Lapsed License, Incomplete CE, and a Request to Resume Practice
Dr. B’s Mississippi chiropractic license expired on June 30. She continued treating 11 patients per week through July and August and submitted insurance claims for those visits. On August 29 she filed a renewal application with 18 hours of continuing education, including 1 hour of ethics. The Board’s rule requires 24 hours per license year, including 2 hours of ethics. Dr. B explains that she was caring for her mother after surgery, relied on an old September 1 deadline posted on a third-party website, and ‘did not think a few weeks mattered.’ The Board’s staff sends a letter stating that the application will be treated as a reinstatement request, that the CE deficiency must be cured, and that the Board will investigate unlicensed practice and billing. Dr. B asks whether she can keep seeing patients while the matter is pending and whether her insurance claims can be corrected.
1. Distinguish license renewal from reinstatement and explain the consequences of practicing after expiration under the Act and Board rules.
Read the worked answer
Renewal is the routine continuation of an active license before expiration. Reinstatement is the process for restoring a license that has lapsed, and it may require additional fees, CE, explanations, or Board review. Once the June 30 expiration passed, Dr. B no longer held an active license. Practicing on an expired license is unlicensed practice; it is also a ground for discipline and can taint every encounter and claim during the gap. The Board’s decision to treat the application as a reinstatement request is consistent with the Act if the Board’s rules distinguish timely renewal from late restoration. It does not matter that Dr. B believed the deadline was September 1; reliance on a third-party website is not a defense, though it may be mitigation. The Board must still give her notice and an opportunity to be heard if it denies reinstatement or imposes discipline. The 11 patients per week are a serious aggravating fact because they show continued practice after expiration, not a one-day lapse.
2. How should the Board evaluate the CE deficiency and Dr. B’s hardship explanation? What options does it have?
Read the worked answer
The CE rule is a condition of licensure, not a suggestion. Dr. B has 18 of 24 required hours and only 1 of 2 ethics hours. The Board should first determine whether the rule allows any carryover, hardship waiver, or extension. Many boards allow a cure period or require the deficiency to be made up before reinstatement; some permit a waiver for documented illness of a family member, but the licensee must apply and provide evidence. Dr. B’s explanation-caring for her mother-may support mitigation or a short extension, but it does not automatically excuse the deficiency. The Board has discretion to: (1) deny reinstatement until all 24 hours, including ethics, are completed; (2) grant provisional reinstatement with a CE deadline; (3) impose a civil penalty or reprimand; or (4) refer the unlicensed-practice issue for a separate disciplinary proceeding. The Board should apply its written rules consistently and document why it grants or denies leniency. If it treats the late filing as a minor administrative matter but the unlicensed practice as serious, it should say so clearly to avoid an arbitrary-and-capricious challenge.
3. What should Dr. B do about the 11 patients per week and the insurance claims already submitted?
Read the worked answer
Dr. B should stop seeing patients immediately until the Board confirms her status in writing. Continuing to treat while the reinstatement is pending compounds the unlicensed-practice problem and may be treated as deliberate. She should notify her malpractice carrier, because coverage may exclude unlicensed acts. For the insurance claims, she should not simply resubmit them. She should identify every claim for services rendered after June 30, disclose the lapse to the insurers, and follow their correction and refund procedures. If any claim certified that she was licensed at the time of service, that is a potential fraud issue; she needs counsel and should consider self-reporting to the Board and carriers. She should also preserve the records and the third-party website page that misled her. With respect to the Board, she should provide a written timeline, proof of her mother’s care, and a plan to complete the missing 6 hours plus ethics. Cooperating and correcting the billing is more likely to produce a manageable sanction than waiting for the Board to discover the claims.