Museum pricing and promotion: tourists, locals and a new exhibition
The Harbour Museum is a public cultural attraction with 61,000 visitors last year, down from 78,000 before the pandemic. Tourists make up 70% of admissions between June and October but only 15% in winter; local residents are 30% of annual visitors and mostly visit once. Admission is €10 for adults, €5 for children, and free for under-6s. The annual marketing budget is €90,000, of which 60% is spent on summer billboards. School bookings have fallen 35%. A new €250,000 interactive exhibition opens in four months and is expected to appeal to families. The government grant covers 55% of operating costs and is frozen for three years. The director wants to raise adult admission to €14 and spend the extra revenue on winter events, but the board fears losing local support and tourist competitiveness.
1. Evaluate the proposed €14 adult ticket. Use segmentation, price elasticity and revenue logic.
Read the worked answer
A flat €14 adult price treats tourists and locals as one market, but they behave differently. Tourists in the June-October peak are usually less price-sensitive and compare the museum with other attractions; locals are more price-sensitive, visit mostly once, and are important for word of mouth, school links, and political support. A flat increase therefore risks the local segment while under-pricing peak tourists.
Illustrative revenue: if there are 40,000 adult admissions at €10, revenue is €400,000. At €14 with a 10% drop to 36,000, revenue is €504,000, a gain of €104,000. At a 25% drop to 30,000, revenue is €420,000, only €20,000 more. At a 30% drop, revenue is lower. The outcome depends heavily on the actual adult mix and local elasticity.
Better architecture: peak tourist adult €14 from June to October; local adult €10 or a €30 annual pass; family ticket €30; school groups €4 per child; winter local discounts or free entry on selected days. This captures tourist willingness to pay while protecting local access and off-peak traffic. Pilot for three months, monitor admissions, local complaints, school bookings, and revenue per visitor, and keep the €14 increase only if net contribution rises after promotion costs.
2. Recommend a promotional mix for the new exhibition and school recovery with the €90,000 budget.
Read the worked answer
Reallocate from untargeted summer billboards, which currently take €54,000 and are hard to attribute. A workable split is: €25,000 targeted digital and tourism partnerships for peak visitors; €20,000 local CRM, community events, and winter programming; €20,000 school outreach including teacher previews, transport subsidies, and direct mail; €15,000 exhibition launch PR, family content, and influencer visits; €10,000 measurement, creative, and contingency.
Use different messages by segment. Tourists: short, location-based digital and accommodation or tour-operator partnerships. Locals: email and social invitations, local press, and a family open day. Schools: direct sales to teachers, curriculum-linked packs, and a simple booking process. The exhibition launch should show interactive family benefits, not just list opening times.
KPIs: tourist admissions, local repeat rate, school bookings, cost per admission, exhibition dwell time, and conversion from promotional code. Review at 90 days. If school bookings do not recover, shift budget from billboards to direct school sales; if locals do not return, test a local annual pass rather than more broad advertising.
3. How should the museum define success for the new exhibition and adjust if targets are missed?
Read the worked answer
Success should be judged on a balanced scorecard: total admissions, net revenue after exhibition costs, local share of visitors, school bookings, family tickets sold, visitor satisfaction, and repeat visits. Set targets before opening, such as 15,000 additional visits in the first six months, 30% local share, and a 20% recovery in school bookings. Because the grant is frozen, the exhibition must also show a contribution toward operating costs, not just visitor numbers.
If tourist admissions are strong but local visits are weak, the problem is likely price or relevance; respond with a local pass, community events, and partner offers rather than discounting tourists. If school bookings remain low, the issue may be transport cost or teacher awareness; fund transport and run teacher previews. If overall admissions are below target but satisfaction is high, increase frequency through events and repeat tickets rather than cutting price. Report monthly and avoid judging the exhibition only by opening-week publicity.