MS Chiropractic Jurisprudence flashcards
MS Chiropractic Jurisprudence · Build recall with a focused review session.
32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.
- Practice Act source of authority
- The Mississippi chiropractic statute authorizes the Board of Chiropractic Examiners to license, regulate, and discipline chiropractors; Board rules must stay within that statutory grant.
- Statutory definition controls scope
- A chiropractor may perform only services falling within the statutory definition of chiropractic; competence or extra training alone does not expand the lawful scope.
- Board rulemaking limits
- The Board may adopt rules necessary to enforce the Practice Act, but a rule conflicting with the statute is invalid and cannot support a disciplinary sanction.
- Board investigative powers
- The Board may investigate complaints, subpoena records and witnesses, administer oaths, and pursue formal charges through the administrative contested-case process.
- Judicial review standard
- Courts reviewing a final Board order defer to factual findings supported by substantial evidence and decide legal questions without deference to the agency.
- Licensure qualifications
- Applicants must show accredited chiropractic education, passage of required examinations, and satisfactory character and fitness before the Board issues a license.
- Application misstatement
- A material false statement or omission on a license application is an independent ground for denial or discipline, even if the applicant is otherwise qualified.
- Continuing education audit
- Licensees must document Board-approved continuing education with certificates or transcripts; the Board audits compliance and may require proof at renewal.
- Lapsed license practice
- Practicing while a license is expired, inactive, or delinquent is unlicensed practice and exposes the person to both criminal and administrative consequences.
- Reinstatement requirements
- Reinstatement of a lapsed or revoked license requires an application, fees, proof of continuing education, and Board approval, often with imposed conditions.
- Chiropractic scope core
- Lawful chiropractic care centers on detection and correction of vertebral subluxation and related neuromusculoskeletal conditions through adjustment and allied procedures.
- Prohibited medical acts
- Chiropractors may not perform surgery, prescribe legend drugs, or practice medicine, osteopathy, dentistry, podiatry, or optometry under a chiropractic license.
- Unlicensed delegation
- A chiropractor may not delegate to unlicensed staff any act constituting chiropractic practice or requiring professional judgment and licensure.
- Fee splitting prohibition
- Paying or receiving compensation for patient referrals and splitting fees with referral sources are prohibited; fees must relate to services actually rendered.
- Felony conviction ground
- Conviction of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude is a statutory ground for discipline, independent of the criminal case outcome.
- Complaint screening
- The Board screens and investigates complaints and may dismiss them, issue a citation, or authorize a formal complaint leading to a contested case.
- Hearing rights
- In a contested case the licensee receives notice of charges and may appear, be represented by counsel, present evidence, and cross-examine witnesses.
- Available sanctions
- Board sanctions include reprimand, probation with conditions, suspension, revocation, civil penalties, and assessment of investigation and hearing costs.
- Default after failure to appear
- When a licensee fails to answer or appear after proper notice, the Board may enter default and decide the case on the record available.
- Record content
- Each patient record must document history, examination findings, diagnosis, treatment plan, services rendered, and the patient's response to care.
- Informed consent elements
- Valid informed consent discloses the nature of proposed care, material risks, reasonable alternatives, and the right to decline, and the discussion is documented.
- Confidentiality exception
- Patient information may be disclosed with written authorization, for treatment coordination, or when required or permitted by law, including mandatory reporting.
- Record falsification
- Altering, backdating, or fabricating a patient record to support billing or defend a complaint is unprofessional conduct and an aggravating disciplinary factor.
- Truthful advertising
- Advertising must be truthful and not misleading; claims of guaranteed cures, superior outcomes, or unheld credentials violate professional conduct standards.
- Title use restriction
- Only licensees may use the titles chiropractor, doctor of chiropractic, or D.C.; advertising may not imply credentials or specialties the licensee lacks.
- Lay ownership restriction
- Non-licensee ownership of a chiropractic practice is restricted; a lay entity may not control professional judgment or the delivery of chiropractic care.
- Infection control policy
- The office must maintain written infection-control policies covering hand hygiene, equipment and table disinfection, and safe handling of sharps and contaminated materials.
- Reportable disease duty
- Reportable communicable diseases must be reported to the Mississippi State Department of Health within the time frames established by state law and regulation.
- Child abuse reporting
- A chiropractor who suspects child abuse or neglect must report to the Department of Child Protection Services as required by Mississippi mandatory reporting law.
- Vulnerable adult reporting
- Suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult must be reported to the designated state agency, and failure to report is a violation.
- APA rulemaking
- Under the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Act, rules require the prescribed notice-and-comment process and filing; improperly adopted rules are unenforceable.
- Contested case record
- A contested case is decided on the hearing record; issues not raised before the agency generally cannot be raised for the first time on judicial review.