LPSCE study plan
LPSCE · Give each week a clear focus.
8 weeks · About 6 hours per week
Lean Principles and Waste Elimination
Classify each of the eight Lean wastes (defects, overproduction, waiting, non-utilized talent, transportation, inventory, motion, extra processing) using at least two workplace or case examples per waste type
Calculate takt time, cycle time, and lead time for three worked numerical scenarios and explain how each metric drives waste-elimination priorities
Draw a current-state value stream map for a process you know well, labeling process boxes, inventory triangles, information flow, and lead-time ladder
Differentiate push versus pull scheduling and identify where a kanban or supermarket buffer would reduce overproduction in your mapped process
Explain how 5S, standard work, and poka-yoke each attack a specific waste category, citing one concrete countermeasure per tool
Your checkpoint
A one-page current-state VSM of a real or realistic process with a waste-tally table listing at least 10 identified wastes, their category, root location, and a proposed countermeasure
Six Sigma Fundamentals and DMAIC
Sequence the five DMAIC phases and state the entry and exit criteria (tollgates) that gate movement between them
Distinguish common-cause from special-cause variation and select the correct response (process change versus local action) for six given scenarios
Compute DPMO, rolled throughput yield, and sigma level from defect and opportunity data, showing the conversion steps
Compare Lean, Six Sigma, and Lean Six Sigma on problem type, typical tools, and time horizon, and justify which approach fits three described projects
Map each DMAIC phase to the primary tools used within it (charter and SIPOC in Define, MSA and capability in Measure, and so on) to build a working mental model of the roadmap
Your checkpoint
A DMAIC roadmap one-pager with phase-by-phase deliverables, tollgate questions, and a worked sigma-level calculation checked against a published sigma conversion table
Define Phase: Project Chartering and Voice of the Customer
Draft a complete project charter containing problem statement, business case, goal statement (SMART), scope with in-scope and out-of-scope boundaries, team roles, milestones, and expected financial benefit
Rewrite three vague problem statements into measurable ones that specify metric, baseline, target, and time frame without prescribing a solution
Build a SIPOC for a chosen process with at least five rows and validate that inputs and outputs are specific and measurable
Translate raw voice-of-the-customer statements into CTQ requirements and prioritize them using a Kano or CTQ tree structure
Identify stakeholders and their influence and interest, then select an appropriate engagement approach for each quadrant
Your checkpoint
A full project charter plus SIPOC and CTQ tree for one realistic improvement project, with a stakeholder map and a one-paragraph business case
Measure Phase: Data Collection, MSA, and Process Capability
Distinguish continuous from discrete data and select appropriate measurement scales and summary statistics for each
Design a data collection plan specifying operational definitions, sampling strategy, sample size rationale, and data stratification factors
Compute and interpret Gage R&R results, deciding whether a measurement system is acceptable using the 10/30 percent rule for study variation and the precision-to-tolerance ratio
Assess attribute agreement and explain why kappa matters for pass/fail inspection data
Calculate Cp, Cpk, Pp, and Ppk from given summary statistics and interpret each against specification limits, explaining what each index reveals about centering versus spread
Your checkpoint
A measurement systems analysis report containing a data collection plan, a completed Gage R&R calculation with interpretation, and a capability analysis of one process with Cp/Cpk plus a written verdict on whether the process can meet specification
Analyze Phase: Root Cause Analysis and Hypothesis Testing
Build a cause-and-effect diagram and a C&E matrix to narrow a long candidate-cause list to the few variables worth testing
Construct and interpret a multi-vari chart and stratification analysis to separate positional, cyclical, and temporal variation
Select the correct hypothesis test (one-sample t, two-sample t, paired t, one-way ANOVA, chi-square, or regression) for eight stated questions and justify each choice
Interpret p-values, confidence intervals, and statistical versus practical significance, and explain the risks of Type I and Type II error in a project context
Verify a root cause using at least two independent evidence sources before moving to solution design, and document the verification logic
Your checkpoint
A root-cause analysis package with fishbone, C&E matrix, stratification chart, and at least two hypothesis tests run on sample or simulated data, concluding with a verified root cause and its supporting evidence
Improve Phase: Solution Design, Lean Tools, and Pilot Testing
Generate and screen solution candidates using brainstorming plus impact/effort and Pugh matrix selection against defined criteria
Apply 5S, kaizen event design, standard work, and error-proofing to a specific process step and predict the resulting waste reduction
Conduct a failure mode and effects analysis with severity, occurrence, and detection ratings and prioritize actions by risk priority number
Design a pilot including success criteria, sample size, duration, control group or before-after comparison, and a decision rule for scale-up
Plan a 5S or standard-work implementation with visual controls and a documented before/after comparison method
Your checkpoint
A solution design package containing a Pugh matrix of at least three options, an FMEA with prioritized actions, and a pilot plan with measurable success criteria and a go/no-go decision rule
Control Phase: SPC, Standard Work, and Sustainment
Construct X-bar and R, individuals and moving range, p, and u control charts from given data and calculate control limits correctly
Interpret control chart patterns including points beyond limits, runs, trends, and stratification, and distinguish these from specification-limit violations
Write a response plan for out-of-control signals naming who acts, what they check, and the escalation path
Document standardized work with a control plan, reaction plan, and visual management board that sustain the gains
Design a control and monitoring plan including ownership, audit frequency, and a plan for handing the improved process to the process owner
Your checkpoint
A control plan for the improved process with at least one correctly constructed control chart, documented response rules, standardized work documentation, and a named process owner with audit cadence
Project Management, Team Leadership, and Change Management & Lean Principles and Waste Elimination & Six Sigma Fundamentals and DMAIC
Build a project plan with work breakdown structure, critical path, resource needs, and a risk register with mitigations
Explain team development stages and select leadership actions appropriate to forming, storming, norming, and performing phases
Apply a change management model to anticipate resistance, identify sponsors and resistors, and design communication and training tactics
Run a full timed practice exam under test conditions, then analyze missed questions by domain to target the weakest areas
Rehearse the project story end-to-end (charter through control) as if presenting to a sponsor, and close remaining gaps in Lean and DMAIC fundamentals
Your checkpoint
A complete project portfolio: final presentation deck covering charter, baseline data, root cause, solution, pilot results, control plan, and lessons learned, plus a scored practice exam with a written remediation list by domain
Milestones
Week 2: Without notes, list the eight wastes, the five DMAIC phases with their tollgate outputs, and correctly compute a sigma level from DPMO in under 10 minutes
Week 4: Produce a charter that passes a self-scored checklist (measurable problem and goal, clear scope, named sponsor) and correctly interpret a Gage R&R and a Cpk value on a fresh dataset
Week 5: Given eight scenario questions, choose the correct hypothesis test in at least seven, and explain p-value interpretation aloud without notes
Week 6: Complete a Pugh matrix and an FMEA that another person could execute from, with pilot success criteria that are numeric and time-bound
Week 7: Construct an X-bar and R chart with correct limits from raw data and identify all out-of-control signals in a provided pattern set
Week 8: Score at least 80 percent on a full-length timed practice exam and deliver the end-to-end project presentation in under 20 minutes