PPL Air Law & Operational Procedures study materials
PPL Air Law & Operational Procedures study resources

The beta-blocker and the expired Class 2

PPL Air Law & Operational Procedures · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The beta-blocker and the expired Class 2

Marta holds an EASA PPL(A) issued by the Polish authority, with a Class 2 medical certificate valid until 14 March. On 3 March her GP starts her on a low-dose beta-blocker for newly diagnosed hypertension; her blood pressure is now 128/78 and she feels completely well, with no side effects. She has booked Cessna 152 SP-KAT on 20 March for a 3.5-hour round trip from her home aerodrome to an aerodrome in a non-EASA State, carrying two friends as passengers. Her logbook shows 2.2 hours in the preceding 90 days, including three take-offs and landings on SP-KAT on 8 February, and 220 hours total time. Her English language proficiency is Level 4, valid until 2029. The aircraft is serviceable and insured for the route, and the destination State's handling requirements have been checked. A friend tells her that 'self-declaration is enough for private flying' and that she should simply go.

1. May Marta act as PIC with the two passengers on 20 March? Work through every privilege requirement rather than answering yes or no.

Read the worked answer

No. The flight cannot be made lawfully as things stand.

  1. Medical validity. Her Class 2 expires at the end of 14 March. From 15 March she holds no medical certificate, and the privileges of a PPL(A) exist only while licence, ratings and medical are all valid. Feeling well, a good blood pressure reading and a GP's reassurance do not restore the certificate.
  2. Change of medical status. Even before expiry, starting a beta-blocker is a change that must be assessed aeromedically. The pilot must not exercise privileges while taking medication that might affect fitness; the correct route is the AME, not the GP. The AME decides whether the medication is acceptable, whether a stabilisation period applies, and whether a limitation is added to the certificate.
  3. Self-declaration does not help. A pilot medical declaration is available only in certain States and only for defined light-licence privileges; it cannot keep Class 2 privileges of a PPL alive, and it does not override an expired certificate.
  4. Passenger currency is not the problem. Three take-offs and landings on the same type on 8 February satisfy the 90-day rule for 20 March. The blocker is medical, not recency.

Conclusion: cancel the booking, see an AME, and fly only once a new certificate is in her hand.

2. What must she do to make the trip legal, including the parts that are not about her medical certificate?

Read the worked answer

Aeromedical route.

  • Book an AME appointment, taking the GP's letter, the medication name, dose and start date, and a record of home blood-pressure readings.
  • If the AME is satisfied (medication accepted, condition stable, no adverse effects), the AME issues a new Class 2, possibly with a limitation such as 'valid only with medication' or a shortened validity.
  • If the AME cannot decide, the file goes to the licensing authority's medical assessor. The flight waits for that answer.

Everything else.

  • Destination State. A licence issued under Annex 1 is widely recognised, but recognition is not automatic: check the destination State's rules (validation, permission, or acceptance of the EASA licence) and its entry requirements before departure.
  • Aircraft and insurance. Confirm the policy covers the territory and the named pilot, and that the aircraft documents are valid for the whole trip.
  • Recency again. If the trip slips, remember the 90-day passenger rule runs continuously: three take-offs and landings in the same class/type must fall within the 90 days before the new date.

Note the sequencing: the medical comes first because no amount of paperwork fixes an invalid certificate.

3. She decides to fly anyway because 'nothing will happen on a short trip'. What is her real exposure?

Read the worked answer

This is not a minor administrative slip; it removes the legal basis for commanding the aircraft.

  • Licence. The flight is outside the privileges of her PPL. A ramp check, a report by the destination authority, or an insurance investigation can lead to suspension or revocation and to action by the issuing State.
  • Insurance. Insurers routinely decline claims where the flight was conducted without a valid medical. The passengers would then have no cover, and an injured passenger could pursue her personally for costs that third-party insurance exists to absorb.
  • Destination State. A foreign authority may detain the aircraft or act against the pilot; the fact that the medical was valid a week earlier is no defence.
  • Records. Her logbook would record command time she was not entitled to log, which complicates any later licence or employment application.

The judgement point: a certificate expiry date and a new prescription are the two classic triggers for 'am I still legal?' - treat both as show-stoppers until an AME says otherwise.