Moldova Civil Service Competition study materials
Moldova Civil Service Competition study resources

Moldova Civil Service Competition: Civil Service Legislation and Status of the Public Servant

Moldova Civil Service Competition · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Civil Service Legislation and Status of the Public Servant

What this domain tests

Law No. 158/2008 on public office and the status of the public servant: how an office is classified, how a servant is recruited, evaluated, disciplined and released, and what the statutory relationship contains.

Core rules

  • A public office is a unit of public authority exercised in the public interest; the public servant holds prerogatives of public power, so the relationship is statutory rather than an ordinary employment contract. Labour legislation applies only subsidiarily.
  • Offices are divided into leading offices (de conducere) and execution offices (de execuție); some services have special status (diplomatic, customs, penitentiary), while elected officials are not public servants.
  • Recruitment is by open competition: publication of the vacancy, screening of documents, written test and interview, scoring by a competition commission, then a probation period.
  • Career progression runs through periodic performance evaluation, class ranks, training and promotion by competition.
  • Incompatibilities and restrictions: no second remunerated activity except scientific, teaching or creative work; no entrepreneurial activity; political neutrality and no use of office for party purposes.
  • Liability is disciplinary (graduated sanctions imposed after a written inquiry and a hearing), material, contraventional or criminal; sanctions can be contested in court.

Worked example

A candidate scores highest on the written test but is rejected because the commission prefers the second candidate. Step 1: the competition is governed by announced criteria and scoring. Step 2: a rejection with no legal ground breaches the merit principle. Step 3: the candidate uses the statutory complaint route and then the administrative court; the act is annulled for failure to state reasons and for departure from the announced criteria.

Traps that cost marks

Treating appointment as a private-law hire; confusing disciplinary dismissal with release on grounds of restructuring; confusing an incompatibility (a status) with a conflict of interest (a specific decision).