I85PREP
⌘ K
King's Inns Entrance Examination study materials
King's Inns Entrance Examination study resources

King's Inns Entrance Examination practice questions

One question at a time. Build your King's Inns Entrance Examination understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A client asks a barrister to accept a brief in a matter in which the barrister previously advised the opposing party in a related but non-identical dispute. Under the general approach to conflicts of interest at the Bar, the barrister should first:

  1. Accept the brief provided the earlier advice was given more than twelve months ago
  2. Decline automatically, because any prior contact with the opposing party bars the brief
  3. Assess whether confidential information from the earlier retainer could be relevant, and consider whether the client consents to the brief being accepted Correct answer.
  4. Accept the brief and rely on the cab-rank rule to override any objection

Explanation

The Bar's conflicts rules turn on whether the barrister holds confidential information from a former client that could be relevant to the new matter, and on whether informed consent can be obtained. A blanket rule against any prior contact is too wide, and the cab-rank rule does not override a genuine conflict. The correct first step is therefore a contextual assessment followed by consideration of consent.

Question 2Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the Irish legal profession, the body that regulates barristers' professional conduct and issues the Code of Conduct for the Bar is:

  1. The Honorable Society of King's Inns
  2. The Bar of Ireland (the Council of The Bar of Ireland) Correct answer.
  3. The Law Society of Ireland
  4. The Legal Services Regulatory Authority alone

Explanation

The Bar of Ireland, acting through its Council, is the professional body for barristers and promulgates the Code of Conduct governing practice at the Bar. The Law Society regulates solicitors, and King's Inns is the educational and degree-awarding institution. The Legal Services Regulatory Authority has a statutory oversight role but does not itself issue the Bar's Code of Conduct.

Question 3Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is drafting a defence in a personal injuries action and wishes to plead that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent. The most appropriate plea is that the plaintiff:

  1. Ought to have insured against the risk of injury
  2. Consented to the risk of injury by using the premises
  3. Failed to take reasonable care for their own safety, thereby contributing to the damage suffered Correct answer.
  4. Was generally careless in the conduct of their affairs

Explanation

Contributory negligence requires a failure by the plaintiff to take reasonable care for their own safety that contributes to the harm, reducing damages under the Civil Liability Act 1961. General carelessness in unrelated affairs or failure to insure is not contributory negligence. Consent to risk is the separate defence of volenti non fit injuria, which defeats the claim entirely rather than reducing damages.

Question 4Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which court is the court of final appeal in the Irish legal system, hearing appeals from the Court of Appeal and, in certain circumstances, from the High Court?

  1. The Circuit Court
  2. The High Court
  3. The Supreme Court Correct answer.
  4. The Court of Appeal

Explanation

The Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in Ireland, established under Article 34 of the Constitution. The Court of Appeal hears most appeals from the High Court but is not final. The High Court exercises original jurisdiction in serious civil matters, and the Circuit Court has limited local and limited jurisdiction.

Question 5Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is instructed in a criminal trial and discovers during the trial that a key prosecution witness may have been coached. The barrister's proper course is to:

  1. Refuse to continue acting because the case has become difficult
  2. Put the suggestion to the witness in cross-examination, subject to a proper evidential basis Correct answer.
  3. Raise the matter with the client alone and take no further step
  4. Report the matter to the judge in the absence of the jury without any evidential foundation

Explanation

A barrister may and should test the reliability of a witness through cross-examination, provided there is a proper basis for the questions. Raising an unfounded allegation to the judge without evidential foundation risks breaching duties to the court and to the witness. Withdrawal is not the appropriate response merely because the case has become difficult.

Question 6Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the law of contract, which of the following is an essential element for the formation of a binding agreement?

  1. Registration with a public authority
  2. A written document signed by both parties
  3. Consideration moving from the promisee Correct answer.
  4. A recital of the parties' intentions

Explanation

Under the common law as applied in Ireland, a binding contract generally requires offer, acceptance, consideration, and an intention to create legal relations. Consideration must move from the promisee, though it need not be adequate. Writing, recitals, and registration are requirements only in specific statutory contexts, not general essentials.

