First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.
Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.
Question 1Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Under the Civil Code, a contract concluded by a person with limited capacity for civil conduct that is appropriate to that person's age and intelligence is:
- void from the outset
- valid without the consent of the legal representative Correct answer.
- effective only after ratification by a guardian
- voidable at the option of the legal representative
Explanation
A minor with limited capacity may independently perform juridical acts suited to their age and intelligence, and such acts take effect without guardian consent. Other acts require consent or ratification, but this category is fully valid.
Question 2Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Which period is the general limitation period for bringing a civil claim for protection of a right under the Civil Code?
- One year
- Two years
- Five years
- Three years Correct answer.
Explanation
The general limitation period is three years, running from when the right holder knew or should have known of the infringement and the obligor. Special shorter periods exist only where legislation expressly provides.
Question 3Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A property owner mortgages a building to a bank and registers the mortgage. Later the owner sells and transfers the building to a buyer without the bank's consent. What is the effect of the transfer on the registered mortgage?
- The mortgage continues to burden the building Correct answer.
- The mortgage is extinguished by the transfer
- The sale is void unless the bank consents
- The mortgage converts into an unsecured claim
Explanation
A registered mortgage follows the property, so transfer of the mortgaged property does not extinguish the security interest. The mortgagee may still enforce against the property in the hands of the transferee.
Question 4Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Which of the following is a real right (right in rem) rather than a creditor's right?
- A right to demand delivery under a sale contract
- A right to compensation for breach of contract
- A claim for repayment of a loan
- A right of pledge over a pledged watch Correct answer.
Explanation
A pledge is a statutory real right granting priority over the pledged asset against third parties. Contractual claims for payment, delivery, or damages are personal rights enforceable only against the obligor.
Question 5Civil Law and Civil Procedure
In civil procedure, which court generally has jurisdiction over a contract dispute where the defendant is a natural person?
- The court at the place where the plaintiff filed first
- The court at the plaintiff's domicile
- The court at the place where the contract was drafted
- The court at the defendant's domicile Correct answer.
Explanation
The general rule assigns jurisdiction to the court of the defendant's domicile. Contract disputes may alternatively be brought at the place of performance, but the baseline rule is the defendant's domicile.
Question 6Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A party who wishes to challenge a first-instance judgment on the ground that the court applied the wrong legal rule should ordinarily:
- file an appeal within the statutory appeal period Correct answer.
- file a new action in another court
- apply for retrial directly to the Supreme People's Court
- request the procuratorate to protest the judgment
Explanation
An appeal is the ordinary remedy for error in fact-finding or application of law in a first-instance judgment. Retrial and procuratorial protest are extraordinary remedies available only after appeal or in limited circumstances.
Question 7Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Which of the following best describes the burden of proof in civil litigation?
- Each party proves the facts on which its own claims or defenses rest Correct answer.
- The defendant must disprove every allegation of the plaintiff
- The judge investigates all facts and no party bears any burden
- The plaintiff must prove all facts, including the defendant's defenses
Explanation
The burden of proof allocates to each party the duty to establish the facts underlying its own assertions. A plaintiff proves the elements of its claim, while a defendant proves affirmative defenses.
Question 8Civil Law and Civil Procedure
An offeror states that the offer may be revoked at any time before acceptance. Before the offeree dispatches acceptance, the offeror notifies revocation. What is the effect?
- The revocation is effective and the offer lapses Correct answer.
- The revocation is ineffective because the offer was irrevocable
- The revocation is effective only if the offeree agrees
- The acceptance prevails because it was later dispatched
Explanation
An offer may generally be revoked before acceptance takes effect, and revocation becomes effective when it reaches the offeree. Because the offeree had not yet dispatched acceptance, the offer lapses.
Question 9Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A seller delivers goods that are defective in a way that renders them unfit for ordinary use, and the buyer notifies the seller promptly. Which remedy is available to the buyer under the Civil Code?
- Automatic avoidance of the contract without notice
- Only a price reduction, not rescission
- Specific performance only, regardless of the defect
- Rescission of the contract or a claim for damages Correct answer.
Explanation
A fundamental defect entitles the buyer to rescind the contract or claim damages for breach. The buyer may also demand repair, replacement, or price reduction, but rescission and damages are available where the breach is serious.
Question 10Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Which statement about agency without authority (apparent authority) is correct?
