Jaundice at the Garde-Manger, Diarrhoea on the Pastry Section
A 90-room hotel in Colombo employs 46 kitchen staff. A commis chef returned from three weeks' leave in a district with an ongoing hepatitis A outbreak and began work on Monday. On Friday he complained of tiredness and nausea; on Saturday his urine was dark and his doctor noted jaundice. He had worked Monday to Friday at the garde-manger section, preparing cold salads, garnishes and cut fruit with bare hands. Gloves were available but the section is busy and nobody uses them. Separately, a pastry cook has had diarrhoea since Thursday, has told no one, and has been taking loperamide to get through shifts. The hotel has no written sickness-reporting policy, does not require medical clearance to return to work, and keeps no illness records. The food and beverage manager wants to 'wait and see' because a 400-cover wedding is booked for Sunday and both staff are rostered.
1. Assess the risk posed by each of the two workers and state what you would do today, before the Sunday wedding.
Read the worked answer
Commis chef (jaundice) - very high risk. Hepatitis A is spread faecally-orally and is shed in faeces from roughly two weeks before jaundice appears until about a week after. This man therefore worked his entire Monday–Friday stretch while potentially shedding virus, and he was handling cold salads, garnishes and cut fruit with bare hands - foods that receive no further heat treatment. Every portion he touched is a potential vehicle. He must be excluded from all food handling immediately and referred to his physician and the area MOH; hepatitis A is a notifiable condition and the local authority needs to know about a possible foodborne exposure.
Pastry cook (diarrhoea, self-medicating) - high risk. He is working with active diarrhoea and hiding it with loperamide, which suppresses the symptom without eliminating the pathogen; in some infections it can prolong carriage. He must also be excluded. 'He is needed' is precisely the reasoning that turns a single case into an outbreak.
Today: remove both from food work; reassign or replace them; review what the commis prepared and, where product is still on site, segregate and hold it pending MOH advice; deep clean and sanitise the garde-manger; inform the MOH and follow their direction on staff contacts and any need for immunoglobulin or vaccination advice.
2. When may each worker return to food handling, and who should make that decision? What must be documented?
Read the worked answer
Return criteria are clinical plus official, not managerial.
- Hepatitis A: usually excluded until at least 7 days after the onset of jaundice and until clinically recovered, with written clearance from the treating doctor and agreement of the area MOH. Where MOH advises further stool testing, follow that advice. The food and beverage manager cannot shorten this because of a wedding.
- Diarrhoea: kept off food work until at least 48 hours symptom-free without any anti-diarrhoeal medication, plus medical clearance if a pathogen is identified (typhoid, Shigella, Salmonella, E. coli O157 or Vibrio all require longer exclusion and MOH involvement).
Who decides: the MOH or authorised officer, informed by the clinician, sets and enforces the exclusion. The operator's role is to comply and to verify, not to negotiate.
Documentation
- An illness log: name, section, date of onset, symptoms, date reported, date excluded, date medically cleared, clearance certificate attached.
- A signed fitness-for-work declaration at the start of each shift.
- Training records showing staff know they must report illness and are not penalised for doing so.
- A named manager accountable for the log.
Without these records the hotel cannot demonstrate due diligence, and a repeat incident would be very hard to defend.
3. What system failures does this reveal, and which three controls would you put in place before Sunday's service?
Read the worked answer
Failures
- No written sickness-reporting policy and no culture of reporting - both staff made a personal judgement to keep working.
- No medical clearance requirement to return to food work.
- No records, so there is no way to know who handled what or when.
- Bare-hand contact with ready-to-eat food at the garde-manger, with gloves available but unused - availability without enforcement is not a control.
- A manager treating staffing needs as a reason to override a hygiene decision.
Three controls to have in place before the wedding
- A one-page fitness-to-work rule, briefed to all 46 staff and posted at the staff entrance: anyone with diarrhoea, vomiting, jaundice, fever, a septic skin lesion or a discharging wound must report to the named manager before starting work and will be redeployed, not disciplined.
- A documented pre-shift check for every handler on the wedding team, signed and filed, plus verification that each handler holds a current medical certificate as required by the local authority.
- Remove bare-hand contact from the cold section: tongs, spoons, disposable gloves with a change rule, and a hand-wash basin with soap, running water and single-use towels within reach of the garde-manger bench.
None of these requires capital expenditure; they require a decision by management that the rule is not negotiable.