Question 7Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A solicitor instructs a barrister to draft a plenary summons and statement of claim. The barrister notices that the statement of claim omits a material fact that would support a necessary plea. The barrister should:

  1. Refuse to draft the pleading at all
  2. Draft the pleading as instructed and say nothing
  3. Advise the solicitor of the omission and seek instructions before including the plea Correct answer.
  4. Add the omitted fact without informing the solicitor

Explanation

A barrister owes duties both to the client and to the court, and pleadings must be properly particularised and supportable. The correct approach is to raise the omission with the instructing solicitor and obtain instructions before pleading it. Drafting as instructed without comment or adding facts unilaterally would both be improper.

Question 8Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following best describes the doctrine of precedent (stare decisis) as applied in the Irish courts?

  1. A decision of a superior court binds lower courts in the same hierarchy on the same point of law Correct answer.
  2. Precedents are merely persuasive and never binding
  3. Every court may disregard decisions of courts superior to it
  4. Only the Supreme Court may create binding precedent

Explanation

Under stare decisis, a court is bound by decisions of courts above it in the same hierarchy on materially similar facts and points of law, subject to distinctions and to the operation of the Constitution. Lower courts cannot simply disregard superior decisions. Precedent is binding within the hierarchy, not merely persuasive.

Question 9Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A client in a civil action wishes to appeal a decision of the District Court. To which court does an appeal from the District Court ordinarily lie?

  1. The Circuit Court Correct answer.
  2. The High Court
  3. The Court of Appeal
  4. The Supreme Court

Explanation

Appeals from the District Court in civil matters ordinarily lie to the Circuit Court, which sits as the local appellate court for that purpose. The High Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court are higher courts whose appellate jurisdiction does not normally extend to direct appeals from the District Court.

Question 10Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In a criminal trial, the prosecution bears the burden of proving the accused's guilt. The standard of proof required is:

  1. Beyond reasonable doubt Correct answer.
  2. On a preponderance of the evidence
  3. To a reasonable degree of certainty
  4. On the balance of probabilities

Explanation

In Irish criminal proceedings the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, reflecting the presumption of innocence under Article 38 of the Constitution. The balance of probabilities is the civil standard. Phrases such as 'preponderance' and 'reasonable degree of certainty' are not the recognised criminal standard.

Question 11Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is briefed in a matter and later discovers that the instructing solicitor has not paid the barrister's fees for an earlier, unrelated case. The barrister should:

  1. Refuse to communicate with the solicitor until paid
  2. Continue to act, since a dispute over fees in another matter is not a ground to abandon the client Correct answer.
  3. Seek an order striking out the client's claim
  4. Return the brief immediately without explanation

Explanation

A dispute over fees in an unrelated matter does not justify abandoning a current brief, since the client's interests and the administration of justice would be prejudiced. The barrister should continue to act and pursue the fees separately through proper channels. Returning the brief without explanation or refusing communication would be improper.

Question 12Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following is the correct description of the burden of proof in a civil action in Ireland?

  1. The plaintiff must prove the case on the balance of probabilities Correct answer.
  2. The plaintiff must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt
  3. The defendant must prove innocence
  4. The judge decides on the basis of the parties' sincerity

Explanation

In civil proceedings the party asserting a fact must prove it on the balance of probabilities, meaning it is more likely than not. There is no presumption of the defendant's 'innocence' in civil matters. The judge decides on evidence and law, not on the parties' sincerity, and the criminal standard does not apply.

Question 13Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister receives a brief in a case in which the barrister has a personal financial interest in the outcome. The proper course is to:

  1. Decline the brief because of the conflict of interest Correct answer.
  2. Accept the brief and vote on the outcome
  3. Accept the brief and disclose the interest only if asked
  4. Accept the brief but delegate all work to a colleague

Explanation

A barrister must not act where there is a personal interest that conflicts, or may be seen to conflict, with the client's interests. Such an interest undermines independence and public confidence in the administration of justice. Delegating the work to a colleague does not cure the barrister's own conflict.

Question 14Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the law of tort, the 'neighbour principle' associated with the duty of care is most closely identified with which case?

