MI PT Juris flashcards
MI PT Juris · Build recall with a focused review session.
33 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Long-arm statute
- Michigan statute (MCL 600.705, 600.715) authorizing jurisdiction over nonresident defendants who have minimum contacts with the state, subject to due process limits.
- Tort limitations period
- Three years from the date the claim accrues under MCL 600.5805(2); medical malpractice carries a two-year period under MCL 600.5805(8).
- Notice of intent
- In medical malpractice, a written notice served at least 182 days before filing suit that states the standard of care, breach, and factual basis for the claim.
- Duty in negligence
- A legally recognized obligation to conform to a standard of reasonable care to protect foreseeable plaintiffs from unreasonable risk of harm.
- Proximate cause
- A cause that produces the injury and is a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's breach, without an intervening superseding cause breaking the chain.
- Res ipsa loquitur
- A doctrine permitting an inference of negligence where the injury-causing instrumentality was under the defendant's exclusive control and the event ordinarily does not occur absent negligence.
- Negligence per se
- Violation of a penal safety statute establishes breach where the plaintiff is within the protected class and the harm is the type the statute was designed to prevent.
- PIP benefits
- Personal protection insurance under the no-fault act pays allowable medical expenses, wage loss, and replacement services regardless of fault, subject to statutory limits.
- Serious impairment threshold
- A no-fault tort threshold requiring an objectively manifested impairment of an important body function that affects the person's general ability to lead a normal life.
- One-year-back rule
- MCL 500.3145 limits recovery of no-fault PIP benefits to expenses incurred within one year before the filing of the claim or lawsuit.
- Mini-tort recovery
- A no-fault claim allowing recovery of up to $3,000 for vehicle damage from the at-fault driver, limited to the deductible and damage not covered by insurance.
- Open and obvious doctrine
- A premises liability rule barring recovery where a dangerous condition is apparent to a reasonable person, unless special aspects make the risk unreasonable.
- Invitee vs licensee
- An invitee enters for a purpose connected with the possessor's business and is owed a duty to warn of hidden dangers; a licensee enters for their own purpose.
- Attractive nuisance
- A doctrine imposing liability on a possessor for harm to child trespassers where the condition is likely to attract children and the risk outweighs the burden of protection.
- Design defect test
- A product is defective in design where the foreseeable risk of harm outweighed the burden of a reasonable alternative design that would have reduced the risk.
- Failure to warn
- A product defect theory imposing liability where the manufacturer failed to warn of dangers not obvious to the ordinary user, causing the plaintiff's injury.
- Implied warranty
- Under MCL 440.2314, goods must be fit for the ordinary purposes for which they are used; breach requires proof of a defect and causation.
- Affidavit of merit
- A sworn statement by a qualified expert filed with a medical malpractice complaint, stating the standard of care, breach, and causation (MCL 600.2912d).
- Informed consent
- A physician's duty to disclose material risks and alternatives that a reasonable patient would consider significant in deciding whether to undergo treatment.
- GTLA immunity
- The governmental tort liability act grants broad immunity to governmental agencies performing governmental functions, subject to enumerated statutory exceptions.
- Gross negligence
- Conduct so reckless as to demonstrate a substantial lack of concern for whether injury results; it defeats individual employee immunity under MCL 691.1407(2).
- Highway exception
- A GTLA exception allowing liability for a defective highway condition where the agency had actual or constructive notice and the defect caused the injury.
- Modified comparative fault
- Under MCL 600.2959, a plaintiff's recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault and barred entirely if the plaintiff is more than 50% at fault.
- Joint and several liability
- Abolished for most Michigan tort claims by MCL 600.2956 and 600.6304; each defendant is liable only for its proportionate share of fault.
- Noneconomic damages cap
- MCL 600.1483 limits recovery for pain and suffering and similar noneconomic damages; the cap is adjusted annually by the state treasurer.
- Collateral source rule
- Payments from sources independent of the tortfeasor are generally inadmissible at trial, but the court may reduce the verdict after judgment under MCL 600.6303.
- Contingent fee agreement
- A written, signed agreement stating the percentage and method of calculating the fee, required by MRPC 1.5(c) for contingent fee representations.
- Communication with represented party
- MRPC 4.2 prohibits a lawyer from communicating about the subject of the representation with a person known to be represented by counsel, absent consent.
- Confidentiality duty
- MRPC 1.6 bars a lawyer from revealing information relating to the representation without informed consent, except as permitted or required by the rules.
- Litigation expense advance
- MRPC 1.8(e) permits a lawyer to advance court costs and litigation expenses, with repayment contingent on the outcome of the matter.
- Wrongful death damages
- Under MCL 600.2922, recoverable damages include funeral expenses, loss of financial support, loss of society and companionship, and the decedent's pre-death pain and suffering.
- Proprietary function
- A GTLA exception imposing liability where a governmental activity is not expressly authorized by law and is conducted primarily for profit.
- Expert testimony standard
- In medical malpractice, a qualified expert must establish the standard of care and breach unless the negligence is within lay common knowledge.