PKMC Module IV study materials
PKMC Module IV study resources

PKMC Module IV flashcards

PKMC Module IV · Build recall with a focused review session.

32 cards. Read the term and the definition here. The deck at the top of this page is optional.

Tacit knowledge
Knowledge held in personal experience, intuition, and skill that is difficult to articulate or codify. It transfers best through observation, mentoring, and joint work rather than documents.
Explicit knowledge
Knowledge that has been codified into documents, procedures, models, or databases so it can be stored, searched, and transferred independently of the person who created it.
DIKW hierarchy
A model ordering data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. Each level adds context and interpretation, with wisdom representing judgment about when and how to apply knowledge.
Knowledge life cycle
The sequence of creating, validating, codifying, storing, sharing, applying, and retiring knowledge. Value is realized only when knowledge is actually applied.
Structured interview
An elicitation method using a fixed set of predetermined questions asked consistently across interviewees. It supports comparison and coverage but limits exploration of unexpected topics.
Delphi technique
An anonymous, multi-round expert elicitation using controlled feedback between rounds to converge opinion. It reduces dominance and groupthink but requires several cycles and time.
Nominal group technique
A structured group method: silent individual idea generation, round-robin recording of ideas, then ranked voting. It reduces groupthink compared with open discussion.
Observation (job shadowing)
Watching people perform work to capture tacit know-how they cannot easily describe. It reveals workarounds and implicit rules but is time-consuming and can alter behavior.
After-action review
A structured debrief immediately after an event asking what was supposed to happen, what happened, why the difference, and what to improve. It captures knowledge while memory is fresh.
Focus group
A facilitated discussion with roughly six to ten participants that surfaces shared and conflicting views. Individual interviews are preferable when hierarchy would suppress candor.
Affinity diagramming
A technique for clustering large numbers of generated ideas or knowledge items into related groups, revealing themes and structure before prioritization or documentation.
Metadata for knowledge assets
Descriptive attributes attached to an asset, minimally title, owner, creation date, version, source project, sensitivity classification, and review or expiry date, enabling retrieval and control.
Taxonomy versus folksonomy
A taxonomy is a controlled hierarchical classification; a folksonomy is user-generated tagging. Combining both balances consistency with the findability of emerging terms.
Retrieval precision
The proportion of returned search results that are relevant, calculated as relevant items returned divided by total items returned. It falls as repositories grow without curation.
Retrieval recall
The proportion of all relevant items that a search actually returns, calculated as relevant items returned divided by all relevant items in the repository.
Single source of truth
A principle that each knowledge asset has exactly one authoritative location. Other appearances are links or references, preventing conflicting duplicate versions.
Information architecture layers
The four layers enabling retrieval: repository for storage, taxonomy and metadata for organization, search and navigation for retrieval, and permissions for access control.
Least privilege access
An access control principle granting users only the knowledge and systems permissions needed for their role. Classification and need-to-know determine what can be stored, viewed, or exported.
SECI model
A knowledge conversion model: socialization (tacit to tacit), externalization (tacit to explicit), combination (explicit to explicit), and internalization (explicit to tacit).
Communities of practice
Voluntary cross-project groups bound by shared interest in a domain. They differ from formal project teams and temporary task forces and are suited to ongoing peer knowledge exchange.
Absorptive capacity
The receiver's ability to recognize and internalize new knowledge, dependent on prior related knowledge and available time. Sending a document does not guarantee transfer.
Knowledge broker
A person who spans organizational or technical boundaries and translates knowledge between groups, reducing transfer loss where disciplines, vocabularies, or cultures differ.
Media richness fit
Matching communication channel to knowledge complexity: rich media such as face-to-face suit ambiguous knowledge, while lean media such as documents suit simple codified knowledge.
Push versus pull transfer
Push mechanisms broadcast knowledge to recipients through reports and portals; pull mechanisms let users seek it through search and expert access. Effective programs combine both.
Reuse applicability assessment
Evaluating whether a prior lesson or asset fits a new context by comparing scale, sector, technology, and constraints. Low similarity raises adaptation cost and failure risk.
Actionable lesson format
A lesson written as a trigger condition plus recommended action rather than narrative history, making it directly reusable by future project teams facing the same situation.
Decision log
A record of key decisions with rationale, alternatives considered, date, and decision maker. It preserves reasoning so later teams can reuse the thinking, not only the outcome.
Reuse rate metric
A measure of how often existing knowledge assets are applied in delivery, such as templates used or prior lessons referenced in plans, indicating knowledge application effectiveness.
Lessons-learned register fields
Standard fields including identifier, date, phase, category, description, root cause, impact, recommendation, owner, status, and reuse reference, enabling traceability and application.
Five Whys
A root-cause technique that repeatedly asks why a problem occurred, typically about five times, to move from symptom to underlying cause before recording a lesson.
Retention schedule
A policy specifying how long each record class is kept, the legal or regulatory hold that applies, the storage format, and the authorized destruction date.
Post-implementation review
A review comparing actual outcomes against the business case and baseline after delivery, feeding benefits realization and improving future estimates and lessons.