated as innocent until the prosecution proves guilt to the required standard. It underpins fair trial rights and the prosecution's burden.

Related: Beyond reasonable doubt, Burden of proof
Actus reus

The external physical element of a criminal offence, such as conduct, circumstances, or consequences. It is distinct from the mental element and both must usually be proved.

Related: Mens rea, Omission
Mens rea

The mental element of a criminal offence, such as intention, recklessness, or knowledge. The prosecution must prove it alongside the actus reus unless the offence imposes strict liability.

Related: Actus reus, Strict liability
Strict liability

Liability imposed without proof of any mental element, so that the defendant is guilty on proof of the prohibited act alone. It is common in regulatory and statutory offences.

Related: Mens rea, Actus reus
Omission

A failure to act, which generally gives rise to criminal liability only where the law imposes a duty to act. Such duties may arise from statute, contract, relationship, or assumption of responsibility.

Related: Actus reus, Causation
Causation

The link that must be shown between a defendant's conduct and the prohibited result. It usually requires both factual causation and that the conduct was a legal or operative cause.

Related: Actus reus, Omission
Consideration

Something of value given by each party to a contract in exchange for the other's promise. It is a core requirement for a binding contract in the common law tradition.

Related: Offer and acceptance, Intention to create legal relations
Offer and acceptance

The process by which a contract is formed: one party proposes terms and the other agrees to them unconditionally. A purported acceptance that changes terms is generally a counter-offer.

Related: Consideration, Intention to create legal relations
Intention to create legal relations

The requirement that the parties intend their agreement to have legal consequences. It is presumed in commercial dealings but often presumed absent in social or domestic arrangements.

Related: Offer and acceptance, Consideration
Tort

A civil wrong, independent of contract, for which the injured party may claim damages. Common examples include negligence, trespass, nuisance, and defamation.

Related: Negligence, Duty of care
Negligence

A tort requiring proof of a duty of care owed by the defendant, breach of that duty, and damage caused by the breach. The damage must also be of a kind the law recognises.

Related: Duty of care, Causation, Tort
Duty of care

A legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid causing foreseeable harm to others. Whether a duty exists is a question of law, distinct from whether it was breached.

Related: Negligence, Tort
Equity

A body of principles developed historically to temper the rigidity of the common law and provide remedies where damages were inadequate. It operates alongside, and now largely supplements, the common law.

Related: Trust, Injunction, Common law
Common law

Law developed by judges through decisions in individual cases rather than by statute. It forms a body of precedent that applies alongside legislation and equity.

Related: Equity, Precedent, Statute
Statute

A law enacted by a legislature, such as an Act of the Oireachtas, which takes precedence over inconsistent judge-made law. Courts interpret statutes and may strike down unconstitutional provisions.

Related: Common law, Statutory interpretation
Statutory interpretation

The process by which courts determine the meaning of legislation and apply it to facts. Approaches include literal, purposive, and mischief-based methods, often guided by interpretation Acts.

Related: Statute, Precedent
Trust

An equitable arrangement in which a trustee holds property for the benefit of another person. The trustee owes fiduciary duties, and beneficial ownership is separated from legal title.

Related: Equity, Fiduciary duty
Fiduciary duty

A duty of loyalty and good faith owed by a person entrusted with another's interests, requiring them to act honestly and avoid conflicts. It arises in relationships such as trustee and beneficiary.

Related: Trust, Equity
Injunction

An equitable court order requiring a party to do or refrain from doing a specified act. It is discretionary and generally available only where damages would be an inadequate remedy.

Related: Equity, Damages
Damages

A monetary sum awarded by a court to compensate a claimant for loss caused by another's wrongdoing. The aim is usually to place the claimant in the position they would have occupied.

Related: Injunction, Remedy
Remedy

The relief a court grants to a successful party, such as damages, an injunction, or specific performance. Remedies may be legal or equitable and are often discretionary.

Related: Damages, Injunction
Ultra vires

Literally 'beyond the powers'. It describes an act done without legal authority, such as a decision by a body exceeding the powers granted to it by statute or its constitution.

Related: Judicial review, Statute
Judicial review

The process by which a court examines the lawfulness of a decision by a public body. It addresses legality, procedural fairness, and rationality rather than the merits of the decision.

Related: Ultra vires, Jurisdiction
Habeas corpus

A legal remedy requiring a person detaining another to bring them before a court and justify the detention. It protects against unlawful imprisonment and is a fundamental safeguard of liberty.

Related: Judicial review, Presumption of innocence
Separation of powers

The constitutional principle dividing state authority among legislature, executive, and judiciary. Each branch has distinct functions, and courts generally do not review the merits of policy decisions.

Related: Judicial review, Rule of law
Rule of law

The principle that everyone, including the State, is subject to the law and that laws should be clear, prospective, and applied equally. It underpins constitutional government and fair administration.

Related: Separation of powers, Constitution