«أنا والبحر»: Classifying a Poem Without a Label
A candidate is asked to comment on an eight-line poem in a 20-minute section. The poem is undated and unsigned in the exam booklet. It opens «أنا والبحرُ جارانِ، بيني وبين الموجِ حنينٌ قديم»; the lines vary from six to eleven words, there is no single rhyme across the poem, and line five alludes to Tammuz returning from the underworld. The candidate must decide whether to place it with the Mahjar romantic poets, the Dīwān school, or the free-verse/Tammuzī movement, and must support the choice with two formal features and one thematic feature. A classmate argues that any poem with «أنا» and nature is romantic, so the label does not matter. The rubric rewards precise use of evidence and penalises biography-driven guessing. The candidate has read about all three movements but remembers dates poorly.
1. Place the poem with the Mahjar romantics, the Dīwān school, or the free-verse/Tammuzī movement. Justify with two formal features and one thematic feature, and state your confidence.
Read the worked answer
Best fit: free-verse/Tammuzī movement, with romantic affinities.
Formal feature 1: Line lengths vary from six to eleven words and there is no single rhyme across eight lines. This points away from the monorhymed qaṣīda and from much Dīwān poetry, which often retains metre and rhyme even while adopting romantic themes.
Formal feature 2: The lines are short units of syntax rather than two hemistichs, suggesting the poetic line (سطر) rather than the bayt. That is a marker of free verse.
Thematic feature: The Tammuz allusion - a god returning from the underworld - is a hallmark of the Tammuzī mythic turn.
Confidence: moderate-to-high on form, moderate on school label, because free verse was also used by poets outside the Tammuzī group. The answer should say ‘best fit’, not ‘certain’.
2. A classmate says: ‘Any poem with «أنا» and nature is romantic, so the label does not matter.’ Explain why this reasoning is insufficient, using the poem’s form.
Read the worked answer
The premise is true but too broad: first-person lyric and nature imagery occur in Mahjar romanticism, in Dīwān poetry, and in free verse. What distinguishes movements is not the presence of «أنا» and «البحر» but how the poem is built.
Here the variable line lengths and absence of a unifying rhyme are formal choices that react against the romantic qaṣīda; the Tammuz allusion adds a mythic dimension associated with the free-verse generation. Calling everything ‘romantic’ would erase the very formal features the poem displays and would make the classification unfalsifiable.
A better formulation is: ‘romantic in tone, free-verse/Tammuzī in form’. The label matters because the rubric asks for evidence-based classification, and because the examiner can see whether the candidate is using form or merely recognising mood words.
3. What single piece of textual evidence would most weaken your classification? Name it and explain how you would revise your answer.
Read the worked answer
Evidence that would weaken it: a consistent monorhyme and equal line lengths, or a direct reference to emigration and the homeland that frames the poem as Mahjar.
If the lines were metrically regular and rhymed in -ī throughout, the formal argument for free verse would collapse, and the poem could be a romantically inflected qaṣīda or a Dīwān-style lyric. I would then keep the thematic reading (nature and subjectivity) but withdraw the free-verse label, and state that the Tammuz allusion alone cannot carry the classification.
Why this matters: The revision shows the examiner that the judgement is provisional and evidence-led, not a memorised label. It also avoids the trap of using biography - the poet’s date of birth or travels - when the booklet supplies no author.