  1. Donoghue v Stevenson Correct answer.
  2. Rylands v Fletcher
  3. Hedley Byrne v Heller
  4. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co

Explanation

Donoghue v Stevenson established the neighbour principle, under which a person owes a duty of care to those whom they can reasonably foresee would be affected by their conduct. Carlill concerned offer and acceptance, Rylands concerned strict liability for escape of dangerous things, and Hedley Byrne concerned negligent misstatement.

Question 15Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is asked to draft an affidavit for a client. Which of the following is the most important requirement for the affidavit's content?

  1. It should contain argument and legal submissions
  2. It should be sworn before the opposing party's solicitor
  3. It should state facts within the deponent's own knowledge, with sources and grounds of belief identified where applicable Correct answer.
  4. It should be as long as possible to cover every eventuality

Explanation

An affidavit is a sworn statement of fact, and the deponent should confine it to matters within their own knowledge, identifying the source and grounds of any belief. Argument and legal submission belong in written submissions, not affidavits. Length is irrelevant, and an affidavit must be sworn before an authorised person independent of the opposing side.

Question 16Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following statements about the presumption of innocence in Irish criminal law is correct?

  1. It may be displaced by a garda's opinion
  2. It applies only where the accused is represented by counsel
  3. It is guaranteed by Article 38 of the Constitution and places the burden on the prosecution Correct answer.
  4. It applies only to serious offences

Explanation

The presumption of innocence is protected by Article 38.1 of the Constitution, which provides that no person shall be tried on a criminal charge save in due course of law. It applies to all criminal offences and places the burden of proof on the prosecution. It is not limited by the accused's representation or by the seriousness of the charge.

Question 17Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is instructed to appear at a bail hearing. Which of the following is the primary consideration for the court in deciding whether to grant bail?

  1. The accused's profession
  2. The number of previous convictions alone
  3. Whether the accused is likely to attend court and not commit further offences or interfere with witnesses Correct answer.
  4. The accused's ability to pay a surety

Explanation

In deciding bail, the court considers whether the accused will attend court, whether they may commit further offences, and whether they may interfere with witnesses or evidence, having regard to the nature of the offence and the accused's circumstances. Ability to pay a surety, profession, and previous convictions are relevant factors but not the primary test. The statutory framework is found in the Bail Act 1997 as amended.

Question 18Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following is the correct name for the document by which a barrister is formally instructed in a case?

  1. A plenary summons
  2. A brief Correct answer.
  3. A summons
  4. An indictment

Explanation

A barrister is formally instructed by means of a brief, which is delivered by the instructing solicitor and contains the instructions and papers in the case. An indictment is the formal criminal charge, a summons is a court document requiring attendance or commencing certain proceedings, and a plenary summons commences a civil action in the High Court.

Question 19Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is asked to advise on whether a client may rely on a statement made by an opposing party during settlement negotiations. The general rule is that such communications are:

  1. Admissible only if the opposing party agrees
  2. Inadmissible as without prejudice communications, subject to exceptions Correct answer.
  3. Always admissible
  4. Admissible only if recorded in writing

Explanation

Communications made in a genuine attempt to settle a dispute are generally protected by the without prejudice rule and are inadmissible in evidence. The protection is subject to exceptions, for example where the communications are relied on to prove a concluded compromise or where there is impropriety. The rule is not dependent on the form of the communication or on the opposing party's agreement.

Question 20Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following best states the 'cab-rank rule' as it applies to barristers in Ireland?

  1. A barrister may refuse any brief without giving a reason
  2. A barrister may accept briefs only from solicitors they know personally
  3. A barrister must accept any brief offered, regardless of conflict or competence
  4. A barrister must accept a brief in a field in which they practise, provided it is within their competence and no conflict or other good reason exists Correct answer.

Explanation

The cab-rank rule requires a barrister to accept a brief in a field in which they practise, provided it is within their competence, the fee is proper, and no conflict or other good reason exists. It does not oblige acceptance where there is a conflict, incompetence, or other proper ground for refusal. It is not limited to solicitors known personally, and a reason must generally be given for refusal.

Question 21Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is preparing written submissions for the Supreme Court. Which of the following is the most appropriate approach to citing authority?