- The agent personally bears all liability in every case
- The principal is never bound by an unauthorized act
- A third party acting in good faith may rely on apparent authority to bind the principal Correct answer.
- The act is void regardless of ratification
Explanation
Where a person creates the appearance of authority, a good-faith third party may hold the principal to the act. Otherwise the unauthorized act binds only the agent unless the principal ratifies it.
Question 11Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Two parties agree that if either breaches, the breaching party pays a fixed sum. The sum greatly exceeds the foreseeable loss. What is the court's likely approach?
- Reduce the sum to a reasonable level upon request Correct answer.
- Award no remedy at all
- Enforce the full sum without adjustment
- Void the entire contract
Explanation
Liquidated damages that excessively exceed actual loss may be reduced by the court or arbitration institution on request. The clause is not void, and the underlying contract remains enforceable.
Question 12Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A lessee subleases the leased property to a third party without the lessor's consent. What is the legal position?
- The sublease automatically transfers the lease to the third party
- The lessor may rescind the lease if the sublease breaches the contract terms Correct answer.
- The sublease is void and the third party must vacate immediately
- The lessor may only claim rent from the sublessee
Explanation
Subleasing without consent may constitute a breach entitling the lessor to rescind where the contract or law so provides. The sublease itself is not automatically void as between lessee and sublessee.
Question 13Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Under the Civil Code, which of the following is required for a valid will in the form of a self-written (holographic) will?
- A seal of the testator's unit
- Registration with the notary office
- The testator's handwritten text, signature, and date Correct answer.
- Two witnesses and a notary
Explanation
A holographic will must be written, signed, and dated in the testator's own hand. Witnesses, notarization, and registration are not required for this form.
Question 14Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A and B are married without an agreement on property. A inherits a house from A's parent during the marriage. How is the house characterized?
- A's separate personal property Correct answer.
- Property held jointly by A and B's parents
- Property subject to mandatory division on demand
- Community property shared equally
Explanation
Property inherited by one spouse during marriage is generally the separate property of that spouse unless the will designates it as joint. Community property covers earnings and acquisitions during marriage, but inheritance is an exception.
Question 15Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Which of the following is a form of original acquisition of ownership?
- Inheritance under a will
- Acquisition by accession (attachment) Correct answer.
- Purchase of a house by sale
- Transfer by gift
Explanation
Original acquisition arises independently of a predecessor's right, as with accession, occupancy, or prescription. Sale, gift, and inheritance are derivative acquisitions based on a transferor's right.
Question 16Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A plaintiff sues for payment of a debt and the defendant raises a set-off defense. Which statement about the set-off is correct?
- A set-off automatically dismisses the plaintiff's claim in full
- A set-off defense may be raised in the same action and requires mutual debts Correct answer.
- A set-off may be raised only in a separate action
- A set-off defense is unavailable once the plaintiff has filed suit
Explanation
A defendant may raise set-off as a defense where the parties owe each other debts of the same kind that are due. The court then offsets the amounts rather than dismissing the claim outright.
Question 17Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Which document initiates civil proceedings and must state the claim, facts, and evidence?
- The enforcement application
- The statement of defense
- The judgment
- The complaint (statement of claim) Correct answer.
Explanation
The complaint is the pleading by which the plaintiff commences the action and must identify the parties, the claim, and the facts and reasons relied on. The defense responds to it, and judgment concludes the trial.
Question 18Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A court has issued a legally effective judgment, and the losing party discovers new evidence that was unavailable during the trial. Which procedural route is most appropriate?
- Apply for retrial on the ground of new evidence Correct answer.
- File a separate action on the same claim
- File an appeal against the effective judgment
- Request the court to reopen automatically
Explanation
Newly discovered evidence sufficient to overturn the judgment is a statutory ground for retrial of an effective judgment. An appeal is unavailable once the judgment has become legally effective.
Question 19Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Which principle governs the scope of a civil court's review in an appeal?
- The appellate court reviews the appealed judgment within the scope of the appeal request Correct answer.
- The appellate court reviews only questions of law
- The appellate court reviews only the appellant's specific factual assertions
- The appellate court retries all issues regardless of the appeal request
Explanation
Second-instance review is generally bounded by the scope of the appeal request, though the court may review legal application independently. It does not retry issues outside the appeal unless required by law.
Question 20Civil Law and Civil Procedure
An obligee assigns a monetary claim to a third party and notifies the obligor. Which statement is correct?
- The assignment takes effect against the obligor upon notice Correct answer.
