MATSEC AM Arabic study materials
MATSEC AM Arabic study resources

Fourteen Hubs and an Idiom: Translating for a Municipal Newsletter

MATSEC AM Arabic · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Fourteen Hubs and an Idiom: Translating for a Municipal Newsletter

A candidate has 30 minutes to translate a 95-word English brief into MSA for a municipal newsletter, and then one Arabic idiom into English. The brief says: ‘Since 2019 the council has rolled out 14 community hubs and appointed a liaison officer to work with families.’ The glossary gives «مجلس» for council, but not ‘rolled out’, ‘hubs’ or ‘liaison officer’. The Arabic source line is: «وقد سارت الاستعدادات على قدم وساق.» The candidate must keep the register formal but readable for non-specialists, preserve the number and date, and decide whether to keep the English passive ‘was appointed’ or switch to an active Arabic verb. The marker penalises word-for-word renderings that obscure meaning, but also penalises omissions of the number 14. Her dictionary offers «أسّس» and «أطلق» for ‘rolled out’; her class has discussed «مراكز مجتمعية» and «ضابط اتصال».

1. Translate ‘rolled out 14 community hubs’ and ‘a liaison officer’ into MSA for a municipal newsletter. Choose among «أطلق», «أسّس», «مراكز مجتمعية», «ضابط اتصال», «مسؤول تواصل», and justify each choice by context and audience.

Read the worked answer

‘rolled out 14 community hubs’ → «أنشأ المجلس 14 مركزاً مجتمعياً» or «أطلق 14 مركزاً مجتمعياً».

Reasoning: ‘Roll out’ implies a phased launch of a service, but ‘hubs’ are physical centres, so «أنشأ» (established) is more precise than «أطلق» (launched). «أطلق» is acceptable if the emphasis is on the launch rather than the buildings. «مراكز مجتمعية» is the established equivalent and is transparent to a non-specialist newsletter audience. The number «14» and the date must be preserved; omitting them is a content error, not a stylistic choice.

‘liaison officer’ → «مسؤول تواصل» rather than «ضابط اتصال». «ضابط اتصال» is a calque common in security and institutional contexts and may suggest a police or military role; «مسؤول تواصل» makes the function clear to families. If the register were technical, «ضابط اتصال» would be defensible. This is a functional, not literal, choice.

2. Translate «سارت الاستعدادات على قدم وساق» into English and explain why a word-for-word rendering fails.

Read the worked answer

Translation: ‘Preparations were in full swing’ or ‘Preparations were proceeding at full speed’.

Why literal fails: The idiom’s components «قدم» (foot) and «ساق» (leg or shin) do not carry the meaning ‘rapidly and energetically’ in English. ‘On foot and leg’ is not an English idiom and would be read literally, producing a nonsensical image. The unit of meaning is the whole phrase, so the translator matches function: an adverbial of vigorous progress.

Register: ‘In full swing’ is slightly informal but common in news; ‘proceeding at full speed’ is more formal. Choose according to the newsletter’s tone. The exam rewards recognising idiom as a semantic unit, not translating each word and hoping the English reader will reconstruct the meaning.

3. The English says ‘a liaison officer was appointed’. Should the Arabic use «عُيّن مسؤول تواصل» or «عيّن المجلس مسؤول تواصل»? Decide with reference to information structure and Arabic style.

Read the worked answer

Choose active «عيّن المجلس مسؤولَ تواصل» if the council is the topic and the sentence continues to describe its actions.

Reasoning: Arabic formal prose often prefers an explicit active verb when the agent is known. The passive «عُيّن» is grammatical but leaves the agent implicit and can sound like a translated news brief. Here the council is already the subject of ‘has rolled out’, so keeping it as subject improves cohesion across the paragraph.

When the passive is better: If the officer is the topic and the council has just been mentioned, «عُيّن مسؤول تواصل» keeps focus on the new appointee. Either is acceptable if the agent is recoverable from context. The marker penalises omission of the number and date, not the passive as such; the decision should be justified by information structure, not by a blanket rule against passive voice.