  1. Cite only cases decided in the last five years
  2. Cite as many cases as possible to demonstrate research
  3. Cite the most authoritative and relevant authorities, accurately, and address contrary authority Correct answer.
  4. Avoid citing any case that might be unfavourable to the client

Explanation

Written submissions should cite the most relevant and authoritative cases accurately and should address contrary authority candidly. A barrister has a duty not to mislead the court and should not suppress unfavourable authority that is directly in point. Volume of citations is not a measure of quality, and there is no rule limiting citations by date.

Question 22Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the context of the Irish legal system, which of the following is the principal function of the Director of Public Prosecutions?

  1. To regulate barristers' conduct
  2. To hear criminal appeals
  3. To defend accused persons in criminal trials
  4. To prosecute criminal offences on behalf of the State and to decide whether to bring charges Correct answer.

Explanation

The Director of Public Prosecutions is responsible for prosecuting criminal offences on behalf of the State and for deciding whether to institute or continue criminal proceedings. Defence of accused persons is a matter for their own legal representatives, criminal appeals are heard by the courts, and regulation of barristers is a matter for the Bar.

Question 23Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is instructed in a case where the client insists on advancing a defence that the barrister considers to have no reasonable prospect of success. The barrister should:

  1. Decline to advance the defence and explain the reasons to the client and solicitor Correct answer.
  2. Withdraw from the case without explanation
  3. Advance the defence but disclaim responsibility in open court
  4. Advance the defence as instructed without question

Explanation

A barrister should not advance a case or defence that is bound to fail or has no reasonable prospect of success, and should explain the difficulty to the client and instructing solicitor. Advancing it without question or disclaiming responsibility in court would be improper. Withdrawal without explanation is not the appropriate first step.

Question 24Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following is the correct description of the doctrine of separation of powers as it operates in Ireland?

  1. The courts may exercise executive functions in times of emergency
  2. The Government may abolish the courts by ordinary legislation
  3. Legislative, executive, and judicial powers are distributed among the Oireachtas, the Government, and the courts, subject to the Constitution Correct answer.
  4. The Oireachtas may direct the courts how to decide individual cases

Explanation

The Constitution distributes legislative power to the Oireachtas, executive power to the Government, and judicial power to the courts, and the courts have upheld this separation. The Oireachtas may not direct the courts in individual cases, and the courts do not exercise executive functions. The Government cannot abolish the courts by ordinary legislation.

Question 25Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is asked to advise on the admissibility of a confession obtained after a lengthy period of detention without access to a solicitor. The most relevant principle is that:

  1. A confession may be excluded where it was obtained in circumstances that render it unreliable or unfair, having regard to the accused's constitutional rights Correct answer.
  2. A confession is admissible only if signed by a judge
  3. A confession is inadmissible unless made in open court
  4. All confessions are admissible regardless of how they were obtained

Explanation

Irish courts may exclude a confession where it was obtained in circumstances of basic unfairness or in breach of constitutional rights, particularly the right of access to a solicitor, or where it is unreliable. Confessions are not automatically admissible regardless of how they were obtained. There is no requirement that a confession be signed by a judge or made in open court.

Question 26Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Under the Rules of the Superior Courts, which document initiates most civil proceedings in the High Court in Ireland?

  1. Plenary summons Correct answer.
  2. Special summons
  3. Ordinary civil bill
  4. Summary summons

Explanation

A plenary summons is the standard originating document for High Court actions where the facts are likely to be disputed and oral evidence will be required. Summary summons is used where the claim is for a liquidated sum and the plaintiff intends to apply for summary judgment.

Question 27Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the Irish court system, which court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from the Circuit Court in civil matters?

  1. The District Court
  2. The Court of Appeal Correct answer.
  3. The Supreme Court
  4. The High Court

Explanation

Under the Court of Appeal Act 2014, the Court of Appeal hears appeals from the High Court and the Circuit Court in civil proceedings. The Supreme Court hears appeals from the Court of Appeal, and only in exceptional circumstances from the High Court directly.

Question 28Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In Irish constitutional law, the doctrine of the separation of powers means that:

  1. The President may veto any Bill without reference to the Oireachtas
  2. The Government may direct the courts on how to interpret statutes
  3. The Oireachtas may delegate legislative power to the Government without any limits
  4. The courts may review the constitutionality of legislation enacted by the Oireachtas Correct answer.