- The assignment is void unless the obligor consents
- The assignment requires court approval
- The obligor may continue paying the original obligee after notice
Explanation
Assignment of a claim generally requires notice to the obligor to be effective against the obligor, but not the obligor's consent. After notice, payment to the original obligee does not discharge the debt.
Question 21Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A and B jointly injure C through a common tortious plan. How are they liable to C?
- Liability is apportioned by the court's discretion alone
- They are jointly and severally liable to C Correct answer.
- Only the party who acted last is liable
- Each is liable only for its own proportionate share
Explanation
Persons who jointly commit a tort are jointly and severally liable to the victim. The victim may claim the full amount from any one of them, and contribution among tortfeasors is settled internally.
Question 22Civil Law and Civil Procedure
An owner mortgages land to bank X, then mortgages the same land to bank Y; both mortgages are registered, X first. On enforcement, the proceeds are insufficient to satisfy both claims. How are the proceeds distributed?
- Proportionally between X and Y regardless of registration order
- Equally, because both are secured creditors
- To Y first because its loan was made later
- To X first in order of registration, then to Y from the remainder Correct answer.
Explanation
Where successive mortgages over the same property are registered, priority follows the order of registration. The first-registered mortgagee is paid first, and the later mortgagee takes from any surplus.
Question 23Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A contract contains a clause purporting to exempt one party from liability for personal injury caused by its intentional misconduct. What is the effect of the clause?
- It is void as to that liability Correct answer.
- It is fully enforceable as a matter of freedom of contract
- It limits damages to a nominal sum
- It shifts the burden to the injured party
Explanation
Exemption clauses cannot exclude liability for personal injury caused intentionally or through gross negligence. Such clauses are void to that extent, while the rest of the contract may remain effective.
Question 24Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A creditor holds a pledge over a debtor's shares but the pledge was never registered where registration is required for the pledge to be effective against third parties. What is the consequence?
- The pledge is void as between pledgor and pledgee
- The pledge is fully effective against all parties
- The pledge is ineffective against bona fide third parties Correct answer.
- The pledge automatically converts into a mortgage
Explanation
For pledges requiring registration to perfect the security interest, absence of registration means the pledge cannot be asserted against bona fide third parties. As between the parties, the contractual obligation may still subsist.
Question 25Civil Law and Civil Procedure
In a civil action, a party applies for preservation of property before filing suit. Within what period must the applicant file the action to avoid release of the preservation measure?
- Within thirty days of the ruling Correct answer.
- Within sixty days of the ruling
- Within seven days of the ruling
- There is no statutory time limit
Explanation
Where preservation is granted before the action is commenced, the applicant must sue within thirty days of the preservation ruling. Failure to do so leads to release of the measure.
Question 26Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Under the Civil Code, which of the following contracts must be in writing to be valid?
- A contract for the sale of a parcel of land Correct answer.
- A contract for the performance of a musical concert
- A contract for the lease of an apartment for two years
- A contract for the sale of a used car
Explanation
The Civil Code requires that a contract for the sale of real property be in writing; without writing, the contract is invalid. Leases, sales of movables, and service contracts may be made orally unless a specific statute provides otherwise. The writing requirement protects the certainty of real property transactions.
Question 27Civil Law and Civil Procedure
In a civil action, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant breached a contract. Which party bears the burden of proving the existence of the contract?
- The court, because it must investigate the facts ex officio
- The defendant, because the defendant denies the claim
- The plaintiff, because the plaintiff asserts the right Correct answer.
- The witness, because testimony is required to prove the contract
Explanation
The burden of proof lies with the party asserting a fact in support of its claim. The plaintiff, as the party claiming the benefit of the contract, must prove its existence. The defendant bears the burden only for facts it affirmatively asserts, such as nullity or performance.
Question 28Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A court of first instance dismisses a plaintiff's claim for failure to prove the case. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the court misapplied the burden of proof. Which standard governs the appellate court's review of this issue?
- The appellate court must remand to the first instance for a new trial.
- The appellate court may review both facts and law de novo. Correct answer.
- The appellate court may review only questions of law, not facts.
- The appellate court may review only the evidence already submitted.
Explanation
In civil appeals, the appellate court conducts a full review of both factual findings and legal conclusions, unless the law provides for limited review. It may take new evidence and substitute its judgment for that of the lower court. Remand is not automatic but occurs when necessary for a proper decision.
