CGRC study materials
CGRC study resources

CGRC flashcards

CGRC · Build recall with a focused review session.

32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.

Three lines model
Governance structure where operational management owns and manages risk, a risk or compliance function provides oversight, and internal audit gives independent assurance to the governing body.
Policy hierarchy
Laws and regulations inform policies; policies are supported by standards, procedures, and guidelines, with lower documents providing more detailed implementation direction.
Data minimization
Privacy principle limiting collection and use of personal data to what is necessary for a specified purpose, reducing exposure and compliance burden.
Accountability in governance
Senior leaders remain answerable for security and privacy outcomes even when controls or services are delegated to vendors or other organizational units.
Inherent versus residual risk
Inherent risk exists before controls are applied; residual risk remains after controls operate and is the level compared with risk appetite.
Risk response options
Four common responses are mitigate, transfer, avoid, and accept; each requires documented rationale and an accountable risk owner.
Risk appetite versus tolerance
Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk an organization is willing to pursue; tolerance is the acceptable variation around that appetite.
POA&M
Plan of action and milestones tracks identified weaknesses, remediation tasks, resources, responsible owners, and scheduled completion dates for compliance follow-up.
Authorization boundary
The set of components, data flows, people, and services that process, store, transmit, or protect information within a system's assessed scope.
FIPS 199 high-water mark
Overall system categorization equals the highest impact value assigned to any of its confidentiality, integrity, or availability objectives.
Shared controls
Controls inherited from a common provider or environment that satisfy part of a system's requirements and must be documented with evidence of operation.
Trust boundary
A point where data or control passes between components with different security assumptions, requiring inspection and explicit risk management.
Control baseline
A predefined set of controls for a category and impact level, such as NIST low, moderate, or high, which is then tailored to the system.
Tailoring
Adjusting a control baseline by scoping, parameterizing, adding supplements, or applying compensating controls to fit mission and risk.
Overlay
A tailored set of controls and supplemental guidance applied on top of a baseline for a community, technology, or mission context.
Control inheritance
Reliance on controls implemented by a common provider or parent system, supported by evidence and documented customer responsibilities.
SSP
System security plan documents control implementation, responsible roles, inherited controls, and implementation status for the authorized system.
Security configuration baseline
Documented settings that harden a component, often derived from benchmarks or STIGs, and are verified through configuration monitoring.
Least privilege
Granting users and processes only the access needed to perform assigned tasks, reducing accidental and malicious damage potential.
Change control impact review
Before deployment, changes are assessed for security and privacy effects, control validity, and need for reassessment or reauthorization.
Examine interview test
NIST assessment methods: examine artifacts, interview personnel, and test mechanisms or activities to determine control effectiveness.
Design versus operating effectiveness
Design effectiveness asks whether a control can meet its objective; operating effectiveness asks whether it worked consistently over the review period.
Sufficient appropriate evidence
Evidence that is relevant, reliable, and adequate to support an assessment conclusion, collected within the period being evaluated.
Assessor independence
Assessors should not evaluate controls they designed or implemented, preserving objectivity and credibility of audit conclusions.
Authorization to operate
Formal decision by an authorizing official that a system may operate with acceptable residual risk and documented monitoring obligations.
Interim authorization to operate
Time-limited approval allowing operation while specified weaknesses are remediated under an approved plan with milestones.
Significant change
A change that may materially affect security or privacy posture, such as new interconnection, major code release, or changed data type, triggering reassessment.
Continuous monitoring
Ongoing awareness of control effectiveness, vulnerabilities, and threats using automated and manual data to maintain authorization decisions.
Corrective action tracking
Documenting each deficiency, root cause, remediation owner, due date, and verification evidence until risk is reduced to an acceptable level.
Compliance calendar
A schedule of recurring assessments, policy reviews, training, reporting deadlines, and third-party reviews that keeps obligations from being missed.
Evidence retention schedule
Defined periods for keeping assessment artifacts based on legal, contractual, and audit needs, with secure disposal at expiration.
Vendor attestation review
Periodic evaluation of third-party audit reports and certifications to confirm controls still meet contractual and regulatory requirements.