Explanation

The separation of powers is implicit in Articles 6, 15, 28 and 34 of the Constitution. The courts have the power to review legislation for consistency with the Constitution, as established in cases such as Buckley v Attorney General and Crotty v An Taoiseach.

Question 29Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is instructed to appear in the District Court on a charge of assault causing harm. The offence is triable summarily or on indictment. Which statement best describes the accused's entitlement regarding the mode of trial?

  1. The accused may elect to be tried by judge and jury in the Circuit Court Correct answer.
  2. The accused may demand trial by the Supreme Court
  3. The accused has no right to choose the mode of trial
  4. The accused must be tried summarily in the District Court

Explanation

For offences that are triable either way, the accused has a right to elect trial by jury in the Circuit Court under the Criminal Procedure Act 1967, as amended. The District Judge must inform the accused of this right and obtain a plea or election.

Question 30Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the law of evidence, the rule against hearsay generally provides that:

  1. All out-of-court statements are admissible if they are relevant
  2. A witness may always testify to what another person told them
  3. Hearsay evidence is admissible only in criminal cases
  4. A statement made out of court by a person not called as a witness is inadmissible to prove the truth of its contents Correct answer.

Explanation

The rule against hearsay excludes out-of-court statements tendered to prove the truth of their contents, subject to numerous exceptions. In Irish law, the rule applies in both civil and criminal proceedings, though the Criminal Justice Act 2006 introduced statutory exceptions for criminal cases.

Question 31Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A solicitor sends a brief to a barrister marked 'no fee'. What is the professional significance of this marking?

  1. The barrister must refuse the brief
  2. The barrister may charge a higher fee later
  3. The brief is invalid and the barrister cannot act
  4. The barrister is expected to act without payment in this instance Correct answer.

Explanation

A 'no fee' brief indicates that the barrister is asked to act without remuneration, often in pro bono or legal aid contexts where fees are not recoverable. The barrister may accept or decline, but acceptance implies acting without a fee for that brief.

Question 32Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is asked to advise a client on the admissibility of evidence obtained by the Gardaí during a search of the client's home. The search warrant was defective on its face. Which constitutional right is most directly engaged?

  1. The inviolability of the dwelling Correct answer.
  2. The right to a fair trial
  3. The right to freedom of expression
  4. The right to liberty

Explanation

Article 40.5 of the Constitution declares that the dwelling of every citizen is inviolable and shall not be forcibly entered save in accordance with law. A defective warrant may render the search unlawful and engage this right, potentially leading to exclusion of evidence.

Question 33Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the law of tort, which of the following is an essential element of the tort of negligence?

  1. The defendant intended to cause harm
  2. The defendant made a false statement about the plaintiff
  3. The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused damage Correct answer.
  4. The defendant interfered with the plaintiff's land

Explanation

Negligence requires proof of a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, a breach of that duty, and damage caused by the breach that is not too remote. Intention is not required; negligence concerns carelessness.

Question 34Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A client seeks advice on the limitation period for bringing a personal injury action in Ireland. Which period generally applies to actions for personal injuries?

  1. Three years
  2. One year
  3. Six years
  4. Two years Correct answer.

Explanation

Section 3 of the Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 1991 provides that a personal injury action must be brought within two years of the date on which the cause of action accrued, or the date of knowledge if later. This is shorter than the general six-year period for contract and tort claims.

Question 35Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is instructed in a case where the client insists on advancing a defence that the barrister considers to have no reasonable prospect of success. What is the barrister's proper course?

  1. Refuse to act and report the client to the Law Society
  2. Present the defence but also inform the judge that the client is lying
  3. Withdraw from the case immediately without explanation
  4. Advise the client frankly that the defence is weak, and if the client insists, present the case as instructed without misleading the court Correct answer.

Explanation

A barrister must advise the client candidly on the merits but ultimately must present the client's case as instructed, provided it is not misleading the court or an abuse of process. Withdrawal is a last resort and requires leave of the court.

Question 36Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the context of Irish company law, which of the following is a primary duty of a company director?

  1. To avoid attending board meetings
  2. To personally guarantee the company's debts
  3. To maximise profits for shareholders at all costs
  4. To act in the best interests of the company Correct answer.