Question 29Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A debtor owes a creditor 10,000 yuan, due on June 1. On May 1, the creditor assigns the claim to an assignee and notifies the debtor on May 2. On May 15, the debtor pays the creditor. Which statement is correct?
- The assignment is ineffective against the debtor because the debtor did not consent.
- The debtor's payment to the creditor discharges the debt because the assignment was not registered.
- The assignee may demand payment from the debtor because the assignment was notified before payment. Correct answer.
- The debtor's payment to the creditor is effective only if the debtor had no notice of the assignment.
Explanation
An assignment of a claim becomes effective against the debtor upon notice. After notice, the debtor must pay the assignee; payment to the original creditor does not discharge the debt. Consent of the debtor is not required for the assignment.
Question 30Civil Law and Civil Procedure
A property owner mortgages land to Bank A, then mortgages the same land to Bank B; both mortgages are registered, A first. On enforcement, the proceeds are insufficient to satisfy both claims. How are the proceeds distributed?
- Bank A and Bank B share the proceeds in proportion to their claim amounts.
- Bank A is paid in full first, and Bank B receives the remainder, if any. Correct answer.
- Bank B is paid first because its mortgage was created later in time.
- The proceeds are divided equally between Bank A and Bank B regardless of registration order.
Explanation
Where multiple mortgages are registered on the same property, priority is determined by the order of registration. The first-registered mortgagee has priority and is satisfied first from the proceeds. Only after the first mortgagee is paid in full does the subsequent mortgagee receive any remaining proceeds.
Question 31Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Under the Criminal Procedure Law, which organ is responsible for approving an arrest during the investigation stage of a case involving a suspected intentional injury?
- The people's court that will try the case
- The standing committee of the local people's congress
- The people's procuratorate Correct answer.
- The public security organ at the same level
Explanation
Arrest during investigation requires approval by the people's procuratorate, which exercises legal supervision over investigative coercive measures. The public security organ may request arrest but cannot authorize it, and the trial court becomes involved only after prosecution. This separation reflects the constitutional role of the procuratorate as the legal supervision organ.
Question 32Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
A suspect is detained under criminal detention. Absent special circumstances requiring extension, within what period must the public security organ normally submit the case to the procuratorate for examination and approval of arrest?
- Within 24 hours after detention, with no extension
- Within 10 days after detention, extendable to 14 days
- Within 30 days after detention, extendable to 37 days
- Within 3 days after detention, extendable to 7 days in special circumstances Correct answer.
Explanation
The general rule is that the public security organ must request arrest approval within three days of detention, with a possible extension to seven days where special circumstances exist. The 30-day period applies only to major suspects in serious cases under the statutory exception. The 24-hour rule governs notification of family, not submission for approval.
Question 33Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which principle bars a court from convicting a defendant of a crime that was not charged by the procuratorate in the indictment?
- The principle of legality
- The principle of nemo iudex sine lege
- The principle of adjudication within the scope of the charge Correct answer.
- The principle of double jeopardy
Explanation
Chinese criminal procedure confines the court's adjudication to the facts and charge stated in the indictment; the court cannot convict of an uncharged offense without the prosecution being amended. This protects the defendant's notice and defense rights and preserves the separation between prosecution and adjudication. Legality concerns the definition of crimes, and double jeopardy concerns repeated prosecution for the same conduct.
Question 34Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
In a case where the defendant voluntarily surrenders before being discovered and truthfully confesses, how is this circumstance treated at sentencing?
- It automatically bars any custodial sentence
- It may result in a lighter or reduced punishment, and in minor cases exemption from punishment Correct answer.
- It is a discretionary mitigating circumstance only
- It has no effect unless the confession is corroborated by other evidence
Explanation
Voluntary surrender followed by truthful confession constitutes surrender (zishou) under the Criminal Law, which permits a lighter or reduced punishment and, where the crime is minor, exemption from punishment. It is a statutory rather than purely discretionary circumstance. Corroboration rules concern proof of guilt, not the availability of the sentencing benefit.
Question 35Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
A defendant is charged with theft. During trial the court finds the evidence insufficient to prove the amount exceeded the threshold for criminal liability. What is the proper disposition?
- Return of the case to the procuratorate for supplementary investigation
- Conviction with a reduced sentence
- Dismissal of the case without any verdict
- A verdict of not guilty due to insufficient evidence Correct answer.
Explanation
Where evidence is insufficient to establish the elements of the charged offense, the court must enter a verdict of not guilty on the ground of insufficient evidence. A court cannot supply the missing element by lowering the sentence, and it cannot remand for supplementary investigation after trial has begun. The verdict resolves the case and permits appeal.
Question 36Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which standard governs the approval of arrest regarding the risk that a suspect may endanger society?
- The personal opinion of the arresting officer alone
- Evidence proving beyond reasonable doubt that the suspect will reoffend
- A finding that the suspect's conduct may endanger society, assessed against statutory factors Correct answer.
- A mere suspicion that the suspect might reoffend
Explanation
Arrest requires a finding that the suspect may endanger society, assessed under statutory factors such as the nature of the crime and the suspect's history. It does not require proof beyond reasonable doubt of future reoffending, which would be impossible at the arrest stage. The assessment must be reasoned and documented, not left to an officer's unarticulated impression.
Question 37Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which of the following is a lawful ground for ordering criminal detention of a suspect?
- The suspect is a repeat offender who is preparing to commit another crime Correct answer.
- The suspect has refused to sign the interrogation record
- The suspect has retained counsel who requests release
- The suspect has requested a change of the presiding judge
Explanation
Criminal detention may be ordered where the suspect is preparing to commit a new crime or otherwise poses a statutory danger, such as being a repeat offender at risk of further offending. Exercising procedural rights like retaining counsel or challenging a judge is not a ground for detention. Refusing to sign a record does not itself authorize detention.
Question 38Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
A procuratorate decides not to prosecute a suspect because the circumstances are clearly minor and harm is not great. What type of non-prosecution decision is this?
- Statutory non-prosecution Correct answer.
- Conditional non-prosecution
- Non-prosecution for insufficient evidence
- Discretionary non-prosecution
Explanation
In the PRC framework signalled by 'procuratorate', clearly minor circumstances causing little harm fall within the exclusion from crime and support statutory non-prosecution. Discretionary non-prosecution concerns conduct that constitutes a minor crime but does not require punishment. The distinction is between conduct excluded from crime and an actual minor crime.
Question 39Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which body has authority to decide a challenge to the legality of evidence obtained during interrogation, at the trial stage?
- The people's court conducting the trial Correct answer.
- The public security organ that conducted the interrogation
- The supervisory commission
- The procuratorate that filed the indictment
Explanation
The trial court decides issues of evidence legality during proceedings, including whether to exclude evidence. The investigating organ cannot adjudicate the legality of its own conduct, and the prosecuting procuratorate's role is to present and support the evidence. The supervisory commission handles official misconduct, not trial evidence rulings.
Question 40Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Confessions obtained by torture are excluded. What is the treatment of derivative physical evidence discovered as a direct result of such a confession?
- It may be excluded where the illegal conduct was serious and the exclusion would not unduly impede the pursuit of justice Correct answer.
- It is admissible only if the defendant consents
- It is automatically excluded in all cases
- It is admissible without any further inquiry
Explanation
Derivative evidence from illegally obtained confessions is not automatically excluded; the court weighs the seriousness of the illegality against the public interest in accurate fact-finding. This reflects the fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine as applied with a balancing test. Automatic exclusion or automatic admission would both oversimplify the rule.
Question 41Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which of the following statements about the burden of proof in a criminal trial is correct?
- The court bears the burden of investigating facts beyond the indictment
- The burden shifts to the defendant once the prosecution presents prima facie evidence
- The defendant bears the burden of proving innocence
- The procuratorate bears the burden of proving the defendant's guilt Correct answer.
Explanation
In Chinese criminal procedure the public prosecution bears the burden of proving guilt, reflecting the presumption of innocence and the requirement that evidence be sufficient and credible. The defendant is not required to prove innocence, and the court's role is adjudicative rather than investigative. The burden does not shift merely because the prosecution has made out a prima facie case.
Question 42Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
A court is reviewing a death sentence. Which procedure must precede execution?
- A second trial in the same court
- Automatic review by the Supreme People's Court Correct answer.
- Review by the provincial procuratorate only
- Approval by the local public security bureau
Explanation
All death sentences must be submitted to the Supreme People's Court for review and approval before execution, a safeguard unique to the death penalty. The review is automatic and does not depend on any party's request. Procuratorial or police approval cannot substitute for Supreme People's Court review.
Question 43Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Under the Criminal Law, which of the following best describes the principle of legality (nullum crimen sine lege)?