Explanation

Under the Companies Act 2014, directors owe fiduciary duties to the company, including acting in good faith in the best interests of the company. This duty is owed to the company itself, not directly to shareholders or creditors (though creditors' interests may become relevant on insolvency).

Question 37Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is asked to draft an affidavit for use in interlocutory proceedings. Which of the following is the most important requirement for the affidavit?

  1. It must be drafted in the first person and contain only admissible evidence Correct answer.
  2. It must be filed within seven days of the events described
  3. It must be sworn before a person authorised to administer oaths
  4. It must be approved by the opposing party before filing

Explanation

An affidavit is a sworn statement of evidence. It must be in the first person, state the deponent's means of knowledge, and contain only evidence that would be admissible at trial, subject to the rules on hearsay in interlocutory applications. Swearing before an authorised person is also required but is a formal step; the substantive requirement is admissibility and form.

Question 38Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following best describes the rule in Rylands v Fletcher as applied in Irish tort law?

  1. A landowner is liable for trespassers injured on their property
  2. A person who brings onto land something likely to do mischief if it escapes is strictly liable for damage caused by its escape Correct answer.
  3. A person is liable for all foreseeable harm caused by their negligence
  4. A person is liable for defamatory statements published about another

Explanation

The rule in Rylands v Fletcher imposes strict liability on a landowner who accumulates on their land a dangerous substance likely to cause damage if it escapes, and damage results from an escape. It is a form of strict liability, not negligence.

Question 39Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In Irish criminal law, which of the following is the correct mental element (mens rea) for murder?

  1. Intention to cause any harm
  2. Intention to kill or cause serious injury Correct answer.
  3. Negligence as to death
  4. Recklessness as to death or serious injury

Explanation

Murder requires malice aforethought, which in Irish law means an intention to kill or an intention to cause serious injury. Recklessness is insufficient for murder, though it may support manslaughter.

Question 40Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is briefed in a matter and later discovers that the instructing solicitor has not paid the barrister's fees for a previous case. What is the barrister's professional obligation?

  1. To sue the solicitor immediately for the outstanding fees
  2. To refuse to act in the new case until the outstanding fees are paid
  3. To act in the new case, as the barrister's duty to the client and court overrides the fee dispute Correct answer.
  4. To report the solicitor to the Bar Council for misconduct

Explanation

A barrister's duty to accept briefs and act in the client's interests is paramount. A fee dispute with the instructing solicitor is a matter to be resolved separately and does not justify refusing to act in a new case, unless there are exceptional circumstances such as a conflict of interest.

Question 41Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the Irish legal system, which of the following is the principal function of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP)?

  1. To adjudicate criminal cases in the District Court
  2. To defend accused persons in criminal trials
  3. To enact criminal legislation
  4. To prosecute criminal offences on behalf of the State Correct answer.

Explanation

The Director of Public Prosecutions is responsible for prosecuting criminal offences in the name of the People, deciding whether to prosecute and conducting prosecutions in the courts. The DPP does not defend accused persons, adjudicate cases, or enact legislation.

Question 42Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following best describes the equitable remedy of specific performance?

  1. An order restraining a party from breaching a contract
  2. A court order compelling a party to perform their contractual obligations Correct answer.
  3. A declaration that a contract is void
  4. An award of monetary damages for breach of contract

Explanation

Specific performance is an equitable remedy by which the court orders a party to perform their contractual obligations, typically where damages would be inadequate, such as in contracts for the sale of land. It is discretionary.

Question 43Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is preparing written submissions for the Supreme Court. Which of the following is the most appropriate approach to citing authorities?

  1. Cite all cases mentioned in the client's instructions regardless of relevance
  2. Avoid citing any case law to save time
  3. Cite only academic articles to show depth of research
  4. Cite relevant precedent from the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, and explain their application to the facts Correct answer.

Explanation

Written submissions should cite relevant binding and persuasive authorities, particularly decisions of superior courts, and explain how they apply to the issues in the case. Academic commentary may be cited if relevant but is not a substitute for case law.

Question 44Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In the context of Irish administrative law, which of the following is a ground for judicial review of a decision by a public body?

  1. The decision was made by a civil servant
  2. The decision was made without jurisdiction or in breach of natural justice Correct answer.
  3. The decision was made in writing
  4. The decision was politically unpopular

Explanation

Judicial review lies where a public body has acted outside its jurisdiction, breached fair procedures (natural justice), or made an error of law. Political unpopularity, the status of the decision-maker, or the form of the decision are not grounds.

Question 45Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Which of the following statements about the admissibility of confession evidence in Irish criminal trials is correct?

  1. A confession may be excluded if obtained by oppression or in circumstances that render it unreliable Correct answer.
  2. A confession is always admissible regardless of how it was obtained
  3. A confession is admissible only if corroborated by independent evidence
  4. A confession is admissible only if made in the presence of a solicitor

Explanation

In Irish law, a confession is presumptively admissible, but the trial judge has discretion to exclude it if it was obtained by oppression, inducement, or in circumstances that render it unreliable. The presence of a solicitor is not a strict requirement, though it is a relevant factor.

Question 46Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

In Irish constitutional law, the doctrine of unenumerated rights holds that:

  1. Only the Oireachtas may determine the scope of constitutional rights
  2. The Constitution protects only rights expressly listed in its text
  3. Rights are created by statute alone
  4. The courts may recognise rights not expressly stated but implicit in the Constitution Correct answer.

Explanation

The doctrine of unenumerated rights, established in Ryan v Attorney General, allows the courts to recognise personal rights that are not expressly listed in the Constitution but are implicit in its text and structure, such as the right to bodily integrity and the right to privacy.

Question 47Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is briefed to appear before the Court of Appeal. Which jurisdiction does the Court of Appeal principally exercise in civil matters?

  1. It hears all criminal trials on indictment involving indictable offences
  2. It conducts the initial trial of serious civil claims exceeding a stated value
  3. It reviews only legislation referred by the President under Article 26
  4. It hears appeals from the High Court and, in certain cases, from the Circuit Court Correct answer.

Explanation

The Court of Appeal was established under the Thirty-third Amendment and hears appeals from the High Court in civil and criminal matters and from the Circuit Court in certain circumstances. It does not conduct first-instance trials of serious civil claims, which remain with the High Court. Article 26 references are decided by the Supreme Court.

Question 48Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

Under the Solicitors Acts and the legal professional privilege rules, which communication is generally protected by legal advice privilege?

  1. A statement given voluntarily to a Garda investigating an offence
  2. A confidential communication between a client and their solicitor made for the purpose of obtaining legal advice Correct answer.
  3. A note of a casual conversation between two solicitors at a social event about an unrelated client
  4. A document prepared by an accountant for a client's tax return with no legal purpose

Explanation

Legal advice privilege attaches to confidential communications between a client and legal adviser for the dominant purpose of seeking or giving legal advice. It does not extend to communications without a legal purpose, such as routine accountancy work. Voluntary statements to the Gardaí are not privileged.

Question 49Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A barrister is asked to explain the doctrine of precedent. Which statement best describes how a High Court judgment binds a later Circuit Court decision in Ireland?

  1. The Circuit Court is bound by the ratio decidendi of the High Court judgment, but not by obiter dicta Correct answer.
  2. The Circuit Court is bound only if the High Court judgment was delivered by a judge of the same circuit
  3. The Circuit Court may disregard the High Court judgment because it is a court of local and limited jurisdiction
  4. The Circuit Court is bound by every sentence in the High Court judgment, including obiter remarks

Explanation

Under stare decisis, a lower court is bound by the ratio decidendi, the legal reasoning essential to the decision, of a higher court. Obiter dicta are persuasive but not binding. The status of the court, not the identity of the judge or circuit, determines the binding effect.

Question 50Unverified - content domains not published in retrieved source

A client asks a barrister about the burden of proof in a criminal trial for theft. Which statement is correct?

  1. The accused must prove their innocence on the balance of probabilities
  2. Each side bears an equal burden, resolved by the judge if the jury is divided
  3. The prosecution must prove the elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt Correct answer.
  4. The burden shifts to the accused once the prosecution establishes the actus reus

Explanation

In Irish criminal proceedings the prosecution bears the legal burden of proving every element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. The accused generally bears only an evidential burden when raising a defence. The burden does not shift to the accused merely because the actus reus is established.