- Administrative regulations may retroactively criminalize conduct
- Only conduct defined by law at the time it was committed may be punished as a crime Correct answer.
- Customary practice may supply the definition of a crime
- Judges may create new offenses where social harm is obvious
Explanation
The legality principle requires that a crime and its punishment be defined by law in force when the conduct occurred. It prohibits conviction by analogy, judicial creation of crimes, and retroactive criminalization. Customary practice and administrative regulations cannot substitute for statutory definition.
Question 44Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
A defendant committed a crime as a 15-year-old. Which statement about criminal responsibility is correct?
- A person aged 16 to 18 bears no responsibility for property crimes
- A person aged 14 to 16 bears responsibility only for enumerated serious crimes such as intentional homicide and robbery Correct answer.
- A person aged 14 to 16 bears full responsibility for all crimes
- No person under 18 bears criminal responsibility
Explanation
Persons aged 14 to 16 bear criminal responsibility only for enumerated serious offenses, such as intentional homicide, intentional injury causing serious injury or death, rape, robbery, and drug trafficking. Those aged 16 and above bear general responsibility, and those under 18 receive mandatory leniency. Blanket immunity or full responsibility for the 14-to-16 group misstates the statutory scheme.
Question 45Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which of the following is required for an act to constitute an attempt under the Criminal Law?
- The offender has already completed the act and caused the result
- The offender has merely formed an intention to commit a crime
- The offender voluntarily abandons the crime after preparation
- The offender has begun to carry out the crime but has not completed it due to reasons independent of the offender's will Correct answer.
Explanation
Criminal attempt requires that the offender have already begun execution of the offense and failed to complete it for reasons beyond the offender's control. Mere intention is not punishable, and completed offenses are not attempts. Voluntary abandonment after preparation is discontinuation, which carries different consequences.
Question 46Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
An offender voluntarily abandons the crime after completing preparation but before the act is carried out. What is the consequence?
- The offender may be exempted from punishment for the abandoned crime Correct answer.
- The offender is punished as for a completed crime
- The offender is subject to an administrative penalty only
- The offender is punished as for an attempt
Explanation
Where an offender voluntarily abandons the crime before completion, the law provides that no punishment shall be imposed for the discontinued offense if no harm resulted, or a reduced punishment if harm resulted. This encourages desistance and distinguishes discontinuation from attempt. Treating abandonment as completion or attempt would eliminate the incentive to stop.
Question 47Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which of the following persons may be held criminally liable as an accomplice for aiding another's crime?
- A person who later helps the offender avoid arrest without prior agreement
- A person who provides tools knowing they will be used to commit a crime Correct answer.
- A person who witnesses a crime but takes no action
- A person who is unaware of the other's criminal plan
Explanation
An aider is liable where the person knowingly provides tools, information, or other assistance that facilitates another's offense. Mere presence without a duty to act does not create accomplice liability, and lack of knowledge negates intent. Post-offense assistance may constitute harboring rather than complicity in the original crime.
Question 48Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
A public official accepts money from a contractor and, in return, awards a government contract improperly. Which crime is most directly implicated?
- Bribery Correct answer.
- Dereliction of duty
- Misappropriation of public funds
- Embezzlement
Explanation
Accepting money in exchange for exercising official power for another's benefit constitutes bribery. Embezzlement and misappropriation concern unlawful taking of public property for personal use, not trading influence for payment. Dereliction of duty concerns failure to perform duties and does not capture the quid pro quo.
Question 49Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
A person who steals a wallet and, when chased, uses force to resist capture. How is the conduct characterized?
- Intentional injury only
- Robbery Correct answer.
- Extortion
- Theft only
Explanation
Where an offender uses force on the spot to resist capture after committing theft, the conduct is converted to robbery under the Criminal Law. The force must be used at the scene for the purpose of retaining the property or evading arrest. Theft alone and intentional injury alone do not capture the combined statutory conversion.
Question 50Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure
Which of the following is an element of self-defense as a justification under the Criminal Law?
- The defense must be directed against an ongoing unlawful infringement Correct answer.
- The defense must cause greater harm than the threatened harm
- The defender must have acted after the danger had ended
- The defender must first retreat if retreat is possible
Explanation
Self-defense requires an ongoing unlawful infringement and defensive action taken to stop it, with the defense directed against the infringer. Defense after the danger has ended is not justified, and there is no general duty to retreat. Excessive force may reduce liability but does not negate the